The commercial board game Cranium is the inspiration
for an educational exercise developed for both undergraduate and graduate
teaching assistants (TAs) in chemistry. Catalyze! has been used to highlight the value of game-based active learning
while serving as a review of factors that influence undergraduate
students’ persistence and success in chemistry studies, as
well as teaching techniques and resources TAs can draw on to help
students realize their academic potential. Players are challenged
to consider common teaching and learning scenarios under five card
categories: study strategies, prior knowledge and misconceptions,
motivation and mindset, classroom climate, and social and personal
issues. Overall, TAs appreciate the engagement and insights afforded
them by the game. Catalyze! scenarios can be easily
customized across disciplines and for use at other institutions, and
the game can be incorporated in a variety of TA professional development
contexts.
Institutions have increasingly made the commitment to diversify higher education, and faculty play integral roles in creating an inclusive culture and learning environments. Our study asks: How do faculty conceptualize diversity in higher education, and how do these conceptions influence curriculum and instruction? Using phenomenography as the theoretical and methodological framework, we examined the qualitatively different ways in which faculty experience and understand diversity. These ways of understanding are organized into a phenomenographic outcome space with specific aspects that describe the phenomenon of diversity and variations within each aspect that distinguish the individual experiences. Data were collected through semi‐structured interviews with 30 faculty from two‐year and four‐year minority‐serving institutions. Transcripts were analyzed using grounded theory, and data were coded by two independent researchers to ensure reliability and analyzed by four researchers with diverse positionalities to support validity. Qualitative codes were constructed to capture how each participant described diversity. Five aspects were identified from our data: student features, legitimized membership, intelligence mindset, faculty role, and learning environment. Variations among experiences were organized into an outcome space with three distinct conceptions of diversity. In Conception I (which we termed essentialist), faculty attend to demographic features of students and view students with a fixed mindset of intelligence and as outsiders to higher education. This is aligned with equal treatments of all students and a curriculum approach that considers diversity as an impediment to learning. In Conception II (functionalist), faculty attend to different student viewpoints and consider students with a deficit mindset and as guests who transiently pass through higher education institutions. This is aligned with accommodations for student needs and a curriculum approach that supports struggling students. Conception III (existentialist) includes and expands on Conception II by attending to how lived experiences intersect with demographic features and viewpoints to shape the kinds of learners that individual students become in the classroom. Implicit power dynamics are considered, and students are viewed as rightfully present in higher education regardless of their backgrounds. Specific curriculum approaches are intentionally implemented to foster productive conversations around different student characteristics and to center social justice issues, and diversity enriches learning in the classroom. Overall, our results indicate that faculty acknowledge different student features and have varying understanding for what diversity means and why it is important in higher education, and some conceptions of diversity do not necessarily suggest an inclusive culture.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.