This chapter begins with a description of the three layers of administrative law in Europe. It then discusses the elements of the European administrative law system and the conditions of the Europeanization of law. It considers whether or not an approximation by general harmonization is likely or even advisable.
The judgment of the European Court of Justice in the Case Åkerberg Fransson expresses the current position of the Court with respect to the binding effect of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights on the member states which has been understood as a challenge to domestic constitutional courts. Indeed, the decision starts from a wide understanding of Article 51 CFR according to which the member states are bound by the rights of the Charter "only when they are implementing Union law". However, the judgment neither means a change of the Court´s jurisprudence nor an untenably extensive reading of Article 51 CFR. Furthermore, the outcome is not surprising that the European judiciary would like to see EU fundamental rights applied in a case which concerns the common value added tax system of the Union and therefore a substantial proportion of the Union's own financial resources. Premature critical reactions notwithstanding, the relationship between the ECJ and municipal constitutional or supreme courts will remain unchanged.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.