Context: Adequate postoperative management of nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFMAs) remains a challenge for the clinician. Objective: To identify predictive factors of NFMA relapse after initial surgery. Patients and methods: This retrospective study included 142 patients operated for an NFMA in two academic centers (CHU Bicêtre in France and UCL St Luc in Belgium). The rate of tumor relapse, defined as recurrence after total surgical resection or regrowth of a surgical remnant, as well as predictive factors was analyzed. Results: During a mean follow-up of 6.9 years, 10 out of 42 patients (24%) who had complete macroscopic resection of their tumor had recurrence, and 47 out of 100 patients (47%) with a surgical remnant experienced regrowth. The overall relapse rates were 25, 43, and 61% at 5, 10, and 15 years respectively. Invasion of the cavernous sinus, absence of immediate radiotherapy after the first neurosurgery, and immunohistochemical features of the tumor (mainly positive immunostaining for several hormones or for hormones other than gonadotropins) were independent risk factors for tumor relapse. Incomplete excision was only associated with relapse when invasion was withdrawn from the analysis, suggesting that these two factors are closely linked. Conclusion: NFMAs frequently recur/regrow after initial surgery, particularly when tumor is invasive, precluding complete removal. Immunohistochemical features such as positive immunostaining for several hormones or for hormones other than gonadotropins could help to predict undesirable outcomes.
Purpose: To assess the clinical efficacy of endovascular angiosome-oriented wound-targeted revascularization (WTR) vs indirect (wound-indifferent) revascularization (IR) in diabetic patients with neuroischemic foot ulcers. Materials and Methods: Between April 2009 and July 2017, 167 diabetic patients (mean age 72.8 years; 137 men) with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (Rutherford category 5) and foot wounds (Wagner 2–4) in 194 limbs were prospectively registered and scheduled for primary infragenicular endovascular treatment. Specific angiosome source artery reperfusion sustained by patent foot arches or arterial-arterial connections was attempted initially. If this approach failed, topographic revascularization via available collaterals (WTRc) and IR were sequentially attempted. Results: Reperfusion was successful in 176 (91%) of 194 limbs (113 with WTR, 28 with WTRc, and 35 with IR); the global angiosome-oriented technical success (WTR and WTRc) was 73% (141/194). The mean follow-up was 10.9±0.7 months (range 3–12.5). Over 1 year, 102 (58%) of the 176 successfully treated limbs experienced wound healing [79/113 (70%) in the WTR group, 15/28 (54%) in the WTRc group, and 7/35 (20%) in the IR group; p=0.011]. The mean time to healing was 6.8±0.4 months in the WTR group, 7.9±0.6 months in the WTRc group, and 9.8±0.7 months in the IR group (p=0.001). Relapses were noted in 18 (16%) WTR limbs, 5 (18%) WTRc limbs, and 6 (17%) IR limbs. Comparison between WTR and IR and WTRc vs IR showed improved cicatrization in the angiosome-oriented groups (p<0.05). Major adverse limb events (MALE) and limb salvage were different between WTR and WTRc and between WTR and IR groups (p<0.05), while WTRc vs IR was not. Amputation-free survival was not influenced by the revascularization strategy (p=0.093). Conclusion: Wound healing in diabetic patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia appeared to be improved by intentional wound-targeted revascularization, but no uniform benefit concerning MALE or limb preservation was observed. IR still represents an alternative for limb salvage in cases in which angiosome-guided revascularization fails.
D.G. has received consulting fees from the University of New Mexico for projects related to diabetes in the Navajo.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.