This paper provides the results of a comprehensive comparison between complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) amplifiers with low susceptibility to electromagnetic interference (EMI). They represent the state-of-the-art in low EMI susceptibility design. An exhaustive scenario for EMI pollution has been considered: the injected interference can indeed directly reach the amplifier pins or can be coupled from the printed circuit board (PCB) ground. This is also a key point for evaluating the susceptibility from EMI coupled to the output pin. All of the amplifiers are re-designed in a United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) 180 nm CMOS process in order to have a fair comparison. The topologies investigated and compared are basically derived from the Miller and the folded cascode ones, which are well-known and widely used by CMOS analog designers.
In this paper the CMOS amplifier behaviour has been further investigated respect to the previous works in the literature. An exhaustive scenario for the EMI pollution has been considered: the injected interferences can indeed directly reach the amplifier pins or can be coupled from
the PCB ground. This is a key point for evaluating also the susceptibility from the EMI coupled to the output pin, which is disclosed as a critical point. The investigated topologies are basically derived from the Miller and the Folded Cascode, which are well-known and widely used by the CMOS
analog designers; all of them are re-designed in UMC 180 nm CMOS process in order to have a fair comparison.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.