CBF and StiO2 reproducibly increased by controlled hypercapnia of up to 60 mmHg even during the period of the maximum expected vasospasm. The absence of a rebound effect within the first hour after hypercapnia indicates that an improvement of the protocol is possible. The intervention may yield a therapeutic potential to prevent ischemic deficits after aneurysmal SAH.
Anterior corpectomy and fusion by a PEEK-cage and plate-screw osteosynthesis resulted in clinical improvement in all patients. Bony fusion was achieved in all patients in the long run. PEEK cages are allegedly less rigid than other xenografts. Similar to those, however, their use bears the risk of early cage-dislocation and subsidence. A comparison of industrial xenografts and autologous bone implants is required to challenge the different fusion techniques.
OBJECTAnterior cervical corpectomy with fusion has become the most widely used procedure for the treatment of multilevel cervical stenosis. Although an autologous bone graft is the gold standard for vertebral replacement after corpectomy, industrial implants have become popular because they result in no donor-site morbidity. In this study, the authors compared clinical and radiological results of autologous iliac grafts versus those of bone-filled polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) cage implants.METHODSThe clinical and radiological data of 46 patients with degenerative multilevel cervical stenosis and who underwent 1- or 2-level anterior median corpectomy between 2004 and 2012 were analyzed. The patients in Group 1 were treated with vertebral replacement with an autologous iliac graft, and those in Group 2 were treated with a PEKK cage implant. Each patient also underwent osteosynthesis with an anterior plate-screw system. Visual analog scale (VAS) and European Myelopathy Scale scores, loss of height and regional cervical lordosis angle, and complication rates of the 2 groups were compared.RESULTSThe mean follow-up time was 20 months. In both groups, the VAS and European Myelopathy Scale scores improved significantly. The loss of height was 3.7% in patients with iliac grafts and 5.3% in patients with PEKK implants. The rates of osseous fusion were similar in Groups 1 and 2 (94.7% and 91.3%, respectively). At the end of the follow-up period, none of the patients complained about donor-site pain. One patient in Group 1 suffered a fracture of the iliac bone that required osteosynthesis. Four patients in Group 2 had to receive revision surgery for cage and/or plate-screw dislocation and new neurological deficit or intractable pain.CONCLUSIONSPreoperative pain and radicularand myelopathic symptoms improve after decompression irrespective of the material used for vertebral replacement. The use of PEKK cages for vertebral replacement seems to result in a higher risk of implant-related complications. A prospective randomized study is necessary to supply evidence for the use of autografts and artificial implants after anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion.
Concerning renal function, the first days after SAH seem to be a vulnerable phase in which a variety of interventions are performed, including contrast-enhanced neuroradiologic procedures. In this period, HES 6% 130/0.4 should be administered with caution. However, no patient suffered from renal failure and required temporary or permanent renal replacement therapy. These results suggest that the administration of HES 6% 130/0.4 is safe in SAH patients without preexisting renal insufficiency.
In unclear cases of degenerative disorders of the cervical spine, particularly multilevel stenosis, myelography and MCT add relevant information for therapeutic decisions in more than a quarter of the patients in comparison with MRI as the sole diagnostic modality, and changes therapeutic strategies. However, a significant part of the information drawn out of myelography and MCT can be obtained by a completion of noninvasive examinations (native CT and radiographs).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.