This study aims to determine research trends regarding previous Islamic letters of credit, assess research collaboration relationships, and identify future research directions. Using 42 articles published between 2013-2020 on Islamic Letter of Credit. Using qualitative and quantitative approaches, namely Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methods. This research uses Vos Viewers software. It is known that the three sub-themes that dominate research related to Islamic Letter of Credit are: Islamic Banking and Letter of Credit, Bank Regulation, and Business Financing. This study implies that there is still little research on Islamic Letters of Credit. It is hoped that Islamic Letters of Credit literature can adjust or find new methods that are suitable and accurate.
This study aims to determine sentiment towards Islamic insurance in the last 16 years, from 2006 to 2022. The method used is descriptive statistical analysis combined with meta-analysis and sentiment from secondary data in metadata from 100 journals taken from Dimension, then processed using Microsoft Excel 2016 and SentiStrength software. The results of the sentiment analysis show that expert opinions on the development of Islamic insurance vary, with positive sentiments of 37%, negative sentiments of 34%, and neutral sentiments of 29%. Based on the results of the study, it was found that there had been researched on the topic of Islamic insurance in the scientific literature. From the results of this study, it can be seen that there are differences of opinion among some scholars regarding Islamic insurance with the results of the impact of Islamic insurance itself. So, there is a need for cooperation between scholars and Islamic insurance experts to determine the law of Islamic insurance itself. This is complemented by the dissemination of literacy regarding Islamic insurance and its impact on individuals and the country, to increase public awareness of the importance of choosing Islamic insurance by Islamic law to avoid sins and loss of property.
The purpose of this study is to identify attitudes about ZISWAF throughout the previous five years, from 2019 to 2023, and to determine whether or not moral hazard can exist at ZISWAF institutions. The technique involves using SentiStrength and Microsoft Excel 2019 to analyse secondary data in metadata from 149 journals collected from Dimensions, together with descriptive statistical analysis, meta-analysis, and sentiment analysis. The sentiment analysis's findings demonstrate the perspectives of ZISWAF researchers, with neutral sentiments representing for 41%, positive sentiments for 32%, and negative sentiments for 26%. ZISWAF-related research reveals a positive attitude since people are still optimistic about this financial instrument's potential to solve social issues. The fact that ZISWAF fund management still operates on a manual method, which is susceptible to moral hazard and human error, the ineffectiveness of ZISWAF management, and the lack of a supervisory institution for ZISWAF fund management all contributed to the unfavourable sentiment that was discovered in the research regarding to ZISWAF. As a further practical application, this study makes recommendations to regulators, academics, and the ZISWAF Institution.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.