Androgens enhance nNOS gene expression in the penile corpus cavernosum of rats, suggesting that they play an important role in maintaining NOS activity. Of the two androgens, DHT was more potent.

No abstract

Introduction Sildenafil citrate 50 mg is the recommended starting dose for men with erectile dysfunction (ED); however, most men are later titrated to sildenafil 100 mg for improved efficacy. Aim Assess the tolerability and efficacy of sildenafil initiated at the 100-mg dose in men with ED. Methods Men with ED (score ≤25 on the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function) who had received ≤6 total doses of a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor and none within 4 weeks were randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind, placebo-controlled (DBPC), fixed-dose treatment (50 or 100 mg sildenafil or placebo) followed by 4 weeks of open-label flexible-dose sildenafil (50 or 100 mg). Main Outcome Measures Efficacy, tolerability, treatment satisfaction, and other end points were measured at baseline and/or the end of the double-blind and open-label phases and compared between placebo and sildenafil initiated at doses of 50 and 100 mg. Results Improvements in DBPC patient-reported outcomes from baseline were statistically significant for both sildenafil 50 and 100 mg compared with placebo. At the end of DBPC treatment, 56% of men on the 100-mg dose felt no anxiety about the next intercourse attempt compared with 39% in the 50-mg group (odds ratio 2.03; P = 0.0197). Changes in functional scores from baseline were not statistically significant with the 100-mg dose compared with the 50-mg dose in the DBPC. Measures of treatment satisfaction and sexual experience significantly favored the 100-mg dose compared with the 50-mg dose in the DBPC. There was no increase in adverse events with the higher dose. Conclusions Sildenafil at 50 mg or 100 mg significantly improved erection quality, treatment satisfaction, anxiety levels, and the sexual experience compared with placebo during DBPC. Sildenafil 100 mg improved the sexual experience and treatment satisfaction, and reduced feelings of anxiety compared with the 50-mg dose.

Urinary incontinence and enuresis are well-known side effects of clozapine. However, clinical experience has shown that patients also suffer from diverse lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The natural course of clozapine-related LUTS is unclear. Thus, a longitudinal follow-up study is needed. A total of 101 subjects who were taking clozapine initially participated. Their LUTS were evaluated using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), other questionnaires, and a medical records review. After 2 years, 87 of the original subjects could be contacted, and the status of their LUTS was re-evaluated. The average IPSS total was 7.4 +/- 5.9 at the initial evaluation. Although only 11 subjects (10.9%) reported actual incontinence, 42 subjects (41.6%) were found to have clinically significant LUTS (IPSS total score > or =8). No influencing factors could be found among the demographic and clinical variables. At the follow-up, the average IPSS total (7.9 +/- 6.0) and the percentage of subjects with clinically significant LUTS (43.7%) had both increased, although the change was not statistically significant. The prevalence of LUTS in clozapine-medicated patients was higher than in the general population of the same age. However, the prevalence of incontinence was only a quarter of that of LUTS. If clinicians focus only on incontinence, distress from LUTS will not receive appropriate attention. Furthermore, contrary to literature observations, clozapine-related LUTS did not remit easily but rather persisted even into the long-term maintenance phase. More concern should be directed at these troublesome and often neglected side effects.

No abstract