Background Elevated proinflammatory cytokines are associated with greater COVID-19 severity. We aimed to assess safety and efficacy of sarilumab, an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor, in patients with severe (requiring supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula or face mask) or critical (requiring greater supplemental oxygen, mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal support) COVID-19. Methods We did a 60-day, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational phase 3 trial at 45 hospitals in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Russia, and Spain. We included adults (≥18 years) admitted to hospital with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and pneumonia, who required oxygen supplementation or intensive care. Patients were randomly assigned (2:2:1 with permuted blocks of five) to receive intravenous sarilumab 400 mg, sarilumab 200 mg, or placebo. Patients, care providers, outcome assessors, and investigators remained masked to assigned intervention throughout the course of the study. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement of two or more points (seven point scale ranging from 1 [death] to 7 [discharged from hospital]) in the modified intention-to-treat population. The key secondary endpoint was proportion of patients alive at day 29. Safety outcomes included adverse events and laboratory assessments. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04327388 ; EudraCT, 2020-001162-12; and WHO, U1111-1249-6021. Findings Between March 28 and July 3, 2020, of 431 patients who were screened, 420 patients were randomly assigned and 416 received placebo (n=84 [20%]), sarilumab 200 mg (n=159 [38%]), or sarilumab 400 mg (n=173 [42%]). At day 29, no significant differences were seen in median time to an improvement of two or more points between placebo (12·0 days [95% CI 9·0 to 15·0]) and sarilumab 200 mg (10·0 days [9·0 to 12·0]; hazard ratio [HR] 1·03 [95% CI 0·75 to 1·40]; log-rank p=0·96) or sarilumab 400 mg (10·0 days [9·0 to 13·0]; HR 1·14 [95% CI 0·84 to 1·54]; log-rank p=0·34), or in proportions of patients alive (77 [92%] of 84 patients in the placebo group; 143 [90%] of 159 patients in the sarilumab 200 mg group; difference −1·7 [−9·3 to 5·8]; p=0·63 vs placebo; and 159 [92%] of 173 patients in the sarilumab 400 mg group; difference 0·2 [−6·9 to 7·4]; p=0·85 vs placebo). At day 29, there were numerical, non-significant survival differences between sarilumab 400 mg (88%) and placebo (79%; difference +8·9% [95% CI −7·7 to 25·5]; p=0·25) for patients who had critical disease. No unexpected safety signals were seen. The rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were 65% (55 of 84) in the placebo group, 65% (103 of 159) in the sarilumab 200 mg group, and 70% (121 of 173) in the sarilumab 400 mg group, and of those leading to death 11% (nine of 84) were in the placebo group, 1...

LTNP, elite LTNP, HIV controller, and elite controller patients are rare phenotypes. Elite LTNP patients are less frequent than HIV controllers. There is little overlap among the four subgroups of patients.

Among HIV-infected patients who initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART), patterns of cause-specific death varied by ART duration and were strongly related to age, sex, and transmission risk group. Deaths from non-AIDS malignancies were much more frequent than those from cardiovascular disease.

No abstract

Tuberculosis (TB)-associated immune restoration syndrome (IRS) is a frequent event (10 to 30%) in HIV-1-infected patients receiving antiretroviral treatment and is associated with an increased number of IFN-γ-producing tuberculin-specific cells. To further understand the immune mechanisms of TB-IRS and to identify predictive factors, we prospectively analyzed the Th1 and TCRγδ T cells known to be involved in mycobacterial defenses and dendritic cells at baseline and after antiretroviral and TB treatment in 24 HIV-1+ patients, 11 with and 13 without IRS. At baseline, these two groups differed by significantly lower proportions of TCRγδ and Vδ2+ T cells displaying the inhibitory receptors CD94/NKG2 and CD158ah,b in IRS patients. The two groups did not differ in the baseline characteristics of CD8 or CD4 T cells or TLR-2 expression on monocytes or myeloid/plasmacytoid dendritic cells. During IRS, the increase in tuberculin-specific IFN-γ-producing cells involved only highly activated effector memory multifunctional (IFN-γ+TNF-α+IL-2−) CD4 T cells, whereas activated HLA-DR+ CD4+ T cells also increased during IRS. In contrast, dendritic cells decreased significantly during IRS and there were no changes in TLR-2 expression. Finally, the Vδ2+ T cells, mostly killer Ig-related receptor (KIR) (CD94/NKG2− and CD158−), significantly peaked during IRS but not in non-IRS patients. In conclusion, IRS is associated with an increase in the number of activated tuberculin-specific effector memory CD4 T cells and of KIR−Vδ2+ TCRγδ+ T cells. Higher proportions of Vδ2+TCRγδ+ T cells lacking KIR expression are present as baseline and distinguish patients who will develop IRS from those who will not.

The incidence of ADIs was higher in individuals with a current CD4 count of 500-749 cells/µL compared to those with a CD4 count of 750-999 cells/µL, but did not decrease further at higher CD4 counts. Results were similar in patients virologically suppressed on combination antiretroviral therapy, suggesting that immune reconstitution is not complete until the CD4 increases to >750 cells/µL.

Effect estimates from randomized trials and observational studies might not be directly comparable because of differences in study design, other than randomization, and in data analysis. We propose a 3-step procedure to facilitate meaningful comparisons of effect estimates from randomized trials and observational studies: 1) harmonization of the study protocols (eligibility criteria, treatment strategies, outcome, start and end of follow-up, causal contrast) so that the studies target the same causal effect, 2) harmonization of the data analysis to estimate the causal effect, and 3) sensitivity analyses to investigate the impact of discrepancies that could not be accounted for in the harmonization process. To illustrate our approach, we compared estimates of the effect of immediate with deferred initiation of antiretroviral therapy in individuals positive for the human immunodeficiency virus from the Strategic Timing of Antiretroviral Therapy (START) randomized trial and the observational HIV-CAUSAL Collaboration.

The occurrence of toxoplasmic encephalitis (TE) was studied among 19,598 and 17,016 patients enrolled in the French Hospital Database on human immunodeficiency virus whose CD4 cell counts decreased to < or =200x10(6) cells/L before (1992-1995) or after (1996-1998) the availability of highly active antiretroviral therapy, respectively. The incidence of TE decreased from 3.9 cases per 100 person-years in the first period (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7-4.1) to 1.0 cases per 100 person-years in the second period (95% CI, 0.9-1.1). After adjustment for known risk factors for TE, patients who received cotrimoxazole prophylaxis had a lower risk of TE (adjusted relative hazard, 0.6 and 0.5, respectively, for the first and second periods; P < .001). For patients treated with cotrimoxazole at inclusion, discontinuation of cotrimoxazole increased the risk of TE in both periods (adjusted relative hazard, 4.8 and 4.2, respectively; P < .001). Among patients whose CD4 cell counts increased to > 200 x 10(6) cells/L while undergoing highly active antiretroviral therapy, the incidence of TE was 0.1 cases per 100 person-years (95% CI, 0.0-0.2) and was not increased by discontinuation of cotrimoxazole.