No abstract

We aimed at determining whether any association exists between genetic polymorphisms in epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1), NADPH-quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1), glutathione S-transferases (GSTM1/P1/T1) and individual susceptibility to breast cancer. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism-based genotyping assays were used to determine the frequency of polymorphisms in EPHX1 (exons 3 and 4), NQO1 (exon 6), GSTM1 (deletion), GSTP1 (exon 5), and GSTT1 (deletion) in a case -control study comprised of 238 patients with breast cancer and 313 healthy individuals. The distribution of genotypes in exon 6 of NQO1 was significantly different between the control group and breast cancer cases. Age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) for variant genotype NQO1*2/*2 was 3.68 (confidence interval (CI) ¼ 1.41 -9.62, P ¼ 0.008). Association of GSTP1*2/*2 genotype as well as that of low EPHX1 activity deduced by combinations of genotypes in exons 3 and 4 with breast cancer was suggestive, but nonsignificant. Individuals simultaneously lacking GSTM1 and carrying at least one GSTP1 variant allele were at significantly higher risk of breast cancer (OR ¼ 2.03, CI ¼ 1.18 -3.50, P ¼ 0.010). Combinations of either GSTM1null or GSTP1*2 with low activity of EPHX1 presented significant risk of breast cancer (OR ¼ 1.88, CI ¼ 1.00 -3.52, P ¼ 0.049 and OR ¼ 2.40, CI ¼ 1.15 -5.00, P ¼ 0.019, respectively) as well. In conclusion, the results suggest that genetic polymorphisms in biotransformation enzymes may play a significant role in the development of breast cancer.

No abstract

The question of susceptibility to squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) in the environmental context was addressed by analysis of functional polymorphisms in enzymes metabolizing smoke constituents and/or alcohol (CYP2A13, CYP1B1, EPHX1, NQO1, GSTM1, GSTP1, GSTT1, ADH1B and ADH1C). Case-control study of 122 age- and sex-matched pairs of subjects was performed using so far unexplored Central European Slavic population with high level of tobacco and alcohol abuse. Age-, gender-, smoking- and alcohol-adjusted logistic regression failed to demonstrate any significant association of the analyzed polymorphisms with the SCCHN risk. When interactions between potential modifiers of effect, i.e. smoking and alcohol were tested, drinkers seemed to be at lower risk than nondrinkers when carrying the heterozygous genotype Ile/Val in codon 432 of CYP1B1 (OR=0.42; 95% CI=0.21-0.83; p=0.013 vs. OR=1.02; 95% CI=0.34-2.94; p=0.977). Similarly, drinkers were at lower risk than nondrinkers when carrying the heterozygous genotype Pro/Ser in codon 187 of NQO1 (OR=0.41; 95% CI=0.19-0.88; p=0.022 vs. OR=0.96; 95% CI=0.29-3.12; p=0.948). More interestingly, drinkers carrying the rare homozygous genotype Val/Val in codon 350 of ADH1C were at significantly higher risk than nondrinkers carrying this genotype (OR=4.01; 95% CI=1.61-10.01; p=0.003 vs. OR=0.93; 95% CI=0.25-3.57; p=0.919). This result confirmed findings of previously published studies. Smoking did not significantly modify the effect of genotypes. Our data thus demonstrate that genetic susceptibility to SCCHN shall be further followed on populations with different genetic background and lifestyle.

No abstract