Objectives:
The aim of the study was (1) to evaluate continuation rates of vaginal ring pessary for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and (2) to identify predictors for continued pessary use.
Methods:
This retrospective chart review study was conducted in a tertiary center. Women who had a ring with support pessary successfully fitted between January 2009 and December 2013 and had completed up to 3 years of follow-up care were included in the analysis. Demographic and obstetric data, body weight, pelvic organ prolapse stage, and associated symptoms were evaluated. All the women were followed until February 28, 2017, unless surgery to correct POP surgery was required, pessary use was discontinued, or the women died.
Results:
A total of 289 women with symptomatic POP (stages II, III, and IV) were evaluated. The median age was 71 years (range 34-83 y), and the median parity was 3 (range 0-8). Among the women with a successful initial fitting, the failure rate was 5.88% (17/289) at 6 months with most of these women choosing to have surgical intervention. This analysis indicates that the probability of the successful continuation of pessary use after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years was 83.0%, 78.2%, 71.3%, 65.3%, and 61.7%, respectively, reported using a Kaplan–Meier plot. The main cause for discontinuation of pessary use before 3 years was the election for surgical intervention. With regard to predictors for continued pessary use, self-care was the only factor that influenced compliance rates after treatment of 3 years.
Conclusion:
A ring with support pessary can be used successfully to alleviate symptoms of advanced stage prolapse for 3 years or longer. In addition, proper self-management was found to be a strong predictor for prolonged pessary use.
Background
Pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) is a first-line treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), but adherence to PFME is often problematic. The aim of this study was to better understand the attitudes and barriers to practicing pelvic floor muscle exercise among women with SUI.
Methods
We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was used to approach eligible participants. The interview included questions focused on women’s perceptions regarding SUI and PFME, sources of information, support, and barriers and motivators of PFME. In-depth interviews were conducted until data saturation occurred. After several readings of written interview transcripts, codes were retrieved, and thematic analysis was conducted.
Results
Seven women participated in the study (average age 53.2 years), and most (4/7) were retired. Three salient themes emerged from the data: (1) perception of SUI, (2) barriers to PFME, and (3) motivators to exercise. Participants highlighted various barriers to PFME: (1) lack of self-discipline owing to both intrinsic and extrinsic factors, (2) lack of confidence in how to perform the exercises properly, and (3) skepticism regarding the efficacy of treatment according to women’s direct and indirect experiences. Achievement of desired outcomes, symptom severity, women’s expectations, and fear of surgery were motivators to regularly perform PFME.
Conclusions
The main barriers to regular PFME were inadequate self-discipline, knowledge, and confidence in performing the exercises, and a poor perception about the effectiveness of PFME.
Anorectal dysfunction was prevalent among women with urinary incontinence; age and number of parity were the risk factors. All women with symptoms of urinary incontinence should be evaluated about anorectal symptoms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.