Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are an increasingly common chronic liver disease closely associated with diabetes and obesity that have reached epidemic proportions. Reports on the prevalence of NAFLD have suggested that 27-34 % of the general population in the USA and 40-90 % of the obese population worldwide have this disease. Increasing urbanisation rate and associated inappropriate lifestyle changes are not only the risk factors of diabetes, but also unmask genetic predisposition in various populations for the metabolic syndrome and its manifestations including NAFLD and NASH. Lifestyle modifications and balanced nutrition are among the foremost management strategies along with ursodeoxycholic acid, metformin, vitamin E and pentoxifylline. Although weight reduction associated with current therapeutic strategies has shown some promise, maintaining it in the long run is largely unsuccessful. With the safety of pharmacotherapy still being uncertain and can be started only after confirmation, other reasonable interventions such as nutrition hold promise in preventing disease progression. The role of dietary components including branchedchain amino acids, methionine, choline and folic acid is currently being evaluated in various clinical trials. Nutritional approaches sought to overcome the limitations of pharmacotherapy also include evaluating the effects of natural ingredients, such as silymarin and spirulina, on liver disease. Understanding the specific interaction between nutrients and dietary needs in NAFLD and maintaining this balance through either a diet or a nutritional product thus becomes extremely important in providing a more realistic and feasible alternative to treat NAFLD. A planned complete nutritional combination addressing specific needs and helping to prevent the progression of NAFLD is the need of the hour to avert people from ending up with complications.

BackgroundThere is a need for better control of head louse infestations. Abametapir is an inhibitor of metalloproteinases critical for louse survival and egg development. The efficacy of abametapir lotion, 0.74%, was assessed for its ability to clear head louse infestations after a single application.MethodsTwo randomized, double‐blind, multicenter, vehicle‐controlled studies were conducted in subjects aged 6 months and older to compare the effectiveness of abametapir lotion versus vehicle control for eliminating head louse infestations without nit combing. Abametapir lotion was applied to dry hair for 10 minutes on day 0 and then rinsed with water. The primary endpoint was the proportion of index subjects (youngest household member with ≥ 3 live lice at screening) in the intent‐to‐treat population who were louse free at all follow‐up visits through day 14. Older household members with one or more live lice at screening were designated as nonindex subjects and treated as per the index subject within their household.ResultsIn the intent‐to‐treat population (index subjects, N = 216), 81.5% of subjects treated with abametapir lotion were louse free through day 14 after a single treatment, versus 49.1% with vehicle (P < 0.001). For the combined index and nonindex population (N = 704), 85.9% were louse free through day 14 in the abametapir group, versus 61.3% in the vehicle group (P < 0.001). The most frequently reported adverse events were erythema (4.0%), rash (3.2%), and skin burning sensation (2.6%).ConclusionAbametapir lotion, 0.74%, was effective at clearing active head louse infestations through day 14 in subjects aged 6 months and older. All adverse events (including one serious but unrelated to study drug) resolved uneventfully.

Few head lice treatments have demonstrated effectiveness against louse eggs. Abametapir, a metalloproteinase inhibitor, is able to target metalloproteinases critical to egg hatching and louse development. In this double-blind, phase 2 study, 50 subjects aged ≥3 years with active head lice infestation were randomized to receive a single treatment of abametapir lotion, 0.74%, or vehicle (control), applied to scalp and hair for 10 minutes. Ovicidal efficacy was measured by recording the hatch rate of eggs collected from each subject’s hair before and after treatment and incubated for 14 days. With abametapir, 100% of treated eggs remained unhatched compared with 64.0% for vehicle. Accounting for pretreatment hatch rates, the absolute reduction in egg hatching was 92.9% for abametapir versus 42.3% for vehicle ( P < .0001). The most frequently reported adverse event was rash (16%). Abametapir lotion, 0.74%, demonstrated significant ovicidal activity against head lice eggs with a single application.

Introduction: Clobetasol propionate (0.05% standard dose formulation), a topical corticosteroid, leads to systemic side-effects like hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression at doses as low as 2 g/day. The aim of this study was to evaluate HPA axis suppression, efficacy, and safety of clobetasol propionate (0.025%, formulation 5 and 13) versus currently marketed 0.05% cream in Indian patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Methods: In this phase 2a investigator-blinded study, patients aged C 18 years with moderateto-severe psoriasis were randomized 1:1:1 to receive clobetasol propionate 0.025% formulation 5, or 13, or 0.05% cream; twice daily for 28 days. Safety endpoints included adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) test results at day 28 (primary), and local tolerability at each visit (burning/stinging/pruritus, secondary). Efficacy endpoints included Psoriasis Global Assessment (PGA) score. Results: Overall, 88 patients received clobetasol propionate 0.025% formulation 5 and 13 (n = 29 for both) and 0.05% cream (n = 30). At day 28, the proportion of patients with an abnormal ACTH stimulation test (cortisol levels B 18 lg/dl) was numerically lower in 0.025% formulations: 5 (20.7%) and 13 (17.2%) compared with 0.05% cream (30.0%), (p = 0.320). Decrease in burning/stinging /pruritus scores were comparable in all treatment groups and PGA success rates were higher with 0.025% formulations: 5 (38.9%) and 13 (36.8%) compared with 0.05% cream (30.8%). Conclusion: Clobetasol propionate 0.025% could be an effective treatment for moderate-tosevere psoriasis compared with 0.05% cream,