Copy number variants (CNVs) resulting from genomic deletions and duplications and common fragile sites (CFSs) seen as breaks on metaphase chromosomes are distinct forms of structural chromosome instability precipitated by replication inhibition. Although they share a common induction mechanism, it is not known how CNVs and CFSs are related or why some genomic loci are much more prone to their occurrence. Here we compare large sets of de novo CNVs and CFSs in several experimental cell systems to each other and to overlapping genomic features. We first show that CNV hotpots and CFSs occurred at the same human loci within a given cultured cell line. Bru-seq nascent RNA sequencing further demonstrated that although genomic regions with low CNV frequencies were enriched in transcribed genes, the CNV hotpots that matched CFSs specifically corresponded to the largest active transcription units in both human and mouse cells. Consistently, active transcription units >1 Mb were robust cell-type-specific predictors of induced CNV hotspots and CFS loci. Unlike most transcribed genes, these very large transcription units replicated late and organized deletion and duplication CNVs into their transcribed and flanking regions, respectively, supporting a role for transcription in replication-dependent lesion formation. These results indicate that active large transcription units drive extreme locus-and cell-type-specific genomic instability under replication stress, resulting in both CNVs and CFSs as different manifestations of perturbed replication dynamics.

Spontaneous copy number variant (CNV) mutations are an important factor in genomic structural variation, genomic disorders, and cancer. A major class of CNVs, termed nonrecurrent CNVs, is thought to arise by nonhomologous DNA repair mechanisms due to the presence of short microhomologies, blunt ends, or short insertions at junctions of normal and de novo pathogenic CNVs, features recapitulated in experimental systems in which CNVs are induced by exogenous replication stress. To test whether the canonical nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway of double-strand break (DSB) repair is involved in the formation of this class of CNVs, chromosome integrity was monitored in NHEJ–deficient Xrcc4 −/− mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells following treatment with low doses of aphidicolin, a DNA replicative polymerase inhibitor. Mouse ES cells exhibited replication stress-induced CNV formation in the same manner as human fibroblasts, including the existence of syntenic hotspot regions, such as in the Auts2 and Wwox loci. The frequency and location of spontaneous and aphidicolin-induced CNV formation were not altered by loss of Xrcc4, as would be expected if canonical NHEJ were the predominant pathway of CNV formation. Moreover, de novo CNV junctions displayed a typical pattern of microhomology and blunt end use that did not change in the absence of Xrcc4. A number of complex CNVs were detected in both wild-type and Xrcc4 −/− cells, including an example of a catastrophic, chromothripsis event. These results establish that nonrecurrent CNVs can be, and frequently are, formed by mechanisms other than Xrcc4-dependent NHEJ.

Despite their importance to human genetic variation and disease, little is known about the molecular mechanisms and environmental risk factors that impact copy number variant (CNV) formation. While it is clear that replication stress can lead to de novo CNVs, for example following treatment of cultured mammalian cells with aphidicolin (APH) and hydroxyurea (HU), the effect of different types of mutagens on CNV induction is unknown. Here we report that ionizing radiation (IR) in the range of 1.5–3.0 Gy effectively induces de novo CNV mutations in cultured normal human fibroblasts. These IR-induced CNVs are found throughout the genome, with the same hotspot regions seen after APH- and HU-induced replication stress. IR produces duplications at a higher frequency relative to deletions than do APH and HU. At most hotspots, these duplications are physically shifted from the regions typically deleted after APH or HU, suggesting different pathways involved in their formation. CNV breakpoint junctions from irradiated samples are characterized by microhomology, blunt ends, and insertions like those seen in spontaneous and APH/HU-induced CNVs and most nonrecurrent CNVs in vivo. The similarity to APH/HU-induced CNVs suggests that low-dose IR induces CNVs through a replication-dependent mechanism, as opposed to replication-independent repair of DSBs. Consistent with this mechanism, a lower yield of CNVs was observed when cells were held for 48h before re-plating after irradiation. These results predict that any environmental DNA damaging agent that impairs replication is capable of creating CNVs.

No abstract