8.70. 3 Overall, the data could be accounted for by assuming the variable expression of two receptor subtypes across the assays. The rat stomach appeared to express a single receptor characterized by a low affinity constant for L-365,260 (pKB-7.5). The guinea-pig gastric muscle and mouse stomach data could be explained by the presence of this receptor and a second one characterized by a high affinity constant for ). The activity of the two proposed receptor subtypes was consistent between experiments in the guinea-pig and the high affinity receptor appeared to be predominant. In contrast, the mouse stomach data could only be simulated by assuming that the proportion and absolute number of each subtype varied significantly between the replicate experiments. 4 The L-365,260 affinity estimates at the inferred receptor subtypes were indistinguishable from those obtained in a corresponding analysis of the behaviour of L-365,260 in CCKB/gastrin receptor radioligand binding experiments in guinea-pig gastric gland and mouse and rat cerebral cortex preparations.
A 1,3,4-benzotriazepine was identified as a suitable lead in our effort toward obtaining a non-peptide parathyroid hormone-1 receptor (PTH1R) antagonist. A process of optimization afforded derivatives displaying nanomolar PTH1R affinity, a representative example of which behaved as a PTH1R antagonist in cell-based cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) assays, with selectivity over PTH2 receptors.
Starting from a novel, achiral 1,3,4-benzotriazepine-based CCK2 receptor antagonist, a process of optimization has afforded further compounds of this type that maintain the nanomolar affinity for recombinant, human CCK2 receptors and high selectivity over CCK1 receptors observed in the initial lead but display more potent inhibition of pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion in vivo. Moreover, this has largely been achieved without altering their potency at wild-type canine and rat receptors, as judged by their displacement of [125I]-BH-CCK-8S in a radioligand binding assay and by their activity in an isolated, perfused rat stomach bioassay, respectively. 2-(5-Cyclohexyl-1-(2-cyclopentyl-2-oxo-ethyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydro-3H-1,3,4-benzotriazepin-3-yl)-N-(3-(5-oxo-2,5-dihydro- [1,2,4]oxadiazol-3-yl)-phenyl)-acetamide (47) was identified as the most effective compound stemming from this approach, proving to be a potent inhibitor of pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion in rats and dogs by intravenous bolus as well as by enteral administration.
The systematic optimization of the structure of a novel 2,4,5-trisubstituted imidazole-based cholecystokinin-2 (CCK(2)) receptor antagonist afforded analogues with nanomolar receptor affinity. These compounds were now comparable in their potency to the bicyclic heteroaromatic-based compounds 5 (JB93182) and 6 (JB95008), from which the initial examples were designed using a field-point based molecular modeling approach. They were also orally active as judged by their inhibition of pentagastrin stimulated acid secretion in conscious dogs, in contrast to the bicyclic heteroaromatic-based compounds, which were ineffective because of biliary elimination. Increasing the hydrophilicity through replacement of a particular methylene group with an ether oxygen, as in 3-{[5-(adamantan-1-yloxymethyl)-2-cyclohexyl-1H-imidazole-4-carbonyl]amino}benzoic acid (53), had little effect on the receptor affinity but significantly increased the oral potency. Comparison of the plasma pharmacokinetics and the inhibition of pentagastrin-stimulated acid output following bolus intraduodenal administration of both 53 and 6 indicated that 53 was well absorbed, had a longer half-life, and was not subject to the elimination pathways of the earlier series.
In the course of structural explorations around a series of potent CCK2 receptor antagonists, it was noted that simple N-methylation of the indolic N-H in the parent molecule gave rise to behavior in vivo that was consistent with the compound acting as an agonist. Exploration in vitro confirmed this property, and it was shown that the agonist action could be blocked by the reference CCK2 receptor antagonist, L-365,260. Further examples of this type of modification were explored, and a common theme with regard to agonist behavior was uncovered. Some molecular modeling is also presented in an attempt to throw light on the nature of the ligand receptor interactions that may be giving rise to the differing properties of these, apparently, structurally similar molecules.
(pKB 9.1,, in the absence and presence of famotidine, respectively) was approximately 30 fold more potent than either L-365,260 (pKB 7.4, -7.1) or PD 134,308 (PKB -7.6, -7.4).4 It was assumed that the famotidine treatment converted pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion from a combination of an indirect action due to the release of histamine and a direct action on the oxyntic cell to solely a direct action on the oxyntic cell. A simple mathematical model of this two-receptor system was developed. The direct and indirect components were assumed to sum to produce the total response to pentagastrin obtained in the absence of famotidine. It was found that this model could account quantitatively for the behaviour of the three antagonists without invoking a difference in antagonist affinity for the CCKB/gastrin receptors mediating the direct and indirect actions of pentagastrin. However, a conclusion of receptor homogeneity has to be qualified because the model was also used to generate simulations which indicated that the analysis could only detect antagonist affinity differences of greater than one log-unit between enterochromaffin-like (ECL) and oxyntic cell CCKB/gastrin receptor populations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.