Although conventional Raman, surface‐enhanced Raman (SERS) and tip‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS) have been known for a long time, a direct, thorough comparison of these three methods has never been carried out. In this paper, spectra that were obtained by conventional Raman, SERS (on gold and silver substrates) and TERS (in ‘gap mode’ with silver tips and gold substrates) are compared to learn from their differences and similarities. Because the investigation of biological samples by TERS has recently become a hot topic, this work focuses on biologically relevant substances. Starting from the TER spectra of bovine serum albumin as an example for a protein, the dipeptides Phe–Phe and Tyr–Tyr and the tripeptide Tyr–Tyr–Tyr were investigated. The major findings were as follows. (1) We show that the widely used assumption that spectral bands do not shift when comparing SER, TER and conventional Raman spectra (except due to binding to the metal surface in SERS or TERS) is valid. However, band intensity ratios can differ significantly between these three methods. (2) Marker bands can be assigned, which should allow one to identify and localize proteins in complex biological environments in future investigations. From our results, general guidelines for the interpretation of TER spectra are proposed. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy is a surface sensitive analytical method that combines the advantages of scanning probe microscopy and Raman spectroscopy. It holds great promises for imaging of biological samples with high spatial resolution (10−50 nm), well below the optical diffraction limit. It offers the opportunity to directly localize and identify proteins and their conformation in a complex (e.g., native) environment. Tip-enhanced Raman (TER) spectra in the socalled "gap-mode" configuration with a metal tip in scanning tunnelling feedback with a metal substrate coated with different proteins (bovine serum albumin, immunoglobulin G, trypsin, and β-lactoglobulin) as well as of model octapeptides (with and without an aromatic amino acid residue) are presented. The goal was to determine if it is possible to reliably assign marker bands for proteins and if different secondary structures of proteins can be distinguished in their gap-mode TER spectra as reliably as by IR and conventional Raman spectroscopy. It is shown that contrary to the presented conventional Raman spectra of proteins the amide I mode, which is widely used to identify secondary structure motifs of proteins, is not visible in gap-mode TERS. Aromatic modes are prominent and can be used as reliable marker bands for imaging of proteins in a complex environment.

Non-covalent interactions are essential for the structural organization of biomacromolecules and play an important role in molecular recognition processes, such as the interactions between proteins, glycans, lipids, DNA, and RNA. Mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful tool for studying of non-covalent interactions, due to the low sample consumption, high sensitivity, and label-free nature. Nowadays, native-ESI MS is heavily used in studies of non-covalent interactions and to understand the architecture of biomolecular complexes. However, MALDI-MS is also becoming increasingly useful. It is challenging to detect the intact complex without fragmentation when analyzing non-covalent interactions with MALDI-MS. There are two methodological approaches to do so. In the first approach, different experimental and instrumental parameters are fine-tuned in order to find conditions under which the complex is stable, such as applying non-acidic matrices and collecting first-shot spectra. In the second approach, the interacting species are "artificially" stabilized by chemical crosslinking. Both approaches are capable of studying non-covalently bound biomolecules even in quite challenging systems, such as membrane protein complexes. Herein, we review and compare native-ESI and MALDI MS for the study of non-covalent interactions.

The application of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDIMS) for the analysis of high-mass proteins requires suitable calibration standards at high m/z ratios. Several possible candidates were investigated, and concatenated polyproteins based on recombinantly expressed maltodextrin-binding protein (MBP) are shown here to be well suited for this purpose. Introduction of two specific recognition sites into the primary sequence of the polyprotein allows for the selective cleavage of MBP3 into MBP and MBP2. Moreover, these MBP2 and MBP3 oligomers can be dimerized specifically, such that generation of MPB4 and MBP6 is possible as well. With the set of calibrants presented here, the m/z range of 40-400 kDa is covered. Since all calibrants consist of the same species and differ only in mass, the ionization efficiency is expected to be similar. However, equimolar mixtures of these proteins did not yield equal signal intensities on a detector specifically designed for detecting high-mass molecules. and MBP 6 is possible as well. With the set of calibrants presented here, the m/z range of 40-400 kDa is covered. Since all calibrants consist of the same species and differ only in mass, the ionization efficiency is expected to be similar. However, equimolar mixtures of these proteins did not yield equal signal intensities on a detector specifically designed for detecting high-mass molecules.

In high-mass matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS), the accessible m/z range is limited by the detector used. Therefore, special high-mass detectors based on ion conversion dynodes (ICDs) have been developed. Recently, we have found that mass bias may exist when such ICD detectors are used [Weidmann et al., Anal. Chem. 85(6), 3425-3432 (2013)]. In this contribution, the mass-dependent response of an ICD detector was systematically studied, the response factors for proteins with molecular weights from 35.9 to 129.9 kDa were determined, and the reasons for mass bias were identified. Compared with commonly employed microchannel plate detectors, we found that the mass discrimination is less pronounced, although ions with higher masses are weakly favored when using an ICD detector. The relative response was found to depend on the laser power used for MALDI; low-mass ions are discriminated against with higher laser power. The effect of mutual ion suppression in dependence of the proteins used and their molar ratio is shown. Mixtures consisting of protein oligomers that only differ in mass show less mass discrimination than mixtures consisting of different proteins with similar masses. Furthermore, mass discrimination increases for molar ratios far from 1. Finally, we present clear guidelines that help to choose the experimental parameters such that the response measured matches the actual molar fraction as closely as possible.