Artificial light can be used as a management tool to increase milk yield in dairy production. However, little is known about how cows respond to the spectral composition of light. The aim of this study was to investigate how dairy cows respond to artificial achromatic and chromatic lights. A tie-stall barn equipped with light-emitting diode (LED) light fixtures was used to create the controlled experimental light environments. Two experiments were conducted, both using dairy cows of Swedish Red and light mixtures with red, blue or white light. In experiment I, the response to light of increasing intensity on pupil size was evaluated in five pregnant non-lactating cows. In experiment II 16h of achromatic and chromatic daylight in combination with dim, achromatic night light, was tested on pregnant lactating cows during five weeks to observe long term effects on milk production, activity and circadian rhythms. Particular focus was given to possible carry over effects of blue light during the day on activity at night since this has been demonstrated in humans. Increasing intensity of white and blue light affected pupil size (P<0.001), but there was no effect on pupil size with increased intensity of red light. Milk yield was maintained throughout experiment II, and plasma melatonin was higher during dim night light than in daylight for all treatments (P<0.001). In conclusion, our results show that LED fixtures emitting red light driving the ipRGCs indirectly via ML-cones, blue light stimulating both S-cones and ipRGCs directly and a mixture of wavelengths (white light) exert similar effects on milk yield and activity in tied-up dairy cows. This suggests that the spectral composition of LED lighting in a barn is secondary to duration and intensity.
Light can be used as a management tool to increase milk yield in dairy cows and improve the working conditions for barn staff. It is known that a long day photoperiod, with 16 hours of light and 8 hours of darkness, can increase milk yield in an ongoing lactation. Modern LED lighting can be designed to emit specific wavelengths, opening up possibilities for discussing the most favorable type of light for dairy cows. This thesis investigated the role of light environment and the impact of light intensity, spectral composition and uniformity on dairy cows. In initial studies, a light lab with a controlled light environment and no external light was used. The response to red, blue, and white light of increasing intensity on pupil size was evaluated in five pregnant non-lactating cows. Red light did not constrict the pupil but the other light colors did, indicating that direct stimulation of ipRGCs may be required for a pupillary response to steady background light. A five-week study on 40 pregnant and lactating cows involving 16 hours of blue, red or white light in daytime and 8 hours of dim, white light at night did not show effects of light color during daytime on milk production. Plasma melatonin concentration was higher in dim night light than in daylight for all light treatments. To examine cow movements in light of different intensity, spectrum and uniformity, 12 pregnant, non-lactating cows were tested in an obstacle course in the light lab. A dark environment did not limit the cows’ ability to walk through the obstacle course, but they reduced walking speed when subjected to non-uniform, low-intensity red light, indicating the importance of avoiding non-uniform light in dairy barns. Quantification of light environments on four Swedish dairy farms, using a range of measuring methods, showed that the light environment differed between farms, but that light of low intensity and uniformity was commonly used. Light environment is important for dairy cows, as it can affect their physiology and behavior. The light environment can be more objectively described using multiple measuring methods.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.