Background
Although currently approved therapies for Alzheimer’s dementia (AD) are used to treat impairments in memory and function, there is an unmet need for additional symptomatic therapies in mild‐to‐moderate AD. As N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor hypofunction has been hypothesised to be associated with cognitive impairment in AD, improving post‐synaptic NMDA receptor signalling through glycine transporter 1 (GlyT1) inhibition may improve cognitive function. This proof of clinical concept study investigated the efficacy and safety of the investigational drug BI 425809, a GlyT1 inhibitor, in mild‐to‐moderate AD and evaluated dose‐ranging data to define a suitable dose of BI 425809 in this population.
Method
A Phase II, multicentre, double‐blind, parallel‐group study including patients aged ≥55 years with mild‐to‐moderate AD (according to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for AD), a mini‐mental state exam score of 15–26 at screening, and a reliable study partner who was in close contact with the patient and could contribute to the neuropsychological rating scales. Concomitant acetylcholinesterase inhibitor use was permitted but not required. Eligible patients were randomised (1:1:1:1:1) to receive BI 425809 2, 5, 10, 25 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale‐cognitive subscale (ADAS‐Cog11) total score at Week 12. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study/Activities of Daily Living score and Clinician's Interview‐Based Impression of Change at Week 12. The pre‐specified primary analyses for proof of concept and dose finding was the multiple comparison procedure with modelling for mixed model repeated measures. Adverse events were evaluated throughout the study.
Result
A total of 610 patients were randomised. No significant non‐flat dose‐response relationship was detected for the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints similarly did not detect any significant benefit for BI 425809 treatment groups compared with placebo. BI 425809 was generally well tolerated with no new safety issues identified.
Conclusion
No clinically meaningful changes from baseline were observed across a range of BI 425809 doses administered to patients with mild‐to‐moderate AD. Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim: Study 1346‐0023 (NCT02788513).
Background
There are currently no approved medications for cognition in patients with schizophrenia. BI 425809, a glycine transporter 1 inhibitor, increases glycine in the synaptic cleft and may improve glutamatergic neurotransmission, synaptic neuroplasticity, and cognition. Pharmacotherapies targeting neuroplasticity may require concurrent cognitive stimulation, and often the surroundings of patients with schizophrenia provide only a low level of cognitive demand. At-home computerised cognitive training (CCT) should increase the level of cognitive stimulation for these patients. Combining CCT with pharmacotherapy could therefore improve cognition in patients with schizophrenia. CCT studies are currently limited in scale and are associated with challenges, such as patient compliance.
This ongoing study explores whether at-home CCT combined with BI 425809 could improve cognition, as compared with patients on at-home CCT and placebo, in patients with schizophrenia. Here, we provide an initial reflection on the experiences and challenges associated with setting up this large-scale clinical trial, in addition to an update on recruitment trajectories.
Methods
This is a Phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial in patients with schizophrenia on stable antipsychotic therapy, across ~50 centres in 6 countries. Recruitment commenced in June 2019. Patients (aged 18–50 years) must demonstrate compliance with CCT during a 2-week run-in period; this means completing at least 2 hours/week (i.e. 4 hours total during screening). Only CCT-compliant patients are randomised (1:1) to BI 425809 or placebo once daily on top of CCT for 12 weeks. The target duration for at-home CCT is ~30 hours, across 3–5 sessions (2.5 hours total) per week. The primary endpoint is change from baseline in neurocognitive composite score of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery after 12 weeks of treatment. Novel exploratory endpoints include the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool to assess daily functioning and the Balloon Effort Task to assess motivation in cognitive performance and, its association with patients’ willingness to comply with at-home CCT.
Results
To date, 32 patients have been screened and 11 randomised (21 patients failed screening, primarily due to non-compliance with CCT run-in). The last patient out is planned for December 2020 and results are expected in Q1 2021. Patients randomised so far (n=11; 82% male) have a mean age of 33 years; those who failed screening (n=21; 67% male) have a mean age of 36 years. Mean MCCB total scores for the two groups are 30.9 and 22.3; Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANNS) total scores: 71.3 vs 77.9; and PANNS negative symptom scores: 20.5 vs 20.3, for the randomised and screen failure patients, respectively.
Discussion
It is expected that the results of this trial will help to: indicate if there is an enhanced benefit of combining pharmacotherapy with cognitive stimulation through at-home CCT; and determine the role of motivation in CCT compliance and performance in patients with schizophrenia. The main reason for screen failures was non-compliance with CCT run-in, underscoring the relevance of coaching and motivational accompaniment to promote adherence to CCT. The results will indicate if large-scale implementation of at-home CCT across multiple centres and several countries is feasible.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.