The high-affinity interaction between urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its glycolipid-anchored receptor (uPAR) plays an important role in pericellular plasminogen activation. Since proteolytic degradation of the extracellular matrix has an established role in tumor invasion and metastasis, the uPA-uPAR interaction represents a potential target for therapeutic intervention. By affinity maturation using combinatorial chemistry we have now developed and characterized a 9-mer, linear peptide antagonist of the uPA-uPAR interaction demonstrating specific, high-affinity binding to human uPAR (K(d) approximately 0.4 nM). Studies by surface plasmon resonance reveal that the off-rate for this receptor-peptide complex is comparable to that measured for the natural protein ligand, uPA. The functional epitope on human uPAR for this antagonist has been delineated by site-directed mutagenesis, and its assignment to loop 3 of uPAR domain III (Met(246), His(249), His(251), and Phe(256)) corroborates data previously obtained by photoaffinity labeling and provides a molecular explanation for the extreme selectivity observed for the antagonist toward human compared to mouse, monkey, and hamster uPAR. When human HEp-3 cancer cells were inoculated in the presence of this peptide antagonist, a specific inhibition of cancer cell intravasation was observed in a chicken chorioallantoic membrane assay. These data imply that design of small organic molecules mimicking the binding determinants of this 9-mer peptide antagonist may have a potential application in combination therapy for certain types of cancer.

The neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) plays a key role in neural development, regeneration, and learning. In this study, we identified a synthetic peptide-ligand of the NCAM Ig1 module by combinatorial chemistry and showed it could modulate NCAM-mediated cell adhesion and signal transduction with high potency. In cultures of dissociated neurons, this peptide, termed C3, stimulated neurite outgrowth by activating a signaling pathway identical to that activated by homophilic NCAM binding. A similar effect was shown for the NCAM Ig2 module, the endogenous ligand of NCAM Ig1. By nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, the C3 binding site in the NCAM Ig1 module was mapped and shown to be different from the binding site of the NCAM Ig2 module. The C3 peptide may prove useful as a lead in development of therapies for neurodegenerative disorders, and the C3 binding site of NCAM Ig1 may represent a target for discovery of nonpeptide drugs.

Binding of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to its cellular receptor (uPAR) renders the cell surface a favored site for plasminogen activation. Recently, a 15-mer peptide antagonist of the uPA-uPAR interaction, with an IC50 value of 10 nM, was identified using phage display technology [Goodson, R. J., Doyle, M. V., Kaufman, S. E., and Rosenberg, S. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91, 7129-7133]. In the present study, the molecular aspects of the interaction between this peptide and uPAR have been investigated. We have characterized the real-time receptor binding kinetics for the antagonist using surface plasmon resonance and identified critical residues by alanine replacements. The minimal peptide antagonist thus derived (SLNFSQYLWS) was rendered photoactivatable by replacing residues important for uPAR binding with photochemically active derivatives of phenylalanine containing either (trifluoromethyl)diazirine or benzophenone. These peptides incorporated covalently into purified soluble uPAR upon photoactivation, and this was inhibited by preincubation with receptor binding derivatives of uPA. The intact three-domain structure of uPAR was essential for efficient photoaffinity labeling. Proteolytic domain mapping using chymotrypsin revealed a specific labeling of both uPAR domain I and domains II + III dependent on the position of the photoprobe in the antagonist. On the basis of these studies, we propose the existence of a composite ligand binding site in uPAR combined of residues located in distinct structural domains. According to this model, a close spatial proximity between uPAR domain I and either domains II or III in intact uPAR is required for the assembly of this composite binding site. Since the receptor binding properties of the peptide antagonist closely mimic those of uPA itself, these two ligands presumably share coincident binding site in uPAR.

Insulin is thought to elicit its effects by crosslinking the two extracellular ␣-subunits of its receptor, thereby inducing a conformational change in the receptor, which activates the intracellular tyrosine kinase signaling cascade. Previously we identified a series of peptides binding to two discrete hotspots on the insulin receptor. Here we show that covalent linkage of such peptides into homodimers or heterodimers results in insulin agonists or antagonists, depending on how the peptides are linked. An optimized agonist has been shown, both in vitro and in vivo, to have a potency close to that of insulin itself. The ability to construct such peptide derivatives may offer a path for developing agonists or antagonists for treatment of a wide variety of diseases.I nsulin is one of the most studied peptide hormones because of its importance in maintaining glucose homeostasis. This 51-aa hormone is very well characterized with regard to its structure, both in crystal form and in solution. The insulin receptor (IR) is a transmembrane ␣ 2 ␤ 2 glycoprotein whose intracellular tyrosine kinase domain is activated by binding of insulin, leading to a cascade of intracellular signaling events. The kinase domain of the IR (1) and an extracellular fragment of the related receptor for insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-IR; ref. 2) have been crystallized, but the structure of the insulin binding domain of the IR is not known, and the mechanism for the transmission of a signal through its transmembrane domain is not well understood. A model for the binding and activation has been proposed in which insulin uses two different sites on its surface to crosslink the two ␣-subunits of the IR, thus inducing a conformational change that activates the receptor (refs. 3 and 4; Fig. 1).In a previous report (5), we panned random, highly diverse peptide display libraries against the IR. By using this approach, we identified a large number of peptides binding to the IR and competing for insulin binding with micromolar or submicromolar affinity, although these peptides had no sequence homology with insulin. These peptides bound to two discrete hotspots on the receptor (designated site 1 and site 2), and these hotspots appeared to correspond to the two contact sites involved in insulin binding predicted by the crosslinking model (ref. 3 and J.B., unpublished results). At least two different sequence motifs were found for site 1 peptides, and some of these were full agonists but of low affinity. Other site 1 peptides were antagonists, whereas site 2 peptides were either antagonists or inactive. The mechanism behind the agonism of the site 1 peptides is not known, but it has been speculated that site 1 binding may be important for receptor activation, whereas the role of the site 2 interaction may be more related to affinity and selectivity. In addition to these two families of peptides, a third group was identified, but no further work has been done on this group. In the present work, we have used site 1 and site 2 peptides as building blocks ...