IMPORTANCE The lack of prospective randomized clinical trials demonstrating that full-body skin examination (FBSE) reduces melanoma morbidity or mortality has prompted an “I” rating from the United States Preventive Services Task Force for population-based skin cancer screening. More data on these screening programs are needed. OBJECTIVES To describe a skin cancer screening quality initiative in a large health care system and to determine if the intervention was associated with screening of a demographically higher-risk population than previous screening programs and if melanoma incidence and thickness differed in screened vs unscreened patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This observational evaluation of a prospectively implemented quality initiative was conducted in a large health care system in western Pennsylvania (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, UPMC) among adults seen in an office visit by a UPMC-employed primary care physician (PCP) in 2014. INTERVENTIONS Implementation of a campaign promoting annual skin cancer screening by FBSE, including training of PCPs, promotion of the initiative to physicians and patients, and modification of the electronic health record (EHR) to include FBSE as a recommended preventive service for patients 35 years or older. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Characteristics of screened and unscreened patients and melanomas detected among them. RESULTS Of 333 735 adult patients seen in an office visit by PCPs in 2014, 53 196 patients (15.9%of the screen-eligible population) received an FBSE, and 280 539 did not. Screened patients were slightly older (median age, 60 vs 57 years; P < .001) but did not differ significantly by sex (43.2%vs 43.1% men; P = .49) from the unscreened population. Fifty melanomas were diagnosed in screened patients and 104 melanomas were diagnosed in unscreened patients. Screened patients were more likely than unscreened patients to be diagnosed with melanoma (adjusted risk ratio [RR], 2.4; 95%CI, 1.7–3.4; P < .001) and to have a thinner invasive melanoma (median thickness, 0.37 mm vs 0.65 mm; P < .001). The incidence of melanoma lesions 1 mm or thicker was similar in screened vs unscreened patients (adjusted RR, 0.7; 95%CI, 02.–2.2; P = .52). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Large-scale screening for melanoma within a United States health care system is feasible and can result in increased detection of thinner melanomas. This intervention also resulted in screening of a higher proportion of men and an older patient population than previous screening interventions in which younger individuals and women predominated.
Several recent studies have reported a considerably higher overall survival (OS) rate in females in various geographic regions This study further investigates the characteristics of melanoma that contribute to OS of women residing in the United States. Chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression models were used to analyze differences in demographics, treatment, and survival of invasive cutaneous melanoma in men and women diagnosed from 2004 to 2016 in the National cancer database. In 316 966 patients met inclusion criteria. Men had a significantly higher median age of diagnosis at 61 years (interquartile range or IQR: 51-72) in comparison to women where the median age of diagnosis was 55 years (IQR: 43-68) (P < .0001). The most common primary site for men was the trunk (35.5%), whereas the lower extremities were the most common primary site for women (30.3%). Women had a higher 5 year (82.6%) and 10 year (73.1%) OS compared to 5 year and 10 year OS of 72.2% and 58.7%, respectively, in men (P < .0001). When adjusting for confounders, female gender was independently associated with improved OS (ref: male HR = 0.791; 95% confidence interval 0.773-0.809; P < .0001). Overall, we conclude that female gender is an independent favorable prognostic factor for melanoma survival.
Purpose of Review Dermatologists have been at the forefront of researching telemedicine to expand access to care. The current COVID-19 pandemic has prompted even greater expansion and implementation of teledermatology. This review discusses the research examining the potential impact of teledermatology addressing disparities in care. Recent Findings Teledermatology appears to increase access to dermatology given expanded means to deliver care. Specifically, recent studies have found increased access among Medicaid-insured, resource-poor urban and rural, and elderly populations. Teledermatology implementation also facilitates education among providers at different levels of training. Still, as some patients have inconsistent access to the required technology, increased reliance on telemedicine may also potentially increase disparities for some populations. Summary Teledermatology may serve to reduce disparities in health care access in many underserved and marginalized communities. Future research should continue to study implementation, especially given the expansion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ultimately, teledermatology may play an important role in ensuring equitable care access for all.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.