No abstract

Cerebral Cavernous Malformations (CCM/MIM 604214) are vascular malformations characterised by abnormally enlarged capillary cavities without intervening brain parenchyma. Clinical manifestations include seizures, cerebral haemorrhages and focal neurological deficits. They occur as a sporadic or autosomal dominant condition. Most often, sporadic cases have only one lesion and familial cases are characterised by a high frequency of multiple lesions. Three CCM loci were previously mapped on 7q (CCM1), 7p (CCM2) and 3q (CCM3) and CCM1 gene was identified as coding Krit1, a protein of unknown function, which was shown initially to interact in yeast two hybrid assays with Rap1A, a small ras GTPase and more recently to Icap1a, a modulator of b1 integrin signal transduction. Herein, we screened KRIT1 gene in 121 unrelated, consecutively recruited, CCM probands having at least one affected relative and/ or showing multiple lesions on cerebral MRI. Fifty-two of these probands (43%) were shown to carry a KRIT1 mutation. Forty-two distinct mutations were identified including six recurrent ones. Three-quarters of these mutations were located in the C-terminal half of the gene, mostly within exons 13, 15 and 17. All of them are predicted to lead to a premature stop codon. No missense mutation was identified. The only two nucleotide substitutions predicted to be missense mutations led in fact to an abnormal splicing and a premature stop codon. Altogether these data suggest that KRIT1 mRNA decay due to the presence of premature stop codons and Krit1 haploinsufficiency may be the underlying mechanism of CCM.

Cavernous angiomas are vascular malformations mostly located in the central nervous system and characterized by enlarged capillary cavities without intervening brain parenchyma. Clinical symptoms include seizures, haemorrhage and focal neurological deficits. Cavernous angiomas prevalence is close to 0.5% in the general population. They may be inherited as an autosomal dominant condition in as much as 50% of cases. Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM) loci were previously identified on 7q, 7p and 3q (refs 4,5). A strong founder effect was observed in the Hispano-American population, all families being linked to CCM1 on 7q (refs 4,7). CCM1 locus assignment was refined to a 4-cM interval bracketed by D7S2410 and D7S689 (ref. 8). Here we report a physical and transcriptional map of this interval and that CCM1, a gene whose protein product, KRIT1, interacts with RAP1A (also known as KREV1; ref. 9), a member of the RAS family of GTPases, is mutated in CCM1 families. Our data suggest the involvement of the RAP1A signal transduction pathway in vasculogenesis or angiogenesis.

The familial form of cavernous angioma is characterized by multiple lesions and by a correlation between lesion number and subject age. The clinical manifestation may be more closely related to the type of lesion than to the number of lesions. GRE MR images are more sensitive than SE images for demonstration of cavernous angioma.

Leptomeningeal meningitis occurs in approximately 5% of metastatic breast cancers, and there is no standard treatment for this complication. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and cerebrospinal fluid of 24 patients treated with high-dose intrathecal methotrexate for breast cancer leptomeningeal meningitis (BLM). Cytologic response (CSF cytology without neoplastic cells after treatment) was observed in 11 patients (46%) and related to survival (P = 0.005). In addition, clinical symptoms improved in all 11 patients who had a cytologic response and in 7 patients (54%) without cytologic response (P = 0.02). The predictive value of cytologic response needs further confirmation. Cytologic response could be helpful in the management of intrathecal chemotherapy in patients with BLM.

No abstract

No abstract

CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) has been reported to be involved in organ-specific homing of breast cancer-derived metastasis. We investigated CXCR4 expression by immunohistochemistry as a possible new prognostic factor for primary breast cancer. Two groups of women treated for breast cancer in 1991 at the Centre for the fight against cancer of Upper Normandy-France (Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer de Haute Normandie) were assessed retrospectively. CXCR4 expression was evaluated using standard immunohistochemistry. Usual prognostic factors were recorded in the computer database. Final date of follow-up was December 31, 2001. Tissues were available for 110 node-positive and 84 node-negative breast cancer patients treated in 1991. CXCR4 membrane staining was considered a strong prognostic factor for both 10-year metastasis-free- (p < 0.0001) and overall survival (p < 0.0001) in node-negative but not in node-positive breast cancer patients. CXCR4 cytoplasmic staining was not considered a significant prognostic factor. Our results suggest that CXCR4 membrane staining could be considered a new prognostic factor. Moreover, targeting CXCR4 in primary breast cancer patients may be a new therapeutic concept. However, these results warrant further investigation.