Type I and III interferons (IFNs) activate similar downstream signaling cascades, but unlike type I IFNs, type III IFNs (IFNl) do not elicit strong inflammatory responses in vivo. Here, we examined the molecular mechanisms underlying this disparity. Type I and III IFNs displayed kinetic differences in expression of IFN-stimulated genes and proinflammatory responses, with type I IFNs preferentially stimulating expression of the transcription factor IRF1. Type III IFNs failed to induce IRF1 expression because of low IFNl receptor abundance and insufficient STAT1 activation on epithelial cells and thus did not activate the IRF1 proinflammatory gene program. Rather, IFNl stimulation preferentially induced factors implicated in tissue repair. Our findings suggest that IFN receptor compartmentalization and abundance confer a spatiotemporal division of labor where type III IFNs control viral spread at the site of the infection while restricting tissue damage; the transient induction of inflammatory responses by type I IFNs recruits immune effectors to promote protective immunity.

No abstract

Many host RNA sensors are positioned in the cytosol to detect viral RNA during infection. However, most positive-strand RNA viruses replicate within a modified organelle co-opted from intracellular membranes of the endomembrane system, which shields viral products from cellular innate immune sensors. Targeting innate RNA sensors to the endomembrane system may enhance their ability to sense RNA generated by viruses that use these compartments for replication. Here, we reveal that an isoform of oligoadenylate synthetase 1, OAS1 p46, is prenylated and targeted to the endomembrane system. Membrane localization of OAS1 p46 confers enhanced access to viral replication sites and results in increased antiviral activity against a subset of RNA viruses including flaviviruses, picornaviruses, and SARS-CoV-2. Finally, our human genetic analysis shows that the OAS1 splice-site SNP responsible for production of the OAS1 p46 isoform correlates with protection from severe COVID-19. This study highlights the importance of endomembrane targeting for the antiviral specificity of OAS1 and suggests that early control of SARS-CoV-2 replication through OAS1-p46 is an important determinant of COVID-19 severity.

SUMMARYMany host RNA sensors are positioned in the cytosol to detect viral RNA during infection. However, most positive-strand RNA viruses replicate within a modified organelle co-opted from intracellular membranes of the endomembrane system, which shields viral products from host cell innate immune sensors. Targeting innate RNA sensors to the endomembrane system may enhance their ability to sense viral RNA generated by viruses that use these compartments for replication. Here, we reveal that an isoform of oligoadenylate synthetase 1, OAS1 p46, is prenylated and targeted to the endomembrane system. Membrane localization of OAS1 p46 confers enhanced access to viral replication sites and results in increased antiviral activity against a subset of RNA viruses including flavivirus, picornavirus, and SARS-CoV-2. Finally, our human genetic analysis shows that the OAS1 splice-site SNP responsible for production of the OAS1 p46 isoform strongly associates with COVID-19 severity. This study highlights the importance of endomembrane targeting for the antiviral specificity of OAS1 and suggests early control of SARS-CoV-2 replication through OAS1-p46 is an important determinant of COVID-19 severity.

No abstract

The goal of the proposed research is to determine how the interferon regulatory factor 5(IRF5) lupus risk variant translates into biological risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Genome wide association studies (GWAS) have identified IRF5 as one of the most strongly associated genes with susceptibility to SLE. Although the genetic association of IRF5 with lupus is clear, the exact mechanism by which IRF5 risk variant promotes susceptibility for lupus is still unknown. We are investigating negative regulatory factors of IRF5 activity under normal conditions, which are unable to regulate IRF5 exon 6 risk variants thereby activating type I IFNs leading to aberrant immune activation. We have characterized IRF5 exon 6 variants in pDCs using molecular and biochemical approaches, and investigated the effect of negative regulators on IRF5 exon 6 variants. This will be a significant step to gain the mechanistic understanding of aberrant production type I IFNs and immune activation in lupus.