BackgroundWhat constitutes respectful maternity care (RMC) operationally in research and programme implementation is often variable.ObjectivesTo develop a conceptualisation of RMC.Search strategyKey databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Global Health Library, grey literature, and reference lists of relevant studies.Selection criteriaPrimary qualitative studies focusing on care occurring during labour, childbirth, and/or immediately postpartum in health facilities, without any restrictions on locations or publication date.Data collection and analysisA combined inductive and deductive approach was used to synthesise the data; the GRADE CERQual approach was used to assess the level of confidence in review findings.Main resultsSixty‐seven studies from 32 countries met our inclusion criteria. Twelve domains of RMC were synthesised: being free from harm and mistreatment; maintaining privacy and confidentiality; preserving women's dignity; prospective provision of information and seeking of informed consent; ensuring continuous access to family and community support; enhancing quality of physical environment and resources; providing equitable maternity care; engaging with effective communication; respecting women's choices that strengthen their capabilities to give birth; availability of competent and motivated human resources; provision of efficient and effective care; and continuity of care. Globally, women's perspectives of what constitutes RMC are quite consistent.ConclusionsThis review presents an evidence‐based typology of RMC in health facilities globally, and demonstrates that the concept is broader than a reduction of disrespectful care or mistreatment of women during childbirth. Innovative approaches should be developed and tested to integrate RMC as a routine component of quality maternal and newborn care programmes.Tweetable abstractUnderstanding respectful maternity care – synthesis of evidence from 67 qualitative studies.

Objetivo.Esta revisión sintetiza la evidencia cuantitativa, general y desglosada por categorías tipológicas de la falta de respeto y maltrato en la atención institucional del parto y el aborto en América Latina y el Caribe.Métodos.Mediante búsquedas sistemáticas se identificaron 18 estudios primarios. Se calcularon Q e I2y se realizaron metaanálisis, metarregresiones y análisis de subgrupos con la aplicación de un modelo de Der Simonian-Laird de efectos aleatorios agrupados con varianza inversa y la transformación arco-seno doble de Freeman-Tukey.Resultados.Se identificaron estudios realizados en cinco países de América Latina. No se identificaron estudios del Caribe. La prevalencia agregada de falta de respeto y maltrato durante el parto y el aborto fue de 39%. La medida agregada para este fenómeno durante el parto fue de 43% y la medida agregada en los casos de aborto fue de 29%. La heterogeneidad elevada no permitió generar medidas agregadas según categorías tipológicas. No obstante, se presentan las frecuencias de formas específicas del fenómeno agrupadas tipológicamente.Conclusiones.La evidencia sugiere que la falta de respeto y maltrato durante la atención del parto y el aborto son problemas de derechos humanos y salud pública prevalentes en algunos países de la Región. Es necesario lograr consenso internacional sobre la definición y operacionalización de este problema y desarrollar métodos estandarizados para su medición. Lo anterior es imprescindible para el alcance de las metas de la Agenda 2030 relacionadas con la reducción de la morbimortalidad maternoperinatal y la eliminación de todas las formas de violencia y discriminación contra la mujer.

No abstract

BackgroundStudies show that a large number of women around the world have experienced situations of abuse, disrespect, abuse, and neglect during childbirth and/or abortion. This violence is a serious violation of the rights of women, especially because it is a period in which the woman is more physiologically, socially, and psychologically vulnerable. Although this type of violence is known, there is still no international consensus on the definition of such violence and its prevalence is not known. In this sense, this systematic review aims (1) to find quantitative data about abuse and disrespect in obstetric care (delivery and/or abortion) in Latin America and the Caribbean to estimate the average prevalence of this type of abuse and (2) to identify interventions—including programs, laws, and regulations—which have been implemented to prevent or respond to abuse and disrespect in childbirth process and abortion situation, evaluating its effectiveness on a global scale.MethodsFor this, we will use a refined and pre-established strategy to search databases such as PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and Scielo, and the studies found will pass through a selection process to complete the screening stage.DiscussionData will be extracted using standardized forms with the following information: scope of study, sample characteristics, objectives, design, data collection, methods of analysis, data source, and results. Considering the heterogeneity of the definitions of abuse, disrespect, and mistreatment of women in labor or abortion, it may not be possible to carry out the meta-analysis of the frequency of events reported in the included articles. Events reported by the original articles will be classified according to a typology of abuse, disrespect, and maltreatment in the labor or abortion process described by Bohren et al. (PLoS Med, 2015).Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42016038651 Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0516-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.