This pilot study investigated the potential to utilize adaptive treatment strategies for treating moderate to severe suicidal risk among college students. This article will describe the unique study design and report on feasibility and acceptability findings. A 2-stage Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) was conducted: In Stage 1, 62 suicidal college students were randomized to either a suicide-focused or a treatment-as-usual condition (4-8 weeks). Those deemed insufficient responders were re-randomized to one of two Stage 2 interventions-both suicide-focused but one comprehensive and multimodal and the other flexible and theoretically agnostic (4-16 additional weeks). Recruitment rates were high, treatment dropout levels were lower than expected for the setting, study dropouts were rare, and counselors were able to deliver suicide-focused approaches with fidelity. Treatment satisfaction was high among clients and moderately high among counselors. Findings from this pilot show that a SMART is highly feasible and acceptable to suicidal college students, counselors, and campuses.
Cultural diversity among older adults is increasing and with this comes challenges in health care needs, including the detection of cognitive impairment. Cognitive impairments manifests in many ways, with early symptoms often difficult to detect. Detecting cognitive dysfunction is typically facilitated with brief, portable screening tools. Scores on screening tools may be influenced by culture, education, and verbal abilities; in particular, these are acute issues for screening older immigrants from linguistically and culturally diverse backgrounds. The consequences of improper screening are high and, as such, finding practical, cost-effective solutions is of critical importance. In this project, we qualitatively examined the usability of different cognitive screening tools with the ultimate goal of improving the detection and classification of cognitive dysfunction among older adult immigrants. We extended our previous work by piloting adaptation guidelines for the Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) exam for use with linguistically and culturally diverse persons. We recruited 23 older immigrants (6 non-English speaking) and 14 U.S. born participants to explore the usability and test-retest reliability of the SLUMS exam administered with and without the adaptation guidelines. Our attempts to improve the flexibility of the SLUMS exam did not achieve the level of success as anticipated. Although this pilot work had low power, when coupled with our past work on developing adaptation guidelines, sheds critical light on the layered complexity that arises at the intersections of education, culture, race, gender, socioeconomic status, and intercultural interactions and the resulting potential directions for future work will be discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.