Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is absolutely required for survival of dopaminergic (DA) nigrostriatal neurons and protect them from toxic insults. Hence, it is a promising, albeit experimental, therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the source of striatal GDNF is not well known. GDNF seems to be normally synthesized in neurons, but numerous reports suggest GDNF production in glial cells, particularly in the injured brain. We have studied in detail striatal GDNF production in normal mouse and after damage of DA neurons with MPTP. Striatal GDNF mRNA was present in neonates but markedly increased during the first 2-3 postnatal weeks. Cellular identification of GDNF by unequivocal histochemical methods demonstrated that in normal or injured adult animals GDNF is expressed by striatal neurons and is not synthesized in significant amounts by astrocytes or microglial cells. GDNF mRNA expression was not higher in reactive astrocytes than in normal ones. Approximately 95% of identified neostriatal GDNF-expressing cells in normal and injured animals are parvalbumin-positive (PVϩ) interneurons, which only represent ϳ0.7% of all striatal neurons. The remaining 5% of GDNFϩ cells are cholinergic and somatostatinϩ interneurons. Surprisingly, medium spiny projection neurons (MSNs), the vast majority of striatal neurons that receive a strong DA innervation, do not express GDNF. PVϩ interneurons constitute an oscillatory functional ensemble of electrically connected cells that control MSNs' firing. Production of GDNF in the PVϩ neurons might be advantageous to supply synchronous activity-dependent release of GDNF in broad areas of the striatum. Stimulation of the GDNF-producing striatal PVϩ ensemble in PD patients could have therapeutic effects.

The floor plate (FP), a signaling center and a structure rich in radial glia-like cells, has been traditionally thought to be devoid of neurons and neuronal progenitors. However, in the midbrain, the FP contains neurons of the dopaminergic (DA) lineage that require contact with radial glia-like cells for their induction. We, therefore, decided to explore the interaction relationship between radial glia and neurons during DA neurogenesis. Taking advantage of a novel FP radial glia-like cell culture system and retroviruses, DA neurons were lineage traced in vitro. In utero BrdU pulse-chases extensively labeled the midbrain FP and traced DA neurons both in vivo and in FP cultures. Moreover, from E9.5 to E13.5 the midbrain FP contained dividing cells only in the most apical part of the neuroepithelium, in cells identified as radial glia-like cells. We, therefore, hypothesized that midbrain FP radial glia-like cells could be DA progenitors and tested our hypothesis in vivo. Lineage tracing of DA progenitors with EGFP in Tis21-EGFP knock-in mice, and genetic fate mapping in GLAST::CreERT2/ZEG mice identified the neuroepithelium of the midbrain FP, and specifically, GLAST+ radial glia-like cells as DA progenitors. Combined, our experiments support the concept that the midbrain FP differs from other FP regions and demonstrate that FP radial glia-like cells in the midbrain are neurogenic and give rise to midbrain DA neurons.

Here we describe a simple and efficient protocol for derivation of germline chimera-competent mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) from embryonic day 3.5 (E3.5) blastocysts. The protocol involves the use of early-passage mouse embryonic fibroblast feeders (MEF) and the alternation of fetal bovine serum- and serum replacement (SR)-containing media. As compared to other available protocols for mESCs derivation, our protocol differs in the combination of commercial availability of all reagents, technical simplicity and high efficiency. mESC lines are derived with approximately 50% efficiency (50 independent mESC lines derived from 96 blastocysts). We believe that this protocol could be a good starting point for (i) setting up the derivation of mESC lines in a laboratory and (ii) incorporating further steps to improve efficiency or adapt the protocol to other applications. The whole process (from blastocyst extraction to the freezing of mESC line) usually takes between 15 and 20 d.

Mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) represent a unique tool for many researchers; however, the process of ESC derivation is often very inefficient and requires high specialization, training, and expertise. To circumvent these limitations, we aimed to develop a simple and efficient protocol based on the use of commercially available products. Here, we present an optimized protocol that we successfully applied to derive ESCs from several knockout mouse strains (Wnt-1, Wnt-5a, Lrp6, and parkin) with 50%-75% efficiency. The methodology is based on the use of mouse embryonic fibroblast feeders, knockout serum replacement (SR), and minimal handling of the blastocyst. In this protocol, all centrifugation steps (as well as the use of trypsin inhibitor) were avoided and replaced by an ESC medium containing fetal calf serum (FCS) after the trypsinizations. We define the potential advantages and disadvantages of using SR and FCS in individual steps of the protocol. We also characterize the ESCs for the expression of ESC markers by immunohistochemistry, Western blot, and a stem cell focused microarray. In summary, we provide a simplified and improved protocol to derive mESCs that can be useful for laboratories aiming to isolate transgenic mESCs for the first time. STEM CELLS 2006;24:844 -849

CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling has been reported to regulate three essential processes for the establishment of neural networks in different neuronal systems: neuronal migration, cell positioning and axon wiring. However, it is not known whether it regulates the development of A9-A10 tyrosine hydroxylase positive (TH + ) midbrain dopaminergic (mDA) neurons. We report here that Cxcl12 is expressed in the meninges surrounding the ventral midbrain (VM), whereas CXCR4 is present in NURR1 + mDA precursors and mDA neurons from E10.5 to E14.5. CXCR4 is activated in NURR1 + cells as they migrate towards the meninges. Accordingly, VM meninges and CXCL12 promoted migration and neuritogenesis of TH + cells in VM explants in a CXCR4-dependent manner. Moreover, in vivo electroporation of Cxcl12 at E12.5 in the basal plate resulted in lateral migration, whereas expression in the midline resulted in retention of TH + cells in the IZ close to the midline. Analysis of Cxcr4 −/− mice revealed the presence of VM TH + cells with disoriented processes in the intermediate zone (IZ) at E11.5 and marginal zone (MZ) at E14. Consistently, pharmacological blockade of CXCR4 or genetic deletion of Cxcr4 resulted in an accumulation of TH + cells in the lateral aspect of the IZ at E14, indicating that CXCR4 is required for the radial migration of mDA neurons in vivo. Altogether, our findings demonstrate that CXCL12/CXCR4 regulates the migration and orientation of processes in A9-A10 mDA neurons.

Secreted Frizzled related proteins (sFRPs) are a family of proteins that modulate Wnt signaling, which in turn regulates multiple aspects of ventral midbrain (VM) and dopamine (DA) neuron development. However, it is not known which Wnt signaling branch and what aspects of midbrain DA neuron development are regulated by sFRPs. Here, we show that sFRP1 and sFRP2 activate the Wnt/planar-cellpolarity/Rac1 pathway in DA cells. In the developing VM, sFRP1 and sFRP2 are expressed at low levels, and sFRP12/ 2 or sFRP22/2 mice had no detectable phenotype. However, compound sFRP12/2;sFRP22/2 mutants revealed a Wnt/PCP phenotype similar to that previously described for Wnt5a2/2 mice. This included an anteroposterior shortening of the VM, a lateral expansion of the Shh domain and DA lineage markers (Lmx1a and Th), as well as an accumulation of Nurr11 precursors in the VM. In vitro experiments showed that, while very high concentrations of SFRP1 had a negative effect on cell survival, low/medium concentrations of sFRP1 or sFRP2 promoted the DA differentiation of progenitors derived from primary VM cultures or mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs), mimicking the effects of Wnt5a. We thus conclude that the main function of sFRP1 and sFRP2 is to enhance Wnt/PCP signaling in DA cells and to regulate Wnt/PCP-dependent functions in midbrain development. Moreover, we suggest that lowmedium concentrations of sFRPs may be used to enhance the DA differentiation of ESCs and improve their therapeutic application. STEM CELLS 2012;30:865-875 Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

No abstract

No abstract