ABSTRACT.Purpose: To evaluate the feelings and experiences of patients living with glaucoma. Methods: A questionnaire was delivered to patients willing to take part, at a regular visit to their ophthalmologist, for filling in anonymously at home. A total of 589 questionnaires were returned. Results: More than 80% reported negative emotions on learning that they had glaucoma, one-third were afraid of going blind. Half the patients had no visual problem at all, 14% complained of poor or very poor vision. This proportion increased with age. One-fourth of the patients on topical medication experienced adverse effects of moderate or high degree. About half the patients being treated with laser or surgery felt their situation had improved afterwards. Nine-tenths of the individuals were satisfied with the information and care given, although their knowledge about glaucoma was rather incomplete. One-fifth missed information, mainly on causes, treatment and prognosis of the disease. The younger patients were more anxious and inquiring, reported more side effects and were less satisfied than the older patients. The women were in general more dissatisfied than the men. Conclusion: Giving a patient a diagnosis of glaucoma influences his quality of life negatively. Only half of our patients experienced any visual difficulties, whereas one-fourth reported adverse reactions due to the therapy. Most of the patients were very satisfied with the information and care given. Ophthalmologists in private practice are quite central in the management and care of the glaucoma patients in a medical setting like ours.

ABSTRACT.Purpose: To elucidate the relationship between the visual difficulties reported by patients treated for glaucoma and their objective functional damage, and to evaluate the reliability of the patient responses. Methods: Questionnaires concerning quality of life filled in at home by 589 patients treated for chronic open angle glaucoma were correlated to corresponding questionnaires returned from their ophthalmologists. Results: Few of our patients had a visual field damage judged to be of functional significance. There was a weak to moderate association between both visual field defects and decreased visual acuity and self-reported visual difficulties. A high proportion of the patients had normal binocular visual field and a stable disease, raising the suspicion that some of them were treated for ocular hypertension. The agreement between the responses from the patients and the ophthalmologists concerning the topical treatment was good, regarding treatment duration and other diseases of the patients the agreement was moderate. Conclusion:The association between subjective visual disability and presence of visual field defects was weak to moderate in our patients treated for glaucoma, and this association was further weakened by adjusting for visual acuity. Some patients might be treated unnecessarily, and a favourable prognosis might be given to most of them. The reliability of the patients in general was good.Key words: glaucoma -quality of life -visual field defect -visual acuity -questionnaire -reliability.

We studied relations between psychophysical visual function and grade of retinopathy, glycemic control and clinical background data in 51 insulin-dependent diabetic patients, aged 17-47 years. Three separate qualities of visual function were examined, macular recovery time (nyctometry; 2 min adaptation), contrast sensitivity (Vistech 6000 chart; between 1.5 and 18 cycles per degree (cpd)) and colour vision (Fletcher DS8; protan/deutan and tritan). Only contrast sensitivity of 6 cpd was associated with the grade of retinopathy; reduced function was found in patients with retinopathy compared to those without. No correlations between macular recovery, contrast sensitivity and colour vision were found. None of the visual functions was significantly related to glycemic control, age, duration of diabetes, blood pressure, intraocular pressure, or urinary albumin excretion. Our data suggests that the neurosensory function of contrast sensitivity correlates more sensitively to the grade of diabetic retinopathy than macular recovery and colour vision. Cross-sectional assessments of different psychophysical visual functions seem to be of restricted clinical value as indicators of preceding glycemic control in diabetic patients with no or mild nonproliferative retinopathy.

We compared neurosensorial visual function by psychophysical tests (macular recovery time and contrast sensitivity) in two well matched groups of young Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with micro- and normoalbuminuria, respectively. The patients had normal visual acuity (> or = 1.0) and either no retinopathy or non-proliferative retinopathy. Thirty patients with microalbuminuria (albumin excretion > or = 15 micrograms/min in a least two out of three timed overnight urine samples) were matched (age, diabetes duration, mean one-year HbA1c, gender) with normoalbuminuric (n = 27) patients. Retinopathy (50 degree colour fundus photography) was assessed by counting microaneurysms and hemorrhages as 'red spots'. Contrast sensitivity was examined for the spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 18 cycles per degree (cpd). Macular recovery time (nyctometry) refers to the time-related (2 min) ability of the retina to regain visual acuity following exposure to bright light (photostress). Contrast sensitivity score was reduced in patients with microalbuminuria compared to those without; 18 cpd (mean and 95% confidence intervals): [4.2 (3.8-4.7) vs 5.0 (4.6-5.4), p = 0.03]. Macular recovery performance was not significantly reduced: [21.0 arbitrary units (17.5-24.6) vs 26.0 (22.6-30.7), p = 0.12]. We conclude that impaired contrast sensitivity independent of background retinopathy is shown in a group of young Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with low-grade microalbuminuria compared to a group of patients with normoalbuminuria.