Background: To compare the efficacy of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) treatment for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) Methods: Two authors independently searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochran Library, and Web of Science to identify and review articles published from January 1998 until December 2018 according to selection criteria. Outcomes were expressed as mean difference, the pooled odds ratio, or relative risk in a meta-analysis model. Results: A total of 10 studies were included in this meta-analysis: 6 randomized-controlled studies and 4 observational studies. Meta-analysis showed that CIPN was improved after treatment with SNRI (standardized mean difference = 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.90–3.49; I 2 = 93% in 3 randomized controlled studies). Somnolence and insomnia occurred in <15% of patients. Incidence of somnolence was lower than with pregabalin treatment, and insomnia was comparable to that in expectant management or pregabalin treatment. Incidence of nausea and vomiting was higher than in expectant management, but no significant difference was found when compared to expectant management. Conclusion: From the several available studies suitable for indirect comparison, SNRI shows excellent efficacy and tolerability to CIPN. SNRI could provide an important treatment option for CIPN.

No abstract

LNG-IUS treatment in the patients with endometriosis is effective for postoperative pain control and preventing recurrence, however, the LNG-IUS group is older, it is difficult to compare the efficacy between dienogest and LNG-IUS in present study.

To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) use longer than 5 years in women with adenomyosis. Data were retrospectively collected from patients who were treated with LNG-IUD longer than 5 years at the Chungnam National University hospital for adenomyosis diagnosed with ultrasonography from January 2006 to November 2013. A total of 131 patients who were diagnosed with adenomyosis had treated with LNG-IUD longer than 5 years. The mean duration of keeping 1 device without replacement was 58.35 ± 15.98 months, and total duration of LNG-IUD treatment was 83.86 ± 23.88 months. A total of 51 patients stopped using LNG-IUD after 5 years and the mean age at the time of LNG-IUD removal was 52.46 ± 6.9. LNG-IUD treatment had a significant effect on both menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea starting from the first month of insertion (P < .01), which persisted until 6 years when the effect started to plateau. The decrease in uterine volume was not consistent during the treatment period. The uterine volume decreased significantly only in the first and second year of LNG-IUD treatment and then from eighth to tenth year of LNG-IUD treatment (P < .05). Adverse events after insertion of LNG-IUD decreased significantly after 5 years. LNG-IUD treatment longer than 5 years is an effective and feasible method for patients diagnosed with adenomyosis.

Objective This study identified the distribution of lymphocele, as well as the factors associated with lymphocele formation, in patients undergoing pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node dissection (PLND and/or PALND) for gynecologic malignancies. Methods This study was retrospective, and data were collected from patients who underwent surgical procedures including lymphadenectomy due to gynecologic malignancies from March 2013 to May 2016. Lymphocele was defined by postoperative computer tomography within 2 weeks after surgery. Results A total of 116 patients underwent lymphadenectomy, of whom, 47 (42.0%) developed lymphocele and 14 (12.1%) had symptomatic lymphocele formation. The affecting factors of lymphocele formation were PLND concomitant with PALND and a large amount of blood loss ≥600 mL (P=0.030 and P=0.006, respectively). All clinical factors were not significantly different between patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic lymphocele. Lymphocele developed more frequently in the left side (67.1%) of the body compared to the right side (48.7%), and in the pelvic area (75.9%) compared to the para-aortic area (24.1%, P<0.001, both). Conclusion Lymphocele formation is more prevalent in the left and pelvic area of the body compared to the right and paraaortic side. PLND concurrent with PALND and large amounts of blood loss were significant risk factors for lymphocele formation.