Introduction Prone position is known to improve mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The impact of prone position in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) remains to be determined. In this review, we describe the mechanisms of action of prone position, systematically appraise the current experience of prone position in COVID-19 patients, and highlight unique considerations for prone position practices during this pandemic. Methods For our systematic review, we searched PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE from January 1, 2020, to April 16, 2020. After completion of our search, we became aware of four relevant publications during article preparation that were published in May and June 2020, and these studies were reviewed for eligibility and inclusion. We included all studies reporting clinical characteristics of patients admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 disease who received respiratory support with high-flow nasal cannula, or noninvasive or mechanical ventilation and reported the use of prone position. The full text of eligible articles was reviewed, and data regarding study design, patient characteristics, interventions and outcomes were extracted. Results We found seven studies (total 1899 patients) describing prone position in COVID-19. Prone position has been increasingly used in non-intubated patients with COVID-19; studies show high tolerance and improvement in oxygenation and lung recruitment. Published studies lacked a description of important clinical outcomes (e.g., mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation). Conclusions Based on the findings of our review, we recommend prone position in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 ARDS as per existing guidelines. A trial of prone position should be considered for non-intubated COVID-19 patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, as long as this does not result in a delay in intubation.

No abstract

The objectives of this review are to describe the limitations of commonly used clinical outcomes [e.g., mortality, ventilation parameters, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS)] in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) studies; and to explore other pertinent clinical outcomes that pediatric critical care practitioners should consider in future clinical practice and research studies. These include long-term pulmonary function, risk of pulmonary hypertension (PHT), nutrition status and growth, PICU-acquired weakness, neurological outcomes and neurocognitive development, functional status, health-related quality of life (HRQOL)], health-care costs, caregiver and family stress. PubMed was searched using the following keywords or

Introduction: With improving mortality rates in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS), functional outcomes in survivors are increasingly important. We aim to describe the change in functional status score (FSS) from baseline to discharge and to identify risk factors associated with poor functional outcomes.Methods: We examined clinical records of patients with PARDS admitted to our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) from 2009 to 2016. Our primary outcome was acquired morbidity at PICU and hospital discharge (defined by an increase in FSS ≥3 points above baseline). We included severity of illness scores and severity of PARDS in our bivariate analysis for risk factors for acquired morbidity.Results: There were 181 patients with PARDS, of which 90 (49.7%) survived.Median pediatric index of mortality 2 score was 4.05 (1.22, 8.70) and 21 (23.3%) survivors had severe PARDS. A total of 59 (65.6%) and 14 (15.6%) patients had acquired morbidity at PICU and hospital discharge, respectively. Median baseline FSS was 6.00 (6.00, 6.25), which increased to 11.00 (8.75, 12.00) at PICU discharge before decreasing to 7.50 (6.00, 9.25) at hospital discharge. All patients had significantly higher FSS at both PICU and hospital discharge median compared to baseline. Feeding and respiratory were the most affected domains. After adjusting for severity of illness, severity categories of PARDS were not a risk factor for acquired morbidity.Conclusion: Acquired morbidity in respiratory and feeding domains was common in PARDS survivors. Specific attention should be given to these two domains of functional outcomes in these children.

BackgroundTuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the world. Each case represents ongoing transmission and has a significant public health burden. We aim to examine the clinical profile of paediatric TB and compare pulmonary TB (PTB) with extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) in Singapore.MethodsA retrospective study of patients admitted to KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore from January 2008 to September 2017 with active TB was undertaken. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with PTB and EPTB were compared.ResultsSeventy-five patients were diagnosed as having active TB (49 (65%) with PTB and 26 (35%) with EPTB). Patients with EPTB were more likely than those with PTB to be younger (median age 5.1 (IQR 1.2–10.2) years vs 10.1 (IQR 3.5–13.5) years), immunodeficient (35% vs 6%), with a lower haemoglobin count (median 11.2 (IQR 10.2–11.9) g/dL vs 12.0 (IQR 10.5–13.9) g/dL), lower recovery rate (27% vs 57%) and required longer duration of treatment (median 12 (IQR 9–12) months vs 6 (IQR 6–9) months). Common clinical presentations of both PTB and EPTB were significant fever (27%), cough (33%) and weight loss (32%). Overall mortality was 8% with septic shock responsible for three of the six deaths.ConclusionEPTB is more common in the younger age group and is associated with a lower recovery rate.

Background. Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity globally. Pediatric patients are more likely to develop severe disease. Abdominal TB is a rare manifestation of pediatric TB and can present with chronic and nonspecific abdominal symptoms. This study examines the clinical profile of pediatric patients with abdominal TB and treatment outcomes. Method. A retrospective study of patients admitted to a tertiary pediatric hospital in Singapore over 10 years. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were examined. Results. There were 3 male and 3 female patients with mean age of 11.3 years. Household contacts were traced in 3 cases. The most common presenting symptoms were fever, weight loss, and abdominal symptoms such as diarrhea, vomiting, and loss of appetite. Inflammatory markers were raised with mean C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation (ESR) rate at 70.9 mg/L and 90 mm/h respectively. Abdominal imaging showed abnormalities such as splenic foci and thickened bowel wall with significant intraabdominal lymphadenopathy. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was isolated from stool, rectal swabs and intra-adominal specimens. Two patients underwent excisional biopsy of lymph node to obtain diagnosis. Two patients required emergency laparotomy and 1 patient received esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy. Four out of the 6 patients had pulmonary involvement. Conclusion. Abdominal TB should be a differential diagnosis in children with chronic abdominal symptoms for at least 8 weeks with anemia, raised ESR and CRP. The gold standard for diagnosis still remains as positive microbiological culture. However, abdominal imaging studies are also vital in obtaining further supportive evidence for chronic infection.

Palliative care (PC) is an integral component of optimal critical care (CC) practice for pediatric patients facing life-threatening illness. PC acts as an additional resource for patients and families as they navigate through critical illness. Although PC encompasses end of life care, it is most effective when integrated early alongside disease-directed and curative therapies. PC primarily focuses on improving quality of life for patients and families by anticipating, preventing and treating suffering throughout the continuum of illness. This includes addressing symptom distress and facilitating communication. Effective communication is vital to elicit value-based goals of care, and to guide parents through patient-focused and potentially difficult decision-making process which includes advanced care planning. A multidisciplinary approach is most favorable when providing support to both patient and family, whether it is from the psychosocial, practical, emotional, spiritual or cultural aspects. PC also ensures coordination and continuity of care across different care settings. Support for family carries on after death with grief and bereavement support. This narrative review aims to appraise the current evidence of integration of PC into pediatric CC and its impact on patient- and family-centered outcomes. We will also summarize the impact of integration of good PC into pediatric CC, including effective communication with families, advanced care planning, withholding or withdrawal of life sustaining measures and bereavement support. Finally, we will provide a framework on how best to integrate PC in PICU. These findings will provide insights on how PC can improve the quality of care of a critically ill child.

We report a case of an infant who had presented with fever and an acral-accentuated rash, for which his cerebrospinal fluid returned positive for parechovirus. He was treated symptomatically and discharged well, with no long-term complications.