Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Validated questionnaires revealed a shift of attention from chronic pain towards the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with chronic painful polyneuropathy.
Background The serotonin receptor 2A (HTR2A) has been described as an important facilitation mediator of spinal nociceptive processing leading to central sensitization (CS) in animal models of chronic pain. However, whether HTR2A single nucleotide variants (SNVs) modulate neuropathic pain states in patients has not been investigated so far. The aim of this study was to elucidate the potential association of HTR2A variants with sensory abnormalities or ongoing pain in neuropathic pain patients. Methods At total of 240 neuropathic pain patients and 253 healthy volunteers were included. Patients were phenotypically characterized using standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST). Patients and controls were genotyped for HTR2A g.‐1438G > A (rs6311) and c.102C > T (rs6313). Genotype‐related differences in QST parameters were assessed considering QST profile clusters, principal somatosensory components and sex. Results There was an equal distribution of rs6313 and linked rs6311 between patients and controls. However, the rs6313 variant was significantly associated with a principal component of pinprick hyperalgesia and dynamic mechanical allodynia, indicating enhanced CS in patients with sensory loss (−0.34 ± 0.15 vs. +0.31 ± 0.11 vs., p < .001). In this cluster, the variant allele was also associated with single QST parameters of pinprick hyperalgesia (MPT, +0.64 ± 0.18 vs. −0.34 ± 0.23 p = .002; MPS, +0.66 ± 0.17 vs. −0.09 ± 0.23, p = .009) and ongoing pain was increased by 30%. Conclusions The specific association of the rs6313 variant with pinprick hyperalgesia and increased levels of ongoing pain suggests that the HTR2A receptor might be an important modulator in the development of CS in neuropathic pain. Significance This article presents new insights into serotonin receptor 2A‐mediating mechanisms of central sensitization in neuropathic pain patients. The rs6313 variant allele was associated with increased mechanical pinprick sensitivity and increased levels of ongoing pain supporting a contribution of central sensitization in the genesis of ongoing pain providing a possible route for mechanism‐based therapies.
Background and Objectives Reduced laser‐evoked potential (LEP) habituation indicates abnormal central pain processing. But the paradigm (four stimulation blocks a 25 stimuli) is time consuming and potentially omits important information on the exact habituation time course. This study examined whether a high temporal resolution (HTR) analysis (dividing the four stimulation blocks into 12 analysis blocks) can answer the following questions: (a) After how many stimuli does LEP habituation occur? (b) Is there a difference in LEP habituation in younger versus older subjects? (c) Is HTR applicable on radiculopathy patients? Methods EEG data of 129 subjects were included. Thirty‐four young healthy and 28 advanced‐aged healthy subjects were tested with LEPs on the hand dorsum. Thirty‐seven radiculopathy patients and 30 controls were tested with LEPs on the L3 dermatome. The EEG data of the hand dorsa have been analysed conventionally and with HTR analysis. The applicability of HTR has been tested on radiculopathy patients and respective controls. Results HTR was well feasible in young healthy subjects and revealed a strong habituation effect during the first 25 stimuli (i.e. within the first 5 min). After approximately 48 stimuli, no further significant habituation was detectable. LEP amplitudes were higher in young subjects. HTR was unsuitable for elderly subjects and middle‐aged radiculopathy patients. Conclusions In young healthy subjects, HTR allows a shortening of the test protocol while providing a detailed information on the time course of LEP habituation. A shorter protocol might be useful for the applicability of the LEP paradigm for clinical and experimental settings as well as pharmacological studies. Significance The usage of high temporal resolution (HTR) analysis in young healthy subjects enables a short test protocol and provides the exact time course of laser‐evoked potential habituation. This can be useful for the examination of neurological conditions affecting younger patients and for pharmacological studies. HTR was inapplicable in advanced‐aged subjects and patients with radiculopathy.
Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Die Therapie der Polyneuropathie beinhaltet die symptomatische Behandlung sensibler, motorischer und autonomer Funktionsstörungen. Ziel Der Beitrag soll einen Überblick über aktuelle Therapieempfehlungen bei Polyneuropathie geben. Der Fokus liegt dabei auf der Schmerztherapie. Material und Methoden Basierend auf einer Literaturrecherche werden die aktuellen Empfehlungen zur Therapie diskutiert. Ergebnisse Mittel der ersten Wahl zur Therapie von Schmerzen bei Polyneuropathie sind die an Kalziumkanälen ansetzenden Antikonvulsiva Gabapentin und Pregabalin sowie die Antidepressiva Amitriptylin und Duloxetin. Alternativ können bei lokalisierten Beschwerden topische Therapeutika eingesetzt werden. In Einzelfällen kann der Einsatz von Opioiden sowie anderen Antidepressiva und Antikonvulsiva erwogen werden. Limitiert wird die Therapie im Allgemeinen durch Nebenwirkungen vor allem zentralnervöser Art. Schlussfolgerung Generell sollte die Therapie multimodal erfolgen und die Behandlung weiterer Beschwerden umfassen. Bei der Auswahl der Schmerzmedikation sollten Komorbiditäten, Patientenalter und Nebenwirkungen berücksichtigt werden. Eine Stratifizierung der Patienten anhand des Phänotyps könnte dabei helfen, das bestmögliche Therapieansprechen zu erzielen.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.