The data suggest that DT has acceptable overall accuracy and reliability as a screening tool for testing distress severity and specific problems causing distress in Chinese cancer patients. It is worth being used in oncology clinic, the rapid screening and interview could help caregivers to identify psychological and psychiatric problems of cancer patients and provide useful information for further treatment.

Objective:We investigated the effect of stoma status (permanent stoma, temporary stoma, or non-stoma) on psychological distress and quality of life (QOL) in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in the early postoperative stage. We also investigated whether body image mediated the association between stoma status and psychological distress and QOL. Methods: A convenience sample of 282 CRC patients 1 to 2 weeks postsurgery participated in an observational, cross-sectional study. Participants completed the following self-report measures: Body Image Scale, Distress Thermometer, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Core Quality of Life Questionnaire. Results: The temporary stoma group (TS) and the permanent stoma group (PS) reported worse body image and higher levels of anxiety and depression than the non-stoma group (P < .05). PS reported worse body image than TS (P < .01). Depression and significant body image problems were more prevalent in PS than in TS (P < .05). Stoma status was the strongest factor associated with body image, distress, and depression (P < .05). CRC patients who were younger or in later clinical stages had poorer body image. Body image fully mediated the effect of stoma status on anxiety, depression, and global QOL in PS and TS, but mediated the effect on distress only in PS. Conclusions: Body image problems are common in stoma patients in the early postoperative stage and require early assessment. This study helps to elucidate the role of body image as a mediator. Longitudinal studies are needed to further explore body image distress trajectories. K E Y W O R D S anxiety, body image, cancer, China, colorectal, depression, distress, oncology, quality of life

BackgroundTo evaluate the relationship between quality of life (QOL) and physical as well as psychological variables in Chinese breast cancer patients.MethodsThis multicenter cross-sectional study enrolled 254 Chinese breast cancer patients in different stages and treatment phases. They answered standard instruments assessing QOL (EORTC), somatic symptom severity (PHQ-15), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), health-related anxiety (WI-7), illness perception (BIPQ), and sense of coherence (SOC-9). Canonical correlation was applied to identify the strongest correlates between the physical, emotional and social QOL scales and the physical and psychological variables.ResultsIn our sample, a low global QOL was significantly associated with the following physical and psychological variables: symptom-related disability (Karnofsky Index) (r = .211, p < .01), somatic symptom severity (r = −.391, p < .001), depression (r = −.488, p < .001), anxiety (r = −.439, p < .001), health-related anxiety (r = −.398, p < .001), dysfunctional illness perception (r = −.411, p < .001), and sense of coherence (r = .371, p < .001). In the canonical correlation analysis, high somatic symptom severity, depression, anxiety, dysfunctional illness perception, and low sense of coherence showed the strongest correlations with low physical, emotional and social functioning. The first three significant canonical correlations between these two sets of variables were .78, .56, and .45.ConclusionsQOL in Chinese breast cancer patients is strongly associated with psychological factors. Our results suggest that Chinese physicians and nurses should incorporate these factors into their care for women with breast cancer to improve patients’ QOL.

The CST showed high acceptance and led to significantly improved performance ratings of participating physicians in many areas. It helped participants deal with conflicting demands. For future trainings, further socio-cultural adaptations are needed. Obvious conflicts still exist and need to be resolved.

No abstract

High somatic symptom burden in breast cancer is associated with physical and psychosocial features. The results are a basis for further research to evaluate the new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, SSD concept in cancer patients and to better operationalize psychobehavioral factors in this patient group.

IntroductionAn electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) platform is needed for implementing evidence-based symptom management in outpatients with advanced cancer. We describe the overall protocol and the methodology for measuring symptom burden, to provide critical parameters needed to implement symptom management on the ePRO platform.Methods and analysisThe study focusses on patients with advanced lung cancer, stomach cancer, oesophagus cancer, liver cancer, colorectal cancer or breast cancer. The primary outcome is the change of symptom burden. MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, and other PRO instruments (Insomnia Severity Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire and EuroQol-5 dimensions-5 levels version) were used. The secondary outcomes include feasibility of using ePRO, symptom-related quality of life, reasons for no improvement of symptoms, defining frequency of PRO assessments and cut-points, items for screening and management of comorbidity and satisfaction with ePRO platform in patients and health providers. After initial outpatient visit for baseline assessment, ePRO system will automatically send follow-up notification seven times over 4 weeks to patients. The characteristics and changing trajectory of symptoms of patients will be described. Parameters for using PROs, such as optimal time points for follow-up and cut-off point for alert will be determined. The feasibility of ePRO platform to track the changes of target symptoms in outpatients will be evaluated.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol and related documents were approved by the Institutional Research Board (IRB) of Peking University Cancer Hospital on 13 February 2019 (2019YJZ07). The results of this study will be disseminated through academic workshops, peer-reviewed publications and conferences.Trial registration numberChiCTR1900023560.

No abstract