Due to frequent and often severe lung affections caused by COVID-19, murine models of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are increasingly used in experimental lung research. The one induced by a single lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exposure is practical. However, whether it is preferable to administer LPS intranasally or intratracheally remains an open question. Herein, female C57Bl/6 J mice were exposed intranasally or intratracheally to one dose of either saline or 3 mg/kg of LPS. They were studied 24 h later. The groups treated with LPS, either intranasally or intratracheally, exhibited a pronounced neutrophilic inflammation, signs of lung tissue damage and protein extravasation into the alveoli, and mild lung dysfunction. The magnitude of the response was generally not different between groups exposed intranasally versus intratracheally. However, the variability of some the responses was smaller in the LPS-treated groups exposed intranasally versus intratracheally. Notably, the saline-treated mice exposed intratracheally demonstrated a mild neutrophilic inflammation and alterations of the airway epithelium. We conclude that an intranasal exposure is as effective as an intratracheal exposure in a murine model of ARDS induced by LPS. Additionally, the groups exposed intranasally demonstrated less variability in the responses to LPS and less complications associated with the sham procedure.
There are renewed interests in using the parameter K of Salazar-Knowles' equation to assess lung tissue compliance. K either decreases or increases when the lung's parenchyma stiffens or loosens, respectively. However, whether K is affected by other common features of respiratory diseases, such as inflammation and airway smooth muscle (ASM) contraction, is unknown. Herein, male C57BL/6 mice were treated intranasally with either saline or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) at 1 mg/Kg to induce pulmonary inflammation. They were then subjected to either a multiple or a single-dose challenge with methacholine to activate ASM to different degrees. A quasi-static pressure-driven partial pressure-volume maneuver was performed before and after methacholine. The Salazar-Knowles' equation was then fitted to the deflation limb of the P-V loop to obtain K, as well as the parameter A, an estimate of lung volume (inspiratory capacity). The fitted curve was also used to derive the quasi-static elastance (Est) at 5 cmH2O. The results demonstrate that LPS and both methacholine challenges increased Est. LPS also decreased A, but did not affect K. In contradistinction, methacholine decreased both A and K in the multiple-dose challenge, while it decreased K but not A in the single-dose challenge. These results suggest that LPS increases Est by reducing the open lung volume (A) and without affecting tissue compliance (K), while methacholine increases Est by decreasing tissue compliance with or without affecting lung volume. We conclude that lung tissue compliance, assessed using the parameter K of Salazar-Knowles' equation, is insensitive to inflammation but sensitive to ASM contraction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.