Background: Digital learning tools have proliferated among healthcare workers in India. Evidence of their effectiveness is however minimal. We sought to examine the impact of the Safe Delivery App (SDA) on knowledge and confidence among frontline health workers (HW) in India. We also studied whether facilitation to address technical challenges enhanced self-learning. Methods: Staff nurses and nurse-midwives from 30 facilities in two states were divided into control and intervention groups through randomization. Knowledge and confidence were assessed at baseline and after 6 months. Three rounds of facilitation addressing technical challenges in downloading and usage along with reminders about the next phase of learning were conducted in the intervention group. A user satisfaction scale along with qualitative interviews was conducted in the intervention group at the endline along with qualitative interviews on facilitation. Results: The knowledge and confidence of the healthcare workers significantly increased from the baseline to endline by 4 percentage points (P < 0.001). The participants who received facilitation had a higher mean score difference in knowledge and confidence compared to those who did not receive facilitation (P < 0.001). The participants were highly satisfied with the app and video was the most-watched feature. They reported a positive experience of the facilitation process. Conclusion: The effectiveness and acceptability of the SDA indicate the applicability of mHealth learning tools at the primary healthcare level. In a time of rapid digitalization of training, facilitation or supportive supervision needs further focus while on-ground digital training could be invested in to overcome digital illiteracy among healthcare workers.
Background: The effective implementation of evidence-based practices including the use of partograph to improve maternal and newborn outcomes is critical on account of increased institutional delivery. However, despite clear guidelines, partograph use in India is not widely practiced. Materials and Methods: Quality improvement (QI) efforts along with training and mentoring were operationalized in a total of 141 facilities across 26 high priority districts of India. Assessments were conducted across baseline, intervention period, and end line. These included reviewing the availability of partograph and staff competency in filling them at baseline and end line, as well as reviewing monthly data for use and completeness of filling. The monthly data were tabulated quarter wise to study trends. Competency scores were tabulated to show the difference across assessments. Results: An overall upward trend from 29% to 61% was seen in the practice of partograph use. Simultaneously, completeness in filling up the partograph increased from 32% to 81%. Staff competency in filling partograph improved considerably: proportion of staff scoring low decreased over the intervention period from 63% to 2.5% ( P < 0.0001), and the proportion scoring high increased from 13% to 72% ( P < 0.0001) from baseline to end line. Conclusion: The integrated approach of training, mentoring, and QI can be used in similar settings to strengthen partograph use.
Background The risk of mortality for the mother and the newborn is aggravated during birth in low- and middle-income countries due to preventable causes, which can be addressed with increased quality of care practices. One such practice is intrapartum fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring, which is crucial for the early detection of fetal ischemia, but is inadequately monitored in low- and middle-income countries. In India, there is currently a lack of sufficient data on FHR monitoring. Methods An assessment using facility records, interviews and observation was conducted in seven facilities providing tertiary, secondary or primary level care in aspirational districts of three states. The study sought to investigate the frequency of monitoring, devices used for monitoring and challenges in usage. Results FHR was not monitored as per standard protocol. Case sheets revealed 70% of labor was monitored at least once. Only 33% of observed cases were monitored every half hour during active labor, and none were monitored every 5 min during the second stage of labor. More time was observed for monitoring with a Doppler compared with a stethoscope, as providers reported fluctuation in readings. Reportedly, low audibility and a perceived need of expertise were associated with using a stethoscope. High case load and the time required for monitoring were reported as challenges in adhering to standard monitoring protocols. Conclusion The introduction of a standardized device and a short refresher training on the World Health Organization and skilled birth attendant protocols for FHR monitoring will improve usage and compliance.
Background: India’s neonatal and perinatal mortality is among the highest in the world. Intrapartum-related conditions contribute to a significant proportion of neonatal deaths and stillbirths. Fetal heart rate monitoring, a recommended norm to assess fetal well-bring, is not practiced as per standard guidelines in public health facilities. A standardized Doppler along with training on fetal heart rate monitoring was implemented across different levels of healthcare in three states. Methods: Facilities were selected purposively to implement the Doppler. Baseline data for 3 months were collected. Interviews of health providers and observation of labor were conducted quarterly. Data were analyzed through a comparison of baseline and intervention on a number of delivery and monitoring indicators. Results: Among 22,579 total deliveries, monitoring frequency increased along with increase in detection of abnormal fetal heart rate (FHR) while cesarean section and stillbirths reduced slightly. Cases never monitored reduced in the District Hospitals (7.98–2.07, P < 0.01) and in Community Health Centers (14.7–1.67, P < 0.001). Stillbirth rate reduced at the medical college (3.6–1.1, P < 0.001). Interviews with providers revealed acceptance of the device due to its reliable readings. Conclusion: The Doppler demonstrates acceptability and serves as a useful aid to improve intrapartum FHR monitoring.
Background: Fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring during intrapartum care is important; however, the use of Doppler during coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic needs to be investigated especially in light of the enhanced infection prevention (IP) required during labor and childbirth. The present study was carried out to evaluate the experience of using a handheld Doppler having both continuous and intermittent monitoring features in seven health facilities across three states. Materials and Methods:Program data including case load, frequency of monitoring, and fetal outcome was obtained from January to March 2020 were compared with data during the lockdown period from April to June 2020. A semi-structured questionnaire was used for a telephonic qualitative interview of eight service providers from the seven facilities to supplement the quantitative data. Transcripts were analyzed using ATLAS.ti to find out how the Doppler was being used. Results: There was decrease in the case load during lockdown; however, there was no decrease in the frequency of monitoring. There was no difference on rate of abnormal FHR detected, stillbirths, and asphyxia. IP protocol was followed in all facilities. The handheld Doppler was used by four facilities to continuously monitor pregnant women. While, study participants reported that strapping the belt for continuous monitoring reduced exposure to suspected COVID cases, two participants believed that strapping could be a risk factor for transmission. Conclusion: Usage of the Doppler for FHR detection can be used for monitoring progress during labor using IP protocol.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.