The metabolic tumour volume (MTV) is an independent prognostic indicator in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, its measurement is not standardised and is subject to wide variations depending on the method used. This study aimed to compare the reproducibility of MTV measurement as well as the thresholds obtained for each method and their prognostic values. The baseline MTV was measured in 239 consecutive patients treated at Henri Becquerel Centre by two blinded evaluators. Eight methods were compared: 3 absolute (SUV (standardised uptake value) ≥ 2.5; SUV≥ liver SUVmax; SUV≥ PERCIST SUV), 1 percentage SUV threshold method (SUV ≥ 41% SUVmax) and 4 adaptive methods (Daisne, Nestle, Fitting, Black). The intraclass correlation coefficients were excellent, from 0.91 to 0.96, for the absolute SUV methods, Black and Nestle methods, and good for 41% SUVmax, Fitting and Daisne methods (0.82 to 0.88), with a significantly lower variability with absolute methods compared to 41% SUVmax (p < 0.04). Thresholds were found to be specific to each segmentation method and ranged from 295 to 552 cm3. There was a strong correlation between the MTV and patient prognosis regardless of the segmentation method used (p = 0.001 for PFS and OS). The largest inter-observer cut-off variability was observed in the 41% SUVmax method, which resulted in more inter-observer disagreements in the classification of patients between high and low MTV groups. MTV measurements based on absolute SUV criteria were found to be significantly more reproducible than those based on 41% SUVmax criteria. The threshold was specific for each of eight segmentation methods, but all predicted prognosis.

Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic value of initial total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV) in a population of patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). We retrospectively included 179 patients with stage IIb-III-IV Hodgkin’s disease who received BEACOPP or ABVD as the first-line treatment. The initial TMTV was determined using a semi-automatic method for each patient. We analysed its prognostic value in terms of 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and positron emission tomography (PET) response after two courses of chemotherapy. Considering all the treatments and using a threshold of 217 cm3, TMTV was predictive of 5-year PFS and PET response after two courses of chemotherapy. In multivariable analysis involving TMTV, IPI score, and the first treatment received, TMTV remained a baseline prognostic factor for 5-year PFS. In the subgroup of patients treated with BEACOPP with a threshold of 331 cm3, TMTV was predictive of PET response, but not 5-year PFS (p = 0.087). The combined analysis of TMTV and PET response enabled the individualisation of a subgroup of patients (low TMTV and complete response on PET) with a very low risk of recurrence. Baseline TMTV appears to be a useful independent prognostic factor for predicting relapse in advanced-stage HL in ABVD subgroup, with a tendency of survival curves separation in BEACOPP subgroup.

No abstract

Highlights: Sarcopenia is frequent in patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) or radiochemotherapy (RTCT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Sarcopenia is associated with poor disease-free survival and overall survival outcomes. Sarcopenia is not associated with a higher rate of treatment-related toxicity. Background: Sarcopenia occurs frequently with the diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We aimed to assess the impact of sarcopenia on survival among HNSCC patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) or radiochemotherapy (RTCT). Methods: Patients treated between 2014 and 2018 by RT or RTCT with curative intent were prospectively included (NCT02900963). Optimal nutritional support follow-up, including weekly consultation with a dietician and an oncologist and daily weight monitoring, was performed. Sarcopenia was determined by measuring the skeletal muscles at the L3 vertebra on the planning CT scan for radiotherapy. For each treatment group (RT or RTCT), we assessed the prognostic value of sarcopenia for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and its impact on treatment-related toxicity. Results: Two hundred forty-three HNSCC patients were included: 116 were treated by RT and 127 were treated by RTCT. Before radiotherapy, eight (3.3%) patients were considered malnourished according to albumin, whereas 88 (36.7%) patients were sarcopenic. Overall, sarcopenia was associated with OS and DFS in a multivariate analysis (HR 1.9 [1.1–3.25] and 1.7 [1.06–2.71], respectively). It was similar for patients treated with RT (HR 2.49 [1.26–4.9] for DFS and 2.24 [1.03–4.86] for OS), whereas for patients treated with RTCT sarcopenia was significantly associated with OS and DFS in univariate analysis only. Sarcopenia was not related to higher treatment-related toxicity. Conclusions: Pretherapeutic sarcopenia remains frequent and predicts OS and DFS for non-frail patients treated with curative intent and adequate nutritional support.

We conducted a retrospective study to analyze the prognostic factors impacting the overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients undergoing first‐line therapy and admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) compared to a control cohort who did not required ICU admission. Between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2018, 828 patients were diagnosed with DLBCL at our institution, including 72 patients who were required ICU admission during disease course. Among them, forty‐five patients undergoing homogeneous first‐line therapy with /R‐CHOP‐like regimen and ICU‐admitted were selected for the present analysis. Control “non‐ICU” DLBCL patients were matched by age, IPI score and treatment received. The median age at ICU admission was 65 years, 97.8% of patients displayed advanced‐stage disease (III/IV), and 84.4% had a high IPI score (3‐5). The main reasons for ICU admission were acute respiratory failure (40.0%) and septic shock (33.3%). The ICU mortality rate was 33.3%. The 2‐year PFS was lower in ICU survivors patients than in non‐ICU patients: 31.7% (95% CI 18.5‐54.1) vs 60.8% (95% CI 51.2‐72.1, P = .00049). Admission to the ICU is an event that clearly impacts the outcomes of patients with DLBCL, until 2 years after the event. ICU prognosis seems mainly related to critical patient severity at admission rather than lymphoma‐related prognostic factors (IPIs), suggesting that ICU admission criteria should not be based only on the lymphoma prognosis.