The present study was conducted to determine the size of changes and the time point of those changes in biological rhythms during night-shift and whether they are associated with tolerance to shiftwork. The adrenal hormone cortisol has frequently been investigated in the field of shiftwork since it follows a pronounced circadian variation and has been demonstrated to be affected by night-work. However, studies are restricted with respect to sample size, number of measurements or duration of sampling periods. Therefore, a sample of 24 night-shift workers was investigated in a cardiac emergency unit for seven nights. Saliva samples were collected frequently for determination of cortisol. A total of 28 cortisol measurements in each subject were made in order to decide whether the circadian rhythm changed, and if so at which time point. A clear reversal of circadian function could be observed for the total group (mean cortisol concentrations) after the fifth night. However, inspection of individual patterns revealed that six out of 24 subjects did not change in circadian function. These subjects exhibited lower durations of and less consistency in recovery sleep across the following days after night-work. With respect to personality dimensions a pattern associated with neuroticism can be observed in subjects without appropriate changes in cortisol rhythm. However, owing to the small sample size of non-adapters these results are preliminary and should be replicated with larger samples. The overall relationship between neuroticism and low adaptability has been discussed.

Three separate factors relevant to nicotine effects have been investigated in this experiment in combination: the experimentally induced expectation about receiving a sham or a nicotine cigarette, the mode of application of nicotine by a tablet, by a cigarette or not at all, while the belief of receiving the nicotine via smoking was held constant in each condition (by nicotine or sham smoking), and the personality factors of extraversion or neuroticism, respectively. Ninety-six healthy female student smokers were tested in a 2 x 3 x 2 factorial group comparison design with respect to critical flicker fusion and reaction time performance as well as to self-ratings on emotional and cortical arousal and ratings on desire for further cigarettes (satisfaction from smoking a single cigarette containing either 0.8 mg nicotine or a sham cigarette). In each case, a tablet containing either nicotine or placebo was administered together with the cigarette. The results showed that performance is sensitive to interaction effects of instruction and mode of application. The instruction of sham or nicotine assignment when applied with a congruent treatment (sham with a sham cigarette, or nicotine with a nicotine cigarette) both increased performance, while groups with discordant information showed worse performance. The administration of nicotine by tablets or by smoking differs considerably, nicotine cigarettes causing a stronger increase in emotional arousal, tablets rather a decrease or no effect, while the true placebo condition increases arousal due to deprivation effects. This leads to an enhancement of the nicotine effect with real smoking and to reactive increase of effort when sham smoking. The instruction affects alertness, the nicotine illusion leading to a lower reduction in subjective reports of alertness and concentration than that observed with the sham instruction. Neurotic subjects become more anxious and tense with nicotine cigarettes than stable subjects. This effect is less pronounced or even reversed with tablets. No interactions with instructions are observed with neuroticism. Extraverts tend to show a decrease in performance but an increase in alertness with the instruction of receiving nicotine as opposed to the sham expectation, whereas introverts behave the opposite way. Subjective ratings on arousal seem to follow the law of transmarginal inhibition, with extraverts being pushed from low arousal to high and introverts vice versa by the mere expectation.

Responses to examination stress of high and low state anxious students (HSA/LSA) have rarely been investigated with respect to different levels of stress reactions simultaneously. The present study investigated if state anxiety influences biological, emotional, behavioral, and coping reactions to examination stress. According to the state anxiety score obtained immediately before an oral exam in Psychology, extreme groups of 29 LSA and 29 HSA were selected from a total group of 82 students. Dependent variables were biological measures (heart rate, cortisol, secretory immunoglobulin A), selfratings of emotional states, observer ratings on behavior, situational coping behavior and achievement. While no significant differences in biological stress reactions between HSA and LSA students were observed, HSA subjects reported higher emotional and bodily discomfort than LSA, which corresponded to the observer ratings of their behavior, and they received lower grades. HSA subjects were characterized by sensitizing coping strategies, LSA by defensive ones.

No abstract