Summary Phytochrome B (phyB) is an excellent light quality and quantity sensor that can detect subtle changes in the light environment. The relative amounts of the biologically active photoreceptor (phyB Pfr) are determined by the light conditions and light independent thermal relaxation of Pfr into the inactive phyB Pr, termed thermal reversion. Little is known about the regulation of thermal reversion and how it affects plants’ light sensitivity. In this study we identified several serine/threonine residues on the N‐terminal extension (NTE) of Arabidopsis thaliana phyB that are differentially phosphorylated in response to light and temperature, and examined transgenic plants expressing nonphosphorylatable and phosphomimic phyB mutants. The NTE of phyB is essential for thermal stability of the Pfr form, and phosphorylation of S86 particularly enhances the thermal reversion rate of the phyB Pfr–Pr heterodimer in vivo. We demonstrate that S86 phosphorylation is especially critical for phyB signaling compared with phosphorylation of the more N‐terminal residues. Interestingly, S86 phosphorylation is reduced in light, paralleled by a progressive Pfr stabilization under prolonged irradiation. By investigating other phytochromes (phyD and phyE) we provide evidence that acceleration of thermal reversion by phosphorylation represents a general mechanism for attenuating phytochrome signaling.

Summary Shade and warmth promote the growth of the stem, but the degree of mechanistic convergence and functional association between these responses is not clear. We analysed the quantitative impact of mutations and natural genetic variation on the hypocotyl growth responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to shade and warmth, the relationship between the abundance of PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 4 (PIF4) and growth stimulation by shade or warmth, the effects of both cues on the transcriptome and the consequences of warm temperature on carbon balance. Growth responses to shade and warmth showed strong genetic linkage and similar dependence on PIF4 levels. Temperature increased growth and phototropism even within a range where damage by extreme high temperatures is unlikely to occur in nature. Both cues enhanced the expression of growth‐related genes and reduced the expression of photosynthetic genes. However, only warmth enhanced the expression of genes involved in responses to heat. Warm temperatures substantially increased the amount of light required to compensate for the daily carbon dioxide balance. We propose that the main ecological function of hypocotyl growth responses to warmth is to increase the access of shaded photosynthetic organs to light, which implies functional convergence with shade avoidance.