BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The American Academy of Pediatrics endorses screening for social determinants of health (SDOH) and providing families resources for unmet needs. A systematic response to unmet needs requires identification, documentation, and provision of resources. Our goal was to compare SDOH International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10), code use for pediatric inpatients after policy changes in 2018 permitting coding by nonphysicians. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing data from the 2016 and 2019 Kid’s Inpatient Database for patients <21 years old. The primary variable was the presence of an SDOH code, defined as an ICD-10 Z-code (Z55–Z65) or 1 of 13 ICD-10 codes recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. We compared overall SDOH code usage between 2016 and 2019, and by Z-code category, demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics using χ2 tests and odds ratios. Using logistic regression, we examined hospital-level characteristics for hospitals with >5% of discharges with an SDOH code. RESULTS: SDOH code documentation increased from 1.4% in 2016 to 1.9% in 2019 (P < .001), with no notable differences based on Z-code category. In both periods, SDOH code documentation was more common in adolescents, Native Americans, and patients with mental health diagnoses. The number of all hospitals using any SDOH code increased nearly 8% between 2016 and 2019. CONCLUSIONS: ICD-10 codes remain underused to track SDOH needs within the inpatient pediatric setting. Future research should explore whether SDOH code documentation is associated with increased response to unmet social needs and, if so, how to improve use of SDOH codes by all providers.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and implementation of a Peer Curbside Consult Service (PCCS) for a pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) division. METHODS: We developed a pilot intervention with hospitalists at a freestanding children’s hospital to provide peer consultation services for challenging clinical cases. Postconsultation surveys collected from both the requesting and consulting hospitalists provided feedback about the program. The 12-point Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist is used to describe the process for program creation and implementation. RESULTS: The PCCS has provided 60 consultations in the first 2 years since implementation in April 2020 and supports a large PHM division with >75 members who practice at a tertiary care, freestanding children’s hospital and 7 affiliate sites. Hospitalists request peer consultation for challenging clinical cases. The consultations were typically conducted in person or via telephone. Currently, 11 PHM faculty members within the division volunteer as consultants, with 2 assigned per week. Electronic postconsultation experience surveys were received from 70% of requesting and 89% of consultant hospitalists. We also provide preliminary data from this pilot intervention in the Supplemental Information. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully established a peer consult service that provided just-in-time clinical decision support across the various practice sites. Through transparent reporting using the TIDieR checklist, other divisions may be able to replicate and adapt their own peer consult program.
OBJECTIVE: The pediatric sepsis literature lacks studies examining the inpatient setting, yet sepsis remains a leading cause of death in children’s hospitals. More information is needed about sepsis arising in patients already hospitalized to improve morbidity and mortality outcomes. This study describes the clinical characteristics, process measures, and outcomes of inpatient sepsis cases compared with emergency department (ED) sepsis cases within the Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes data registry from 46 hospitals that care for children. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes sepsis cases from January 2017 to December 2019 with onset in inpatient or ED. We used descriptive statistics to compare inpatient and ED sepsis metrics and describe inpatient sepsis outcomes. RESULTS: The cohort included 26 855 cases; 8.4% were inpatient and 91.6% were ED. Inpatient cases had higher sepsis-attributable mortality (2.0% vs 1.4%, P = .025), longer length of stay after sepsis recognition (9 vs 5 days, P <.001), more intensive care admissions (57.6% vs 54.1%, P = .002), and greater average vasopressor use (18.0% vs 13.6%, P <.001) compared with ED. In the inpatient cohort, >40% of cases had a time from arrival to recognition within 12 hours. In 21% of cases, this time was >96 hours. Improved adherence to sepsis treatment bundles over time was associated with improved 30-day sepsis-attributable mortality for inpatients with sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient sepsis cases had longer lengths of stay, more need for intensive care, and higher vasopressor use. Sepsis-attributable mortality was significantly higher in inpatient cases compared with ED cases and improved with improved sepsis bundle adherence.
BACKGROUND: Although there has been much research on screening families for social determinants of health (SDOH) at pediatric outpatient visits, there is little data on family preferences about SDOH screening during hospitalization. This is of critical importance because unmet SDOH, also known as social needs, are associated with poor health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess caregiver preferences for social needs screening in the inpatient pediatric setting. METHODS: We surveyed a sample of caregivers of admitted patients at our freestanding tertiary-care children’s hospital between March 2021 and January 2022. Caregivers were surveyed with respect to the importance of screening, their comfort with screening, and which domains were felt to be acceptable for screening. RESULTS: We enrolled 160 caregivers. More than 60% of caregivers were comfortable being screened for each of the social needs listed. Between 40% and 50% found screening acceptable, even if resources were unavailable. Forty-five percent preferred to be screened in private, 9% preferred to be screened by a health care team member, and 37% were comfortable being screened either in private or with a health care team member. Electronic screening was the most preferred modality (44%), and if by a health care team member, social workers were preferred over others. CONCLUSIONS: Many caregivers reported the acceptance of and comfort with social needs screening in the inpatient setting. Our findings may help inform future hospital-wide social needs screening efforts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.