Background: Patients undergoing major surgery are at risk of complications, so-called serious adverse events (SAE). Continuous monitoring may detect deteriorating patients by recording abnormal vital signs. We aimed to assess the association between abnormal vital signs inspired by Early Warning Score thresholds and subsequent SAEs in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.Methods: Prospective observational cohort study continuously monitoring heart rate, respiratory rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, and blood pressure for up to 96 h in 500 postoperative patients admitted to the general ward. Exposure variables were vital sign abnormalities, primary outcome was any serious adverse event occurring within 30 postoperative days. The primary analysis investigated the association between exposure variables per 24 h and subsequent serious adverse events.Results: Serious adverse events occurred in 37% of patients, with 38% occurring during monitoring. Among patients with SAE during monitoring, the median duration of vital sign abnormalities was 272 min (IQR 110-447), compared to 259 min (IQR 153-394) in patients with SAE after monitoring and 261 min (IQR 132-468) in the patients without any SAE (p = .62 for all three group comparisons). Episodes of heart rate ≥110 bpm occurred in 16%, 7.1%, and 3.9% of patients in the time before SAE during monitoring, after monitoring, and without SAE, respectively (p < .002). Patients withThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

No abstract

Objective. Wireless sensors for continuous monitoring of vital signs have potential to improve patient care by earlier detection of deterioration in general ward patients. We aimed to assess agreement between wireless and standard (wired) monitoring devices in patients hospitalized with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Approach. Paired measurements of vital signs were recorded with 15 min intervals for two hours. The primary outcome was agreement between wireless and standard monitor measurements using the Bland and Altman method to calculate bias with 95% limits of agreement (LoA). We considered LoA of less than ±5 beats min−1 (bpm) acceptable for heart rate (HR), whereas agreement of peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), and blood pressure (BP) were acceptable if within ±3%-points, ±3 breaths min−1 (brpm), and ±10 mmHg, respectively. Main results. 180 sample-pairs of vital signs from 20 with AECOPD patients were recorded for comparison. The wireless versus standard monitor bias was 0.03 (LoA −3.2 to 3.3) bpm for HR measurements, 1.4% (LoA −0.7% to 3.6%) for SpO2, −7.8 (LoA −22.3 to 6.8) mmHg for systolic BP and −6.2 (LoA −16.8 to 4.5) mmHg for diastolic BP. The wireless versus standard monitor bias for RR measurements was 0.75 (LoA −6.1 to 7.6) brpm. Significance. Commercially available wireless monitors could accurately measure HR in patients admitted with AECOPD compared to standard wired monitoring. Agreement for SpO2 were borderline acceptable while agreement for RR and BP should be interpreted with caution.

BACKGROUND: New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is associated with several cardiovascular complications and higher mortality. Several pathophysiological processes such as hypoxia can trigger POAF, but these are sparsely elucidated, and POAF is often asymptomatic. In patients undergoing major gastrointestinal cancer surgery, we aimed to describe the frequency of POAF as automatically estimated and detected via wireless repeated sampling monitoring and secondarily to describe the association between preceding vital sign deviations and POAF. METHOD: Patients ≥60 years of age undergoing major gastrointestinal cancer surgery were continuously monitored for up to 4 days postoperatively. Electrocardiograms were obtained every minute throughout the monitoring period. Clinical staff were blinded to all measurements. As for the primary outcome, POAF was defined as 30 consecutive minutes or more detected by a purpose-built computerized algorithm and validated by cardiologists. The primary exposure variable was any episode of peripheral oxygen saturation (Spo 2 ) <85% for >5 consecutive minutes before POAF. RESULTS: A total of 30,145 hours of monitoring was performed in 398 patients, with a median of 92 hours per patient (interquartile range [IQR], 54-96). POAF was detected in 26 patients (6.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5-9.4) compared with 14 (3.5%; 95% CI, 1.94-5.83) discovered by clinical staff in the monitoring period. POAF was followed by 9.4 days hospitalization (IQR, 6.5-16) versus 6.5 days (IQR, 2.5-11) in patients without POAF. Preceding episodes of Spo 2 <85% for >5 minutes (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.24-4.00; P = .98) or other vital sign deviations were not significantly associated with POAF. CONCLUSIONS: New-onset POAF occurred in 6.5% (95% CI, 4.5-9.4) of patients after major gastrointestinal cancer surgery, and 1 in 3 cases was not detected by the clinical staff (35%; 95% CI, 17-56). POAF was not preceded by vital sign deviations. (Anesth Analg 2022;135:100-9) KEY POINTS• Questions: Can new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after major abdominal surgery be detected in the surgical wards by continuous wearable monitoring, and is POAF preceded by deviating vital signs? • Findings: A high detection rate of POAF (6.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5-9.4) was found using wireless monitoring with repeated sampling, and no significant associations were found between POAF and preceding deviating vital signs. • Meaning: Wireless repeated sampling monitoring can detect POAF outside routine monitoring in surgical wards, and these events do not seem to be preceded by vital sign derangement.

No abstract