Publications from Japan have been on the decline, and this tendency is expected to continue as the country’s population decreases. During the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, it was discovered that Japanese medical trainees published much fewer papers than trainees from other nations. This issue must be addressed by the entire Japanese medical community.
Trainees have the potential to contribute to the medical community through their publishing process presenting fresh perspectives and communicating accurate information to the public through the use of social media. Furthermore, trainees themselves would benefit as they would become more enhanced by deeply and critically considering the contents and the trends of publications worldwide, which would promote further implementation of evidence-based medicine.
Therefore, medical educators and students should be motivated and encouraged to write by offering enough instructional and publication opportunities. Such measures would be to (1) train students in “medical writing” as part of the medical curriculum; (2) encourage medical students and trainees to submit of manuscripts, especially in the section of the letters, opinions, and case reports; (3) guarantee trainees time and resources to write; (4) provide as constructive reviews and comments as possible as an educational opportunity for trainees; and (5) motivate trainees to write.
Such hands-on training would necessitate significant efforts of the trainees, instructors, and publishers. However, if we cannot invest in fostering future resources now, we may not be able to hope for increase in the amount of research published from Japan. The future lies in everybody’s hands.
The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically changed education systems as most governments around the world closed schools to prevent outbreaks on campus. Medical education was not immune from these policies, and medical students were deprived of opportunities, particularly in clinical training. To determine how countries worldwide have responded to the pandemic, we conducted a literature review of the policies and guidelines of four countries: Japan, the United States (USA), the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia, as well as case reports of faculty and medical students up to September, 2020. Although the methods of implementation were unique to each country, the concept of “returning medical students to live education as quickly and safely as possible” was common. However, the extent to which students and faculty members became engaged in the treatment process of COVID-19 varied. While some countries endorsed students to work as members of medical staff to treat COVID-19, other countries took measures to ensure the safety of both medical students and patients. We await further reports worldwide in order to better understand the strategies employed by different nations in preparation for future possible infection outbreaks.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.