The U1, U2, U4/U6, and U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) involved in pre-mRNA splicing contain seven Sm proteins (B/B', D1, D2, D3, E, F, and G) in common, which assemble around the Sm site present in four of the major spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs). These proteins share a common sequence motif in two segments, Sm1 and Sm2, separated by a short variable linker. Crystal structures of two Sm protein complexes, D3B and D1D2, show that these proteins have a common fold containing an N-terminal helix followed by a strongly bent five-stranded antiparallel beta sheet, and the D1D2 and D3B dimers superpose closely in their core regions, including the dimer interfaces. The crystal structures suggest that the seven Sm proteins could form a closed ring and the snRNAs may be bound in the positively charged central hole.

Small heat shock proteins (sHsps) are a conserved protein family, with members found in all organisms analysed so far. Several sHsps have been shown to exhibit chaperone activity and protect proteins from irreversible aggregation in vitro. Here we show that Hsp26, an sHsp from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is a temperature-regulated molecular chaperone. Like other sHsps, Hsp26 forms large oligomeric complexes. At heat shock temperatures, however, the 24mer chaperone complex dissociates. Interestingly, chaperone assays performed at different temperatures show that the dissociation of the Hsp26 complex at heat shock temperatures is a prerequisite for efficient chaperone activity. Binding of non-native proteins to dissociated Hsp26 produces large globular assemblies with a structure that appears to be completely reorganized relative to the original Hsp26 oligomers. In this complex one monomer of substrate is bound per Hsp26 dimer. The temperature-dependent dissociation of the large storage form of Hsp26 into a smaller, active species and the subsequent re-association to a defined large chaperone-substrate complex represents a novel mechanism for the functional activation of a molecular chaperone.

The crystal structure of the actin-binding region of utrophin suggests that these actin-binding domains may be more flexible than was previously thought and that this flexibility may allow domain reorganisation and play a role in the actin-binding mechanism. Thus utrophin could possibly bind to actin in an extended conformation so that the sites previously identified as being important for actin binding may be directly involved in this interaction.

Chaperone proteins assist in the folding of some newly synthesized proteins and inhibit protein aggregation. The Thermoanaerobacter brockii chaperonin proteins (Tbr-EL and Tbr-ES) have recently been purified and characterized [Truscott, W.N., Høj, P. B., & Scopes, R. K. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 222, 277-284]; Tbr-EL was a single seven-membered toroid, unlike most GroELs which exist as double toroids. Using high-resolution gel filtration chromatography, we have resolved the purified Tbr-EL into single ringed (Tbr-EL7) and double ringed (Tbr-EL14) species. The latter contained tightly bound Tbr-ES co-chaperonin (Tbr-EL14.Tbr-ES7). In the presence of Mg.ATP and either Escherichia coli GroES (Eco-ES) or Tbr-ES (i.e., under protein folding conditions), the isolated Tbr-EL7 rapidly dimerized to the Tbr-EL14.Eco-ES7 or Tbr-EL14.Tbr-ES7 complexes. The doubly toroidal species thus formed contained > or = 6 molecules tightly bound ADP and one GroES7 and are similar to the asymmetric chaperonin complex isolated from Thermus thermophilus [Taguch, H., Konishi, J., Ishii, N., & Yoshida, M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 22411-22418]. The isolated Tbr-EL7 and Tbr-EL14.Tbr-ES7 hydrolyzed ATP at approximate to 2 and 1 min-1, respectively. Addition of a molar excess of Eco-ES7 to the isolated Tbr-EL7 reduced the ATPase activity to 1 min-1, consistent with the formation of Tbr-EL14.Eco-ES7. Eco-ES7 failed to inhibit the Tbr-El14.Tbr-ES7 complex. The isolated Tbr-EL14.Tbr-ES7 complex did not support the folding of Rubisco under nonpermissive conditions. Only when the complex was supplemental with additional GroES was folding of Rubisco observed; i.e., one molar equivalent of GroES was not sufficient for folding. Both Tbr-EL7 and Tbr-EL14.Tbr-ES7 bound on unfolded [35S] Rhodospirillum rubrum Rubisco per mole particle. In contrast, Eco-EL14 bound 2 mol of protein per mole particle, consistent with each toroid having a peptide binding site. Eco-EL14.Eco-ES7 complex only bound one unfolded protein, thus GroES binding blocks one GroEL peptide binding site. Addition of Eco-ES7 to a Eco-EL14.Rubisco2 complex did not result in the displacement of one molecule of Rubisco but in the formation of a ternary Eco-EL14.Rubisco2.Eco-ES7 complex.

The spliceosome is a macromolecular machine that carries out the excision of introns from eukaryotic pre-mRNAs and splicing together of exons. Four large RNA-protein complexes, called the U1, U2, U4/U6 and U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), and some non-snRNP proteins assemble around three short conserved sequences within the intron in an ordered manner to form the active spliceosome. We aim to provide insight into the molecular details of the mechanism of pre-mRNA splicing through crystallographic studies of the snRNPs. We have solved the X-ray crystal structure of some snRNP proteins as part of either protein-protein complexes or RNA-protein complexes. These structures have provided an important insight into the overall architecture of the U1 and U2 snRNPs and the mechanisms of RNA-protein and protein-protein recognition.

No abstract

The spliceosome is a macromolecular machine that carries out the excision of introns from eukaryotic pre-mRNAs and splicing together of exons. Four large RNA-protein complexes, called the U1, U2, U4/U6 and US small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), and some nonsnRNP proteins assemble around three short conserved sequences within the intron in an ordered manner to form the active spliceosome. We aim to provide insight into the molecular details of the mechanism of pre-mRNA splicing through crystallographic studies of the snRNPs. We have solved the X-ray crystal structure of some snRNP proteins as part of either proteinprotein complexes or RNA-protein complexes. These structures have provided an important insight into the overall architecture of the U1 and U2 snRNPs and the mechanisms of RNA-protein and protein-protein recognition.

No abstract