Suggested guidelines for the development and evaluation of sampling and analytical methods for industrial hygiene monitoring have recently been published in a NIOSH technical report. These guidelines are based in part on various published approaches for method development and evaluation and serve as an attempt at a more unified experimental approach. This paper presents some salient features of this unified approach for method development and evaluation. The basic goal of the approach is to determine if the method under study meets the criterion to produce a result that fell within 25% of the true value 95 times out of 100 on average, although other factors of method performance are evaluated. The experiments proposed for the evaluation of method performance include determination of analytical recovery from the sampler, sampler capacity, storage stability of samples and effect of environmental factors. Evaluation criteria for the experimental data and procedures for the calculation of method bias, precision and accuracy are also included.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) conducted 21 field surveys in selected industries to characterize workers' exposures to hexavalent chromium-containing airborne particulate and to evaluate existing technologies for controlling these exposures. Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is a respiratory irritant and chronic inhalation may cause lung cancer. Primary evaluation methods included collection of full work shift, personal breathing-zone (PBZ) air samples for Cr(VI), measurement of ventilation system parameters, and documentation of processes and work practices. This study emphasized evaluation of engineering exposure control measures, so PBZ exposures were measured on the outside of personal protective equipment, for example, respirators. Field surveys were conducted in two chromium electroplating facilities, including one where full-shift PBZ exposures to Cr(VI) ranged from 3.0 to 16 times the 1 micro g/m(3)NIOSH recommended exposure limit (REL) despite several engineering controls on the plating tanks. At a painting and coating facility that used Cr(VI)-containing products, full-shift exposures of painters and helpers (2.4 to 55 micro g/m(3)) exceeded the REL, but LEV effectiveness was limited. Other operations evaluated included welding in construction; metal cutting operations on chromium-containing materials in ship breaking; chromate-paint removal with abrasive blasting; atomized alloy-spray coating; foundry operations; printing; and the manufacture of refractory brick, colored glass, prefabricated concrete products, and treated wood products. NIOSH researchers concluded that, in many of the evaluated processes, Cr(VI) exposures at or below the current NIOSH REL are achievable. However, for some processes, it is unclear whether controlling exposures to this range is consistently achievable without respirator use. Some operations involving the application of coatings and finishes may be among those most difficult to control to this range. Most operations judged to be moderately difficult to control to this range involve joining and cutting metals with relatively high chromium content. Nonetheless, exposures in a wide variety of other processes were judged more easily controllable to the current REL or below, or were found to be minimal, including some operations meeting the general descriptions named above but with different specific operating parameters producing lower Cr(VI) exposures.
Gaseous and particulate emissions from laser surgery are often controlled by the use of smoke evacuators. Thus it is important that factors affecting the performance of these evacuators be understood. In this study, a tracer gas technique was used to examine a number of factors affecting the performance of smoke evacuators, including evacuator flow rate, distance from the evacuator nozzle to the surgical site, and direction and speed of external air flow in relation to nozzle flow. The tracer gas technique allowed the release of emissions to be visualized with infrared imaging and also allowed the collection efficiency to be assessed quantitatively. The results were demonstrated with the use of a surgical laser system. It was found that the collection efficiency of the smoke evacuator was affected by all the factors studied. Increasing the evacuator flow rate allowed the collection of emissions under conditions in which lower evacuator flow rates had less efficient collection. The speed and direction of external air flow affected collection of emissions greatly. If the air flow was in the same direction as the nozzle flow, efficient collection of emissions at a distance from the emission release point was observed. However, at other angles relative to nozzle flow, the efficiency degraded rapidly with distance from the emission release site. With the use of the surgical laser system, at laser powers of 30 W, the tracer system predicted the collection of emissions. At 60 and 100 W of laser power, higher external air flows and greater attention to nozzle positioning were necessary. Based on the results of this study, conclusions are drawn on how to improve the collection efficiency of smoke evacuators used in laser surgery.
Exposure to combustion products from wildland fires causes respiratory irritation and decreased lung function among firefighters. The authors evaluated carbon monoxide (CO) exposures of a group of wildland firefighters who conducted prescribed burns in the southeastern United States of America. A total of 149 person-days of samples were collected using data logging CO monitors. A questionnaire was administered to collect data on job tasks and self-reported smoke exposure. Overall, the highest exposures were seen amongst firefighters assigned to holding and mop-up tasks (geometric mean [GM]: 2.6 ppm), whereas the lowest were associated with lighting and jobs such as burn boss (GM: 1.6 and 0.3 ppm, respectively). The self-reported smoke exposure showed a significant linear trend with increasing CO exposure. The numbers of acres burned or burn duration, however, were not good predictors of exposure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.