No abstract

During photosynthesis, two photoreaction centers located in the thylakoid membranes of the chloroplast, photosystems I and II (PSI and PSII), use light energy to mobilize electrons to generate ATP and NADPH. Different modes of electron flow exist, of which the linear electron flow is driven by PSI and PSII, generating ATP and NADPH, whereas the cyclic electron flow (CEF) only generates ATP and is driven by the PSI alone. Different environmental and metabolic conditions require the adjustment of ATP/NADPH ratios and a switch of electron distribution between the two photosystems. With the exception of PGR5, other components facilitating CEF are unknown. Here, we report the identification of PGRL1, a transmembrane protein present in thylakoids of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plants lacking PGRL1 show perturbation of CEF, similar to PGR5-deficient plants. We find that PGRL1 and PGR5 interact physically and associate with PSI. We therefore propose that the PGRL1-PGR5 complex facilitates CEF in eukaryotes.

To cope with growth in low-phosphate (Pi) soils, plants have evolved adaptive responses that involve both developmental and metabolic changes. PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE 1 (PHR1) and related transcription factors play a central role in the control of Pi starvation responses (PSRs). How Pi levels control PHR1 activity, and thus PSRs, remains to be elucidated. Here, we identify a direct Pi-dependent inhibitor of PHR1 in Arabidopsis, SPX1, a nuclear protein that shares the SPX domain with yeast Pi sensors and with several Pi starvation signaling proteins from plants. Double mutation of SPX1 and of a related gene, SPX2, resulted in molecular and physiological changes indicative of increased PHR1 activity in plants grown in Pi-sufficient conditions or after Pi refeeding of Pi-starved plants but had only a limited effect on PHR1 activity in Pi-starved plants. These data indicate that SPX1 and SPX2 have a cellular Pi-dependent inhibitory effect on PHR1. Coimmunoprecipitation assays showed that the SPX1/PHR1 interaction in planta is highly Pi-dependent. DNA-binding and pull-down assays with bacterially expressed, affinity-purified tagged SPX1 and ΔPHR1 proteins showed that SPX1 is a competitive inhibitor of PHR1 binding to its recognition sequence, and that its efficiency is highly dependent on the presence of Pi or phosphite, a nonmetabolizable Pi analog that can repress PSRs. The relative strength of the SPX1/PHR1 interaction is thus directly influenced by Pi, providing a link between Pi perception and signaling.phosphate sensor | phosphate starvation signaling S ince the beginning of molecular genetics, phosphate (Pi) starvation rescue systems, especially the Pi starvation rescues systems of bacteria and yeast, have served as emblematic models for studies of regulation of gene activity. In plants, these systems have gained additional interest because of the complexity and multicellular nature of plants (1, 2), and especially due to their potential for improving Pi acquisition and use in crops, a major goal toward sustainable agriculture. Considerable information has been gathered in the past decade on the components of the Pi starvation signaling pathway (reviewed in refs. 3-6). Major findings in plants include (i) identification of PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE 1 (PHR1) and related transcription factors as master regulators of Pi starvation responses (PSRs) (7-11); (ii) demonstration of the involvement of ubiquitin system components, including PHO2 and NLA, in Pi signaling (12-16); (iii) identification of miRNAs as mobile signals in Pi homeostasis (17, 18); and (iv) identification of Pi starvation-induced (PSI) riboregulators of miRNA activity, based on target mimicry (19) and natural antisense RNA that activates translation of PHO1 mRNA (20). In addition, a singular characteristic of nutrient starvation responses in plants is that several of these responses are at long distance, systemically controlled by plant shoot nutrient status, whereas others are controlled by local nutrient concentration. Transcriptomic a...

Developmental or metabolic changes in chloroplasts can have profound effects on the rest of the plant cell. Such intracellular responses are associated with signals that originate in chloroplasts and convey information on their physiological status to the nucleus, which leads to large-scale changes in gene expression (retrograde signaling). A screen designed to identify components of retrograde signaling resulted in the discovery of the so-called genomes uncoupled (gun) mutants. Genetic evidence suggests that the chloroplast protein GUN1 integrates signals derived from perturbations in plastid redox state, plastid gene expression, and tetrapyrrole biosynthesis (TPB) in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) seedlings, exerting biogenic control of chloroplast functions. However, the molecular mechanism by which GUN1 integrates retrograde signaling in the chloroplast is unclear. Here we show that GUN1 also operates in adult plants, contributing to operational control of chloroplasts. The gun1 mutation genetically interacts with mutations of genes for the chloroplast ribosomal proteins S1 (PRPS1) and L11. Analysis of gun1 prps1 lines indicates that GUN1 controls PRPS1 accumulation at the protein level. The GUN1 protein physically interacts with proteins involved in chloroplast protein homeostasis based on coimmunoprecipitation experiments. Furthermore, yeast two-hybrid and bimolecular fluorescence complementation experiments suggest that GUN1 might transiently interact with several TPB enzymes, including Mg-chelatase subunit D (CHLD) and two other TPB enzymes known to activate retrograde signaling. Moreover, the association of PRPS1 and CHLD with protein complexes is modulated by GUN1. These findings allow us to speculate that retrograde signaling might involve GUN1-dependent formation of protein complexes.Developmental or metabolic changes in chloroplasts can have profound effects on the rest of the plant cell. Such intracellular responses are associated with signals that originate in chloroplasts and convey information

SUMMARYUpon hormonal signaling, ovules develop as lateral organs from the placenta. Ovule numbers ultimately determine the number of seeds that develop, and thereby contribute to the final seed yield in crop plants. We demonstrate here that CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON 1 (CUC1), CUC2 and AINTEGUMENTA (ANT) have additive effects on ovule primordia formation. We show that expression of the CUC1 and CUC2 genes is required to redundantly regulate expression of PINFORMED1 (PIN1), which in turn is required for ovule primordia formation. Furthermore, our results suggest that the auxin response factor MONOPTEROS (MP/ARF5) may directly bind ANT, CUC1 and CUC2 and promote their transcription. Based on our findings, we propose an integrative model to describe the molecular mechanisms of the early stages of ovule development.

In Arabidopsis thaliana and many other plant species, ovules arise from carpel tissue as new meristematic formations. Cell fate in proliferating ovule primordia is specified by particular ovule identity factors, such as the homeodomain factor BELL1 (BEL1) and MADS box family members SEEDSTICK (STK), SHATTERPROOF1 (SHP1), SHP2, and AGAMOUS. Both in the bel1 mutant and the stk shp1 shp2 triple mutant, integuments are transformed into carpelloid structures. Combining these mutants in a bel1 stk shp1 shp2 quadruple mutant, we showed that the bel1 phenotype is significantly enhanced. We also demonstrate that ovule differentiation requires the regulation of the stem cell maintenance gene WUSCHEL, repression of which is predominantly maintained by BEL1 during ovule development. Based on yeast three-hybrid assays and genetic data, we show that BEL1 interacts with the ovule identity MADS box factors when they dimerize with SEPALLATA proteins. We propose a model for ovule development that explains how the balance between carpel identity activity and ovule identity activity is established by a MADS box homeodomain protein complex.

Based on their evolutionary origin, MADS box transcription factor genes have been divided into two classes, namely, type I and II. The plant-specific type II MIKC MADS box genes have been most intensively studied and shown to be key regulators of developmental processes, such as meristem identity, flowering time, and fruit and seed development. By contrast, very little is known about type I MADS domain transcription factors, and they have not attracted interest for a long time. A number of recent studies have now indicated a key regulatory role for type I MADS box factors in plant reproduction, in particular in specifying female gametophyte, embryo, and endosperm development. These analyses have also suggested that type I MADS box factors are decisive for setting reproductive boundaries between species. MADS DOMAIN ENCODING GENESMADS box genes are of ancient origin and are found in animals, fungi, and plants. All identified MADS box genes encode a highly conserved N-terminal DNA binding domain 55 to 60 amino acids in length named the MADS domain ( Figure 1; Trö bner et al., 1992). Homology searches in the nonredundant microbial database using a Hidden Markov Model for seed alignment of the MADS domain suggested that the MADS domain originates from the DNA binding subunit A of topoisomerases IIA subunit A (Gramzow et al., 2010).The acronym MADS ) is derived from the initials of MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE1 (MCM1, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Passmore et al., 1988), AGAMOUS (Arabidopsis thaliana; Yanofsky et al., 1990), DEFI-CIENS (Antirrhinum majus; Sommer et al., 1990), and SERUM RESPONSE FACTOR (SRF, Homo sapiens; Norman et al., 1988). These members of the MADS box gene family play important biological roles; for example, the human SRF coordinates the transcription of the proto-oncogene c-fos (Masutani et al., 1997;Mo et al., 2001), while MCM1 is central to the transcriptional control of cell type-specific genes and the pheromone response in the yeast S. cerevisiae (Shore and Sharrocks, 1995;Mead et al., 2002).Plant MADS box genes were first identified as regulators of floral organ identity and have since been reported to control additional developmental processes, such as the determination of meristem identity of vegetative, inflorescence, and floral meristems, root growth, ovule and female gametophyte development, flowering time, fruit ripening, and dehiscence (Zhang and Forde, 1998;Ng and Yanofsky, 2001;Giovannoni, 2004;Whipple et al., 2004;Liu et al., 2009). Studies using several model species, including Arabidopsis, A. majus, Petunia hybrida, Zea mays, and Oryza sativa, have revealed that many of these functions are conserved among angiosperms (Schwarz-Sommer et al., 2003;Vandenbussche et al., 2003;Kater et al., 2006). ARABIDOPSIS MADS BOX TYPE I AND TYPE II: AN EVOLUTIONARY OVERVIEWBased on sequence conservation in the MADS domain, these transcription factors can be grouped into two main lineages, named type I (SRF-like) and type II (MEF2-like; Alvarez-Buylla et al., 2000). In animals, type I genes are involv...

(G.F., M.M.A.) MADS box transcription factors controlling flower development have been isolated and studied in a wide variety of organisms. These studies have shown that homologous MADS box genes from different species often have similar functions. OsMADS18 from rice (Oryza sativa) belongs to the phylogenetically defined AP1/SQUA group. The MADS box genes of this group have functions in plant development, like controlling the transition from vegetative to reproductive growth, determination of floral organ identity, and regulation of fruit maturation. In this paper we report the functional analysis of OsMADS18. This rice MADS box gene is widely expressed in rice with its transcripts accumulated to higher levels in meristems. Overexpression of OsMADS18 in rice induced early flowering, and detailed histological analysis revealed that the formation of axillary shoot meristems was accelerated. Silencing of OsMADS18 using an RNA interference approach did not result in any visible phenotypic alteration, indicating that OsMADS18 is probably redundant with other MADS box transcription factors. Surprisingly, overexpression of OsMADS18 in Arabidopsis caused a phenotype closely resembling the ap1 mutant. We show that the ap1 phenotype is not caused by down-regulation of AP1 expression. Yeast two-hybrid experiments showed that some of the natural partners of AP1 interact with OsMADS18, suggesting that the OsMADS18 overexpression phenotype in Arabidopsis is likely to be due to the subtraction of AP1 partners from active transcription complexes. Thus, when compared to AP1, OsMADS18 during evolution seems to have conserved the mechanistic properties of protein-protein interactions, although it cannot complement the AP1 function.