The article sets out to analyze the victimization and objectification of women and the assertion of female subjectivity in the agitprop theatres of Usha Ganguly and Maya Krishna Rao. The article focuses on Ganguly’s Ham Mukhtārā, an adaptation of Mukhtār Māī’s autobiography, In the Name of Honor: A Memoir, which registers protest against a patriarchal society that subjugates women, as well as Rao’s Walk, which challenges the dynamics of power and the societal ostracization of women. The article argues that in the wake of the Nirbhayā case and the ripples created in society by the protests, candlelit marches, and public performances, these recent feminist-propagandist plays are conceived as part of an ongoing pursuit on the part of both artists to resist the phallocentric objectification and reductive categorization of the female body and to reclaim the agency and subjectivity of women.
Draupadī, the wife of the five Pāṇḍavas in the Mahābhārata, is a much discussed character who has been interpreted in various ways, for example as a tragic character, the heroine of the epic, and even as a witch who is responsible for causing mass destruction, the Kurukṣetra war. With all the associated complexities, Draupadī remains one of the most intriguing of characters, a figure who has baffled readers and critics alike over the ages. The present study seeks to analyze the explications of one of the most haunting episodes of the Mahābhārata, the disrobing of Draupadī, as portrayed in contemporary folk art and theatre, which seek to demythologize one of the most controversial characters in the canon of Indian literature and deconstruct the Phallocentric ideology that informs the epic. The study takes into consideration Saoli Mitra’s play, Nāthavatī anāthavat (“Five Lords, Yet None a Protector”), which is an attempt to view Draupadī through “a pair of woman’s eyes,” together with Teejan Bai’s dramatized rendering of Draupadī cīrharaṇ. It seeks to draw comparisons with the original epic as well as between the works of these two theatre artists and their style of narration in order to evaluate how far they have succeeded in providing radically different interpretations of the character while providing the essential message of the episode. These two artists share some striking characteristics as they take up the rural folk tradition and enter the male bastion, using dramatized theatrical techniques, such as live music and dance to act out multiple roles, all the while recontextualizing the episodes, often offering a social critique, demythologizing the myth, and presenting the essential message of the epic that is expressed in mythical terms.
The article sets out to analyze the victimization and objectification of women and the assertion of female subjectivity in the agitprop theatres of Usha Ganguly and Maya Krishna Rao. The article focuses on Ganguly’s Ham Mukhtārā, an adaptation of Mukhtār Māī’s autobiography, In the Name of Honor: A Memoir, which registers protest against a patriarchal society that subjugates women, as well as Rao’s Walk, which challenges the dynamics of power and the societal ostracization of women. The article argues that in the wake of the Nirbhayā case and the ripples created in society by the protests, candlelit marches, and public performances, these recent feminist-propagandist plays are conceived as part of an ongoing pursuit on the part of both artists to resist the phallocentric objectification and reductive categorization of the female body and to reclaim the agency and subjectivity of women.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.