-The impact of Elodea canadensis on aquatic macrophyte biodiversity in (Lake) Steinsfjord has been studied through extensive lake-wide surveys and photographic sampling. E. canadensis greatly expanded in Steinsfjord since its appearance in 1978 and still dominated the macrophyte community in 2004. The areal distribution of E. canadensis peaked within 6 years from invasion and has remained relatively stable since; however, stands no longer reach the water surface. E. canadensis significantly increased its depth range, but the cover-weighted mean depth remained unchanged, suggesting that 3-4 m is its optimal depth in Steinsfjord. Species richness has not changed significantly since the earliest survey in 1936-38. However, species composition has changed remarkably, from isoetid dominance in 1936-38 to a diverse community dominated by Najas flexilis in 1979-80 to a less diverse community dominated by E. canadensis in 2004, with Potamogeton berchtoldii and Myriophyllum alterniflorum as lake-wide subdominants. Regardless of their abundance at the onset of the E. canadensis invasion, taxa whose cover-weighted mean depth overlapped with E. canadensis's in 1979-80 greatly reduced their abundance in 2004, shifted to deeper or shallow water or disappeared from sampling stations. Our survey indicates that E. canadensis may be the reason for the decrease of N. flexilis, likely through depletion of CO 2 in the water column and reduced nutrients in sediments. The abilities to survive and grow in periodically exposed shallow areas, combined with minor herbivory by waterfowl, are likely important factors for the increase of M. alterniflorum in Steinsfjord's shallow waters.
Enhanced growth of aquatic macrophytes have been recorded from some Norwegian rivers regulated for generating hydropower, and reducing the aquatic vegetation to manageable levels is desirable. Weir building is a common practice on Norwegian low flow reaches, but this in turn can result in silting and nuisance growth of macrophytes. Using herbicides to treat aquatic systems is not allowed by the Norwegian environmental authorities and alternative methods of macrophyte control have to be employed. In contrast, many regulated rivers and reservoirs are devoid of macrophytes and the management aim then is to restore native aquatic vegetation. Mechanical methods using harvesters and cutting devices are often difficult to implement in running water. Better results have been achieved utilizing flushing flows to scour sediments and associated macrophytes. Using a sharply peaking flow gives a more efficient control of excessive macrophyte growth because only the initial surge actively scours the river bed. Moss quantities flushed out in a number of controlled flows exhibited a strong log–linear relationship to significant flow, Q *, in River Suldalslågen, south‐western Norway. Temporarily halting hydroelectric facilities during cold spells to drain the river and thereby expose submerged macrophytes to frost, has been applied to the River Otra in southern Norway. An attendant ice run resulted in heavy loss of macrophytes in this river. The benefit of winter draw‐downs combined with flushing flow is partly offset by downstream accumulation of the removed plants. The potential to revegetate shores of reservoirs and impoundments has been studied in Meltingen, a regulated lake in mid‐Norway. This field study indicates that amending the shore substrate by light dressing with fertilizer results in enhanced survival of amphibious species. This study also demonstrates the need for sediment seed banks or nearby sanctuaries from which aquatic species can extend into the reservoir during years with a favourable high water level. Reducing the designated fluctuation range of reservoir elevation from 7 to 1.6 m resulted in recolonization by submerged macrophytes in Hartevatn, a reservoir on the upper River Otra.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.