BackgroundBoth ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease can cause disturbances in the myocardial blood volume (MBV), myocardial perfusion and the myocardial extracellular volume fraction (ECV). Recent studies suggest that native myocardial T1 mapping can detect changes in MBV during adenosine stress without the use of contrast agents. Furthermore, native T2 mapping could also potentially be used to quantify changes in myocardial perfusion and/or MBV. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the relative contributions of myocardial perfusion, MBV and ECV to native T1 and native T2 at rest and during adenosine stress in normal physiology.MethodsHealthy subjects (n = 41, 26 ± 5 years, 51% females) underwent 1.5 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) scanning. Quantitative myocardial perfusion [ml/min/g] and MBV [%] maps were computed from first pass perfusion imaging at adenosine stress (140 microg/kg/min infusion) and rest following an intravenous contrast bolus (0.05 mmol/kg, gadobutrol). Native T1 and T2 maps were acquired before and during adenosine stress. T1 maps at rest and stress were also acquired following a 0.2 mmol/kg cumulative intravenous contrast dose, rendering rest and stress ECV maps [%]. Myocardial T1, T2, perfusion, MBV and ECV values were measured by delineating a region of interest in the midmural third of the myocardium.ResultsDuring adenosine stress, there was an increase in myocardial native T1, native T2, perfusion, MBV, and ECV (p ≤ 0.001 for all). Myocardial perfusion, MBV and ECV all correlated with both native T1 and native T2, respectively (R2 = 0.35 to 0.61, p < 0.001 for all).Multivariate linear regression revealed that ECV and perfusion together best explained the change in native T2 (ECV beta 0.21, p = 0.02, perfusion beta 0.66, p < 0.001, model R2 = 0.64, p < 0.001), and native T1 (ECV beta 0.50, p < 0.001, perfusion beta 0.43, p < 0.001, model R2 = 0.69, p < 0.001).ConclusionsMyocardial native T1, native T2, perfusion, MBV, and ECV all increase during adenosine stress. Changes in myocardial native T1 and T2 during adenosine stress in normal physiology can largely be explained by the combined changes in myocardial perfusion and ECV.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02723747. Registered March 16, 2016.

No abstract

No abstract

IntroductionExcretion of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) extracellular gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) into pleural and pericardial effusions, sometimes referred to as vicarious excretion, has been described as a rare occurrence using T1-weighted imaging. However, the T1 mapping characteristics as well as presence, magnitude and dynamics of contrast excretion into these effusions is not known.AimsTo investigate and compare the differences in T1 mapping characteristics and extracellular GBCA excretion dynamics in pleural and pericardial effusions.MethodsClinically referred patients with a pericardial and/or pleural effusion underwent CMR T1 mapping at 1.5 T before, and at 3 (early) and at 27 (late) minutes after administration of an extracellular GBCA (0.2 mmol/kg, gadoteric acid). Analyzed effusion characteristics were native T1, ΔR1 early and late after contrast injection, and the effusion-volume-independent early-to-late contrast concentration ratio ΔR1early/ΔR1late, where ΔR1 = 1/T1post-contrast - 1/T1native.ResultsNative T1 was lower in pericardial effusions (n = 69) than in pleural effusions (n = 54) (median [interquartile range], 2912 [2567–3152] vs 3148 [2692–3494] ms, p = 0.005). Pericardial and pleural effusions did not differ with regards to ΔR1early (0.05 [0.03–0.10] vs 0.07 [0.03–0.12] s− 1, p = 0.38). Compared to pleural effusions, pericardial effusions had a higher ΔR1late (0.8 [0.6–1.2] vs 0.4 [0.2–0.6] s− 1, p < 0.001) and ΔR1early/ΔR1late (0.19 [0.08–0.30] vs 0.12 [0.04–0.19], p < 0.001).ConclusionsT1 mapping shows that extracellular GBCA is excreted into pericardial and pleural effusions. Consequently, the previously used term vicarious excretion is misleading. Compared to pleural effusions, pericardial effusions had both a lower native T1, consistent with lesser relative fluid content in relation to other components such as proteins, and more prominent early excretion dynamics, which could be related to inflammation. The clinical diagnostic utility of T1 mapping to determine quantitative contrast dynamics in pericardial and pleural effusions merits further investigation.