Rockbursts represent hazardous dynamic disasters for underground coal mines and other underground rock engineering projects. Some bursting liability indices are put forward and applied to identify the likelihood of rock burst occurrence. The classification criteria of the bursting liability indices are proved to be reasonable for coals, but they are still immature for non-coal rocks. Thus, it is uncertain that it is reasonable to use the classification criteria of coal for evaluating the bursting liability of non-coal rocks. Hence, in this study, a large amount of data, such as the basic mechanical parameters, i.e., Poisson’s ratio μ, elastic modulus E, uniaxial compressive strength σc, and uniaxial tensile strength σt, and the bursting liability indices, i.e., elastic strain energy index WET, bursting energy index Wcf, dynamic fracture duration time DT, and brittleness index B, of different coals and non-coal rocks were collected in China. Then, the differences of mechanical parameters and rockburst tendency indices between coal and non-coal rocks were studied systematically, and apart from the Poisson’s ratio μ, the other three basic mechanical parameters of coal and non-coal rocks have great differences in data distribution and concentration scope, which proved that the non-coal rocks cannot share the same index system and classification criteria of coals. In addition, the evaluation results of a single index for rock bursting liability of rocks were directly compared in pairs, and the inconsistency rate for coals is about 42–68%. It is necessary to build a comprehensive evaluation method to evaluate the bursting liability of rocks. At last, the modified rockburst tendency classification criteria for non-coal rocks were put forward. It is reasonable to use the classification criteria of the WET and Wcf to classify the bursting liability of non-coal rocks, while it is unreasonable to use that of the DT and σc. It has been concluded that the index B are more suitable for non-coal rocks, and a new index, named strength decrease rate (SDR), was proposed to determine the bursting liability, which is the ratio of uniaxial compressive strength σc to duration of dynamic fracture DT.
Rockburst is one of the common geological hazards. It is of great significance to study the evaluation indexes and classification criteria of the bursting liability of hard rocks, which is important for the prediction and prevention of rockbursts in hard rocks. In this study, the evaluation of the rockburst tendency was conducted using two indoor non-energy indexes, namely the brittleness indicator (B2) and the strength decrease rate (SDR). The measuring methods of B and SDR as well as the classification criteria were analyzed. Firstly, the most rational calculation formulas for B and SDR were selected based on previous studies. The B2 equaled to the ratio between the difference and sum of uniaxial compressive strength and Brazilian tensile strength of rocks. The SDR was the average stress decrease rate of the post-peak stage in uniaxial compression tests and equaled the uniaxial compressive strength dividing the duration time of post-peak rock failure in uniaxial compression tests. Secondly, the uniaxial compression tests of different rock types were designed and carried out, and the change trend of B and SDR with the increase of loading rate in uniaxial compression tests were studied in detail. The results showed that after the loading rate was greater than 5 mm/min or 100 kN/min, the B value was affected, limited by the loading rate, while the SDR value was more affected by the strain rate. The displacement control, with a loading rate of 0.1–0.7 mm/min, was recommended for the measurement of B and SDR. The classification criteria of B2 and SDR were proposed, and four grades of rockburst tendency were defined for SDR and B2 according to the test results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.