BackgroundCOPD patients have high pulmonary and systemic oxidative stress that correlates with severity of disease. Sulforaphane has been shown to induce expression of antioxidant genes via activation of a transcription factor, nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor 2 (Nrf2).MethodsThis parallel, placebo-controlled, phase 2, randomized trial was conducted at three US academic medical centers. Patients who met GOLD criteria for COPD and were able to tolerate bronchoscopies were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive placebo, 25 μmoles, or 150 μmoles sulforaphane daily by mouth for four weeks. The primary outcomes were changes in Nrf2 target gene expression (NQ01, HO1, AKR1C1 and AKR1C3) in alveolar macrophages and bronchial epithelial cells. Secondary outcomes included measures of oxidative stress and airway inflammation, and pulmonary function tests.ResultsBetween July 2011 and May 2013, 89 patients were enrolled and randomized. Sulforaphane was absorbed in the patients as evident from their plasma metabolite levels. Changes in Nrf2 target gene expression relative to baseline ranged from 0.79 to 1.45 and there was no consistent pattern among the three groups; the changes were not statistically significantly different from baseline. Changes in measures of inflammation and pulmonary function tests were not different among the groups. Sulforaphane was well tolerated at both dose levels.ConclusionSulforaphane administered for four weeks at doses of 25 μmoles and 150 μmoles to patients with COPD did not stimulate the expression of Nrf2 target genes or have an effect on levels of other anti-oxidants or markers of inflammation.Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT01335971.

IMPORTANCE Soy isoflavone supplements are used to treat several chronic diseases, although the data supporting their use are limited. Some data suggest that supplementation with soy isoflavone may be an effective treatment for patients with poor asthma control.OBJECTIVE To determine whether a soy isoflavone supplement improves asthma control in adolescent and adult patients with poorly controlled disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted between May 2010 and August 2012 at 19 adult and pediatric pulmonary and allergy centers in the American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers network. Three hundred eighty-six adults and children aged 12 years or older with symptomatic asthma while taking a controller medicine and low dietary soy intake were randomized, and 345 (89%) completed spirometry at week 24.INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomly assigned to receive soy isoflavone supplement containing 100 mg of total isoflavones (n=193) or matching placebo (n=193) in 2 divided doses administered daily for 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary outcome measure was change in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV 1 ) at 24 weeks. Secondary outcome measures were symptoms, episodes of poor asthma control, Asthma Control Test score (range, 5-25; higher scores indicate better control), and systemic and airway biomarkers of inflammation.RESULTS Mean changes in prebronchodilator FEV 1 over 24 weeks were 0.03 L (95% CI, −0.01 to 0.08 L) in the placebo group and 0.01 L (95% CI, −0.07 to 0.07 L) in the soy isoflavone group, which were not significantly different (P = .36). Mean changes in symptom scores on the Asthma Control Test (placebo, 1.98 [95% CI,] vs soy isoflavones, 2.20 [95% CI, 1.53-2.87]; positive values indicate a reduction in symptoms), number of episodes of poor asthma control (placebo, 3.3 [95% CI, 2.7-4.1] vs soy isoflavones, 3.0 [95% CI, 2.4-3.7]), and changes in exhaled nitric oxide (placebo, −3.48 ppb [95% CI, −5.99 to −0.97 ppb] vs soy isoflavones, 1.39 ppb [95% CI, −1.73 to 4.51 ppb]) did not significantly improve more with the soy isoflavone supplement than with placebo. Mean plasma genistein level increased from 4.87 ng/mL to 37.67 ng/mL (P < .001) in participants receiving the supplement.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among adults and children aged 12 years or older with poorly controlled asthma while taking a controller medication, use of a soy isoflavone supplement, compared with placebo, did not result in improved lung function or clinical outcomes. These findings suggest that this supplement should not be used for patients with poorly controlled asthma.

Background Chronic sinonasal disease is common in asthma and associated with poor asthma control; however there are no long term trials addressing whether chronic treatment of sinonasal disease improves asthma control. Objective To determine if treatment of chronic sinonasal disease with nasal corticosteroids improves asthma control as measured by the Childhood Asthma Control Test (cACT) and Asthma Control Test (ACT) in children and adults respectively. Methods A 24 week multi-center randomized placebo controlled double-blinded trial of placebo versus nasal mometasone in adults and children with inadequately controlled asthma. Treatments were randomly assigned with concealment of allocation. Results 237 adults and 151 children were randomized to nasal mometasone versus placebo, 319 participants completed the study. There was no difference in the cACT (difference in change with mometasone – change with placebo [ΔM - ΔP]: -0.38, CI: -2.19 to 1.44, p = 0.68 ages 6 to 11) or the ACT (ΔM - ΔP: 0.51, CI: -0.46 to 1.48, p = 0.30, ages 12 and older) in those assigned to mometasone versus placebo. In children and adolescents, ages 6 to 17, there was no difference in asthma or sinus symptoms, but a decrease in episodes of poorly controlled asthma defined by a drop in peak flow. In adults there was a small difference in asthma symptoms measured by the Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ΔM - ΔP: 0.06, CI: 0.01 to 0.11, p <0.01) and in nasal symptoms (sinus symptom score ΔM - ΔP: -3.82, CI: -7.19 to- 0.45, p =0.03), but no difference in asthma quality of life, lung function or episodes of poorly controlled asthma in adults assigned to mometasone versus placebo. Conclusions Treatment of chronic sinonasal disease with nasal corticosteroids for 24 weeks does not improve asthma control. Treatment of sinonasal disease in asthma should be determined by the need to treat sinonasal disease rather than to improve asthma control.

Bivalirudin was effective and well-tolerated in these patients. Further studies should be conducted to better define safety and efficacy of bivalirudin in pediatric patients.

No abstract