No abstract

All experts involved in the development of these guidelines have submitted declarations of interest. These have been compiled in a report and simultaneously published in a supplementary document to the guidelines. The report is also available on the ESC website www.escardio.org/Guidelines See the European Heart Journal online for supplementary data that include background information and detailed discussion of the data that have provided the basis of the guidelines.Click here to access the corresponding ESC CardioMed chapters.

Despite increased awareness, poor adherence to treatments for chronic diseases remains a global problem. Adherence issues are common in patients taking antihypertensive therapy and associated with increased risks of coronary and cerebrovascular events. Whilst there has been a gradual trend toward improved control of hypertension, the number of patients with blood pressure values above goal has remained constant. This has both personal and economic consequences. Medication adherence is a multifaceted issue and consists of three components: initiation, implementation, and persistence. A combination of methods is recommended to measure adherence, with electronic monitoring and drug measurement being the most accurate. Pill burden, resulting from free combinations of blood pressure lowering treatments, makes the daily routine of medication taking complex, which can be a barrier to optimal adherence. Single-pill fixed-dose combinations simplify the habit of medication taking and improve medication adherence. Re-packing of medication is also being utilized as a method of improving adherence. This paper presents the outcomes of discussions by a European group of experts on the current situation of medication adherence in hypertension.

Aim Current guidelines recommend the use of Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) for up to 3 – 6 months for treatment of LV thrombus post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, based on evidence supporting non-inferiority of Novel Oral Anti-Coagulant’s (NOAC) compared to VKA for other indications such as DVT, PE and thrombo-embolic prevention in atrial fibrillation, NOACs are being increasingly used off licence for the treatment of LV thrombus post AMI. In this study we investigated the safety and effect of NOACs compared to VKA on LV thrombus resolution in patients presenting with AMI. Methods and Results This was an observational study of 2,328 consecutive patients undergoing Coronary Angiography +/- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) for AMI between May 2015- December 2018, at a UK cardiac centre. Patients’ details were collected from the hospital electronic database. The primary end-point was rate of LV thrombus resolution with bleeding rates a secondary outcome. Left ventricular (LV) thrombus was diagnosed in 101 (4.3%) patients. Sixty patients (59.4%) were started on VKA and 41 patients (40.6%) on NOAC therapy (rivaroxaban: 58.5%, apixaban, 36.5% and edoxaban: 5.0%). Both groups were well matched in terms of baseline characteristics including age, previous cardiac history (Previous MI, PCI, CABG), and cardiovascular risk factors (Hypertension, Diabetes, Hypercholesterolaemia). Over the follow up period (median 2.2 years), overall rates of LV thrombus resolution were 86.1%. There was greater and earlier LV thrombus resolution in the NOAC group compared to patients treated with warfarin (82% vs 64.4%, p = 0.0018, at 1 year), which persisted after adjusting for baseline variables (OR 1.8 95% CI 1.2-2.9). Major bleeding events during the f/u period were lower in the NOAC group, compared with VKA group (0% vs 6.7%, p = 0.030) with no difference in rates of systemic thromboembolism (5% vs 2.4%, p = 0.388). Conclusion This data suggests improved thrombus resolution in post ACS LV thrombosis in patients treated with NOACs compared to vitamin K antagonists. This improvement in thrombus resolution was accompanied with a better safety profile for NOAC patients’ vs VKA treated patients. Thus, provides data to support a randomised trial to answer this question.

Approximately 10% of ischemic strokes are associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) first diagnosed at the time of stroke. Detecting asymptomatic AF would provide an opportunity to prevent these strokes by instituting appropriate anticoagulation. The AF-SCREEN international collaboration was formed in September 2015 to promote discussion and research about AF screening as a strategy to reduce stroke and death and to provide advocacy for implementation of country-specific AF screening programs. During 2016, 60 expert members of AF-SCREEN, including physicians, nurses, allied health professionals, health economists, and patient advocates, were invited to prepare sections of a draft document. In August 2016, 51 members met in Rome to discuss the draft document and consider the key points arising from it using a Delphi process. These key points emphasize that screen-detected AF found at a single timepoint or by intermittent ECG recordings over 2 weeks is not a benign condition and, with additional stroke factors, carries sufficient risk of stroke to justify consideration of anticoagulation. With regard to the methods of mass screening, handheld ECG devices have the advantage of providing a verifiable ECG trace that guidelines require for AF diagnosis and would therefore be preferred as screening tools. Certain patient groups, such as those with recent embolic stroke of uncertain source (ESUS), require more intensive monitoring for AF. Settings for screening include various venues in both the community and the clinic, but they must be linked to a pathway for appropriate diagnosis and management for screening to be effective. It is recognized that health resources vary widely between countries and health systems, so the setting for AF screening should be both country- and health system-specific. Based on current knowledge, this white paper provides a strong case for AF screening now while recognizing that large randomized outcomes studies would be helpful to strengthen the evidence base.