SummaryContextInsulin‐binding antibodies may produce severe dysglycaemia in insulin‐naïve patients (‘insulin autoimmune syndrome’ (IAS) or Hirata disease), while rendering routine insulin assays unreliable.ObjectiveTo assess the performance of clinically used insulin assays and an optimal analytical approach in the context of IAS.DesignObservational biochemical study of selected patients with hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia.PatientsThree patients without diabetes with recurrent spontaneous hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia and ‘positive’ insulin antibodies.MeasurementsA panel of clinically used insulin assays (Siemens ADVIA ® Centaur, Siemens Immulite® 2000, DiaSorin LIAISON ® XL, PE AutoDELFIA ® and the Beckman Coulter Access® 2) were used before and after plasma dilution or polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation. Anti‐insulin IgG antibodies were measured by Isletest™‐IAA ELISA. Gel filtration chromatography (GFC) was undertaken with and without preincubation of plasma with exogenous insulin.ResultsDilution of IAS plasma with assay‐specific buffer increased insulin recovery, supporting negative immunoassay interference by antibodies. PEG precipitation of IAS plasma decreased insulin recovery using all assays except the Immulite® 2000. GFC discriminated high molecular weight and monomeric insulin, while ex vivo addition of exogenous insulin to plasma increased insulin bound to antibody, thereby improving the sensitivity of detection of insulin immunocomplexes.ConclusionsImmunoprecipitation with PEG must be used with caution in screening for insulin–antibody complexes as results are assay dependent. GFC with addition of exogenous insulin can identify significant insulin immunocomplexes with enhanced sensitivity, with attendant greater clinical utility and avoidance of radiolabelled reagents.
Context:Familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia, characterized by abnormal circulating albumin with increased T4 affinity, causes artefactual elevation of free T4 concentrations in euthyroid individuals.Objective:Four unrelated index cases with discordant thyroid function tests in different assay platforms were investigated.Design and Results:Laboratory biochemical assessment, radiolabeled T4 binding studies, and ALB sequencing were undertaken. 125I-T4 binding to both serum and albumin in affected individuals was markedly increased, comparable with known familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia cases. Sequencing showed heterozygosity for a novel ALB mutation (arginine to isoleucine at codon 222, R222I) in all four cases and segregation of the genetic defect with abnormal biochemical phenotype in one family. Molecular modeling indicates that arginine 222 is located within a high-affinity T4 binding site in albumin, with substitution by isoleucine, which has a smaller side chain predicted to reduce steric hindrance, thereby facilitating T4 and rT3 binding. When tested in current immunoassays, serum free T4 values from R222I heterozygotes were more measurably abnormal in one-step vs two-step assay architectures. Total rT3 measurements were also abnormally elevated.Conclusions:A novel mutation (R222I) in the ALB gene mediates dominantly inherited dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia. Susceptibility of current free T4 immunoassays to interference by this mutant albumin suggests likely future identification of individuals with this variant binding protein.
Background: Antithyroglobulin antibodies are a prevalent cause of interference in serum thyroglobulin immunoassays. Current guidelines recommend that antithyroglobulin antibodies should be measured concurrently with thyroglobulin when monitoring thyroid cancer patients post-thyroidectomy. However, the concordance between different antithyroglobulin assays has been questioned despite the availability of an international thyroglobulin antibody Reference Preparation. Methods: Four antithyroglobulin assays currently in use in UK laboratories (Siemens Immulite
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.