The pH-and the temperature dependence of the rate constant for electron transfer from tyrosine to ruthenium in Ru(II)(bpy) 2 (4-Me-4′CONH-L-tyrosine etyl ester-2,2′-bpy) 2PF 6 was investigated using flash photolysis. At a pH below the tyrosine pK a ≈ 10 the rate constant increased monotonically with pH. This increase was consistent with a concerted electron transfer/deprotonation mechanism. Also indicative of a concerted reaction was the unusually high reorganization energy, 2 eV, extracted from temperature-dependent measurements. Deprotonation of the tyrosine group, at pH > pK a , resulted in a 100-fold increase in rate constant due to a decreased reorganization energy, λ ) 0.9 eV. Also, the rate constant became independent of pH. In Mn-depleted photosystem II a similar pH dependence has been found for electron transfer from tyrosine Z (Tyr Z ) to the oxidized primary donor P680 + . On the basis of the kinetic similarities we propose that the mechanisms in the two systems are the same, that is, the electron transfer occurs as a concerted protoncoupled electron-transfer reaction, and at pH < 7 the Tyr Z proton is released directly to the bulk water.

Photoinhibition ofphotosynthesis was studied in isolated photosystem II membranes by using chlorophyll fluorescence and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy combined with protein analysis. Under anaerobic conditions four sequentially intermediate steps in the photoinhibitory process were identified and characterized. These intermediates show high dark chlorophyll fluorescence (Fo) with typical decay kinetics (fast, semistable, stable, and nondecaying). The fast-decaying state has no bound Q. but possesses a single reduced QA species with a 30-s decay half-time in the dark (QB, second quinone acceptor; QA, first quinone acceptor). In the semistable state, Q-is stabilized for 2-3 min most likely by protonation, and gives rise to the Q-Fe2' EPR signal in the dark. In the stable state, QA has become double reduced and is stabilized for 0.5-2 hr by protonation and a protein conformational change. The final, nondecaying state is likely to represent centers where QA H2 has left its binding site. The first three photoinhibitory states are reversible in the dark through reestablishment of QA to QB electron transfer. Significantiy, illumination at 4 K of anaerobically photoinhibited centers trapped in all but the fast state gives rise to a spinpolarized triplet EPR signal from chlorophyll Pawl (primary electron donor). When oxygen is introduced during anaerobic illumination, the light-inducible chlorophyll triplet is lost concomitant with induction of D1 protein degradation. The results are integrated into a model for the photoinhibitory process involving initial loss of bound QuB followed by stable reduction and subsequent loss of QA facilitating chlorophyll P6w, triplet formation. This in turn mediates lght-induced formation of highly reactive and damaging singlet oxygen.Oxidative damage to proteins is a normal consequence of a variety ofbiochemical reactions (1). The repair often requires degradation and resynthesis of the damaged proteins. Such protein turnover is known to occur for one protein in plant chloroplasts under conditions of high light stress (2-4). This protein, designated D1, is one of the reaction center subunits of photosystem II (PSII) that catalyzes the important watersplitting reaction (4). The turnover of the D1 protein is an event subsequent to the photoinactivation of PSII electron transport that occurs at high light intensities. There is at present no consensus with respect to the molecular mechanism behind these photoinactivation and protein-damaging events in plants normally referred to as photoinhibition.The first inactivation of PSII electron transport has been proposed to be targeted to the primary (QA) (4,5) or the secondary (QB) quinone acceptor (2,3,6) or the primary charge separation (7). The photoinactivation is thought to result in damage to the D1 protein, which thereby becomes triggered for degradation. This damage has been suggested to include formation of toxic oxygen species (8, 9). Under certain conditions, D1 protein degradation may be triggered by lo...

Photosynthesis is performed by a multitude of organisms, but in nearly all cases, it is variations on a common theme: absorption of light followed by energy transfer to a reaction center where charge separation takes place. This initial form of chemical energy is stabilized by the biosynthesis of carbohydrates. To produce these energy-rich products, a substrate is needed that feeds in reductive equivalents. When photosynthetic microorganisms learned to use water as a substrate some 2 billion years ago, a fundamental barrier against unlimited use of solar energy was overcome. The possibility of solar energy use has inspired researchers to construct artificial photosynthetic systems that show analogy to parts of the intricate molecular machinery of photosynthesis. Recent years have seen a reorientation of efforts toward creating integrated light-to-fuel systems that can use solar energy for direct synthesis of energy-rich compounds, so-called solar fuels. Sustainable production of solar fuels is a long awaited development that promises extensive solar energy use combined with long-term storage. The stoichiometry of water splitting into molecular oxygen, protons, and electrons is deceptively simple; achieving it by chemical catalysis has proven remarkably difficult. The reaction center Photosystem II couples light-induced charge separation to an efficient molecular water-splitting catalyst, a Mn(4)Ca complex, and is thus an important template for biomimetic chemistry. In our aims to design biomimetic manganese complexes for light-driven water oxidation, we link photosensitizers and charge-separation motifs to potential catalysts in supramolecular assemblies. In photosynthesis, production of carbohydrates demands the delivery of multiple reducing equivalents to CO(2). In contrast, the two-electron reduction of protons to molecular hydrogen is much less demanding. Virtually all microorganisms have enzymes called hydrogenases that convert protons to hydrogen, many of them with good catalytic efficiency. The catalytic sites of hydrogenases are now the center of attention of biomimetic efforts, providing prospects for catalytic hydrogen production with inexpensive metals. Thus, we might complete the water-to-fuel conversion: light + 2H(2)O --> 2H(2) + O(2). This reaction formula is to some extent already elegantly fulfilled by cyanobacteria and green algae, water-splitting photosynthetic microorganisms that under certain conditions also can produce hydrogen. An alternative route to hydrogen from solar energy is therefore to engineer these organisms to produce hydrogen more efficiently. This Account describes our original approach to combine research in these two fields: mimicking structural and functional principles of both Photosystem II and hydrogenases by synthetic chemistry and engineering cyanobacteria to become better hydrogen producers and ultimately developing new routes toward synthetic biology.

Solar energy conversion in photovoltaics or photocatalysis involves light harvesting, or sensitization, of a semiconductor or catalyst as a first step. Rare elements are frequently used for this purpose, but they are obviously not ideal for large-scale implementation. Great efforts have been made to replace the widely used ruthenium with more abundant analogues like iron, but without much success due to the very short-lived excited states of the resulting iron complexes. Here, we describe the development of an iron-nitrogen-heterocyclic-carbene sensitizer with an excited-state lifetime that is nearly a thousand-fold longer than that of traditional iron polypyridyl complexes. By the use of electron paramagnetic resonance, transient absorption spectroscopy, transient terahertz spectroscopy and quantum chemical calculations, we show that the iron complex generates photoelectrons in the conduction band of titanium dioxide with a quantum yield of 92% from the (3)MLCT (metal-to-ligand charge transfer) state. These results open up possibilities to develop solar energy-converting materials based on abundant elements.

The effect of protonation events on the charge equilibrium between tyrosine-D and the water-oxidizing complex in photosystem II has been studied by time-resolved measurements of the EPR signal IIslow at room temperature. The flash-induced oxidation of YD by the water-oxidizing complex in the S2 state is a monophasic process above pH 6.5 and biphasic at lower pHs, showing a slow and a fast phase. The half-time of the slow phase increases from about 1 s at pH 8.0 to about 20 s at pH 5.0, whereas the half-time of the fast phase is pH independent (0.4-1 s). The dark reduction of YD+ was followed by measuring the decay of signal IIslow at room temperature. YD+ decays in a biphasic way on the tens of minutes to hours time scale. The minutes phase is due to the electron transfer to YD+ from the S0 state of the water-oxidizing complex. The half-time of this process increases from about 5 min at pH 8.0 to 40 min at pH 4.5. The hours phase of YD+ has a constant half-time of about 500 min between pH 4.7 and 7.2, which abruptly decreases above pH 7.2 and below pH 4.7. This phase reflects the reduction of YD+ either from the medium or by an unidentified redox component of PSII in those centers that are in the S1 state. The titration curve of the half-times for the oxidation of YD reveals a proton binding with a pK around 7.3-7.5 that retards the electron transfer from YD to the water-oxidizing complex. We propose that this monoprotic event reflects the protonation of an amino acid residue, probably histidine-190 on the D2 protein, to which YD is hydrogen bonded. The titration curves for the oxidation of YD and for the reduction of YD+ show a second proton binding with pK approximately 5.8-6.0 that accelerates the electron transfer from YD to the water-oxidizing complex and retards the process in the opposite direction. This protonation most probably affects the water-oxidizing complex. From the measured kinetic parameters, the lowest limits for the equilibrium constants between the S0YD+ and the S1YD as well as between the S1YD+ and S2YD states were estimated to be 5 and 750-1000, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The coupling of electron and proton transfer is an important controlling factor in radical proteins, such as photosystem II, ribinucleotide reductase, cytochrome oxidases, and DNA photolyase. This was investigated in model complexes in which a tyrosine or tryptophan residue was oxidized by a laser-flash generated trisbipyridine-Ru(III) moiety in an intramolecular, proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reaction. The PCET was found to proceed in a competition between a stepwise reaction, in which electron transfer is followed by deprotonation of the amino acid radical (ETPT), and a concerted reaction, in which both the electron and proton are transferred in a single reaction step (CEP). Moreover, we found that we could analyze the kinetic data for PCET by Marcus' theory for electron transfer. By altering the solution pH, the strength of the Ru(III) oxidant, or the identity of the amino acid, we could induce a switch between the two mechanisms and obtain quantitative data for the parameters that control which one will dominate. The characteristic pH-dependence of the CEP rate (M. Sjodin et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3932) reflects the pH-dependence of the driving force caused by proton release to the bulk. For the pH-independent ETPT on the other hand, the driving force of the rate-determining ET step is pH-independent and smaller. On the other hand, temperature-dependent data showed that the reorganization energy was higher for CEP, while the pre-exponential factors showed no significant difference between the mechanisms. Thus, the opposing effect of the differences in driving force and reorganization energy determines which of the mechanisms will dominate. Our results show that a concerted mechanism is in general quite likely and provides a low-barrier reaction pathway for weakly exoergonic reactions. In addition, the kinetic isotope effect was much higher for CEP (kH/kD > 10) than for ETPT (kH/kD = 2), consistent with significant changes along the proton reaction coordinate in the rate-determining step of CEP.

For a detailed understanding of the function of photosystem II (PSII), a molecular structure is needed. The crystal structure has not yet been determined, but the PSII reaction center proteins D1 and D2 show homology with the L and M subunits of the photosynthetic reaction center from purple bacteria. We have modeled important parts of the D1 and D2 proteins on the basis of the crystallographic structure of the reaction center from Rhodopseudomonas viridis. The model contains the central core of the PSII reaction center, including the protein regions for the transmembrane helices B, C, D, and E and loops B-C and C-D connecting the helices. In the model, four chlorophylls, two pheophytins, and the nonheme Fe2+ ion are included. We have applied techniques from computational chemistry that incorporate statistical data on side-chain rotameric states from known protein structure and that describe interactions within the model using an empirical potential energy function. The conformation of chlorophyll pigments in the model was optimized by using exciton interaction calculations in combination with potential energy calculations to find a solution that agrees with experimentally determined exciton interaction energies. The model is analyzed and compared with experimental results for the regions of P680, the redox active pheophytin, the acceptor side Fe2+, and the tyrosyl radicals TyrD and TyrZ. P680 is proposed to be a weakly coupled chlorophyll a pair which makes three hydrogen bonds with residues on the D1 and D2 proteins. In the model the redox-active pheophytin is hydrogen bonded to D1-Glu130 and possibly also to D1-Tyr126 and D1-Tyr147. TyrD is hydrogen bonded to D2-His190 and also interacts with D2-Gln165. TyrZ is bound in a hydrophilic environment which is partially constituted by D1-Gln165, D1-Asp170, D1-Glu189, and D1-His190. These polar residues are most likely involved in proton transfer from oxidized TyrZ or in metal binding.

No abstract