In this double-blind multicentre study, using the intention-to-treat approach, a total of 293 patients with fever (> or = 38.5 degrees C), symptoms of sepsis and signs of pneumonia or pyelonephritis were randomly assigned to treatment with ampicillin and mecillinam (A+M) or cefotaxime followed by cefadroxil. In the febrile phase, treatment was given intravenously twice daily, either with 1,200 mg ampicillin together with 600 mg mecillinam or with 2 g cefotaxime alone. When the patients stayed afebrile, the intravenous administration was replaced by oral treatment twice daily for 14 days, either with 500 mg pivampicillin and 400 mg pivmecillinam or 1 g cefadroxil. In the A+M group, 33% (48/144) of the patients did not complete the full course of treatment as compared with 32% (47/149) in the cephalosporin group, the reasons being treatment failure in 27 and 29, respectively, or adverse effects (n = 16 in both groups). The median duration of fever was 47 h in the A + M group and 50 h in the cephalosporin group. Of 135 patients with pneumonia, 68% were completely cured in the A + M group, and 65% in the cephalosporin group, the main reasons for treatment failure being Mycoplasma pneumonia or ornithosis. Of 136 patients with pyelonephritis, 63% were cured in each group. The main reason for failure was bacteriological relapse. Side-effects were reported by 32 patients (22%) of the A+M group, as compared with 41 (28%) of the cephalosporin group. Epigastric complaints were equally frequent in both groups, but there was a tendency for a higher frequency of exanthema in the A+M group, and for antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and fungal superinfections in the cephalosporin group.
This double-blind, multicentre study was performed at nine centres on a total of 171 patients who presented with fever (> 38.5 degrees C) and signs of acute pyelonephritis. All were initially treated with intravenous cefuroxime. After 2-3 d, when the fever had subsided and urinary culture had revealed growth of Gram-negative bacteria ( > 10(7) colony-forming units per litre), treatment was changed to oral administration of ceftibuten 200 mg b.i.d. or norfloxacin 400 mg b.i.d. for 10 d. The patients were followed for signs of bacterial or clinical relapse 7-14 d after the end of treatment. The initial clinical and bacteriological cure was excellent in both groups, but there were significantly fewer bacterial relapses after oral treatment with norfloxacin than with ceftibuten in acute febrile pyelonephritis initially treated with intravenous cefuroxime. The causal strain was eradicated in 75% of patients (73% of males, 76% of females) in the ceftibuten group and in 89% of patients (94% of males, 85% of females) in the norfloxacin group. The relative frequency of eradication was 0.84 (p < 0.05; 95%, confidence interval 0.74-0.97). Adverse events were reported by 47% of the patients in the ceftibuten group and by 38% in the norfloxacin group. This difference was not significant, but diarrhoea or loose stools occurred more frequently in the ceftibuten group.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.