The first plastid evolved from an endosymbiotic cyanobacterium in the common ancestor of the Archaeplastida. The transformative steps from cyanobacterium to organelle included the transfer of control over developmental processes, a necessity for the host to orchestrate, for example, the fission of the organelle. The plastids of almost all embryophytes divide independently from nuclear division, leading to cells housing multiple plastids. Hornworts, however, are monoplastidic (or near-monoplastidic), and their photosynthetic organelles are a curious exception among embryophytes for reasons such as the occasional presence of pyrenoids. In this study, we screened genomic and transcriptomic data of eleven hornworts for components of plastid developmental pathways. We found intriguing differences among hornworts and specifically highlight that pathway components involved in regulating plastid development and biogenesis were differentially lost in this group of bryophytes. Our results also confirmed that hornworts underwent significant instances of gene loss, underpinning that the gene content of this group is significantly lower than other bryophytes and tracheophytes. In combination with ancestral state reconstruction, our data suggest that hornworts have reverted back to a monoplastidic phenotype due to the combined loss of two plastid division-associated genes, namely, ARC3 and FtsZ2.

Summary The identification of the asgard archaea has fueled speculations regarding the nature of the archaeal host in eukaryogenesis and its level of complexity prior to endosymbiosis. Here we analyzed the coding capacity of 150 eukaryotes, 1000 bacteria, and 226 archaea, including the only cultured member of the asgard archaea. Clustering methods that consistently recover endosymbiotic contributions to eukaryotic genomes, recover an asgard archaeal-unique contribution of a mere 0.3% to protein families present in the last eukaryotic common ancestor, while simultaneously suggesting that this group’s diversity rivals that of all other archaea combined. The number of homologs shared exclusively between asgard archaea and eukaryotes is only 27 on average. This tiny asgard archaeal-unique contribution to the root of eukaryotic protein families, questions claims that archaea evolved complexity prior to eukaryogenesis. Genomic and cellular complexity remains a eukaryote-specific feature and is best understood as the archaeal host’s solution to housing an endosymbiont.

The first plastid evolved from an endosymbiotic cyanobacterium in the common ancestor of the Archaeplastida. The transformative steps from cyanobacterium to organelle included the transfer of control over developmental processes; a necessity for the host to orchestrate, for example, the fission of the organelle. The plastids of almost all embryophytes divide independent from nuclear division, leading to cells housing multiple plastids. Hornworts, however, are monoplastidic (or near-monoplastidic) and their photosynthetic organelles are a curious exception among embryophytes for reasons such as the occasional presence of pyrenoids. Here we screened genomic and transcriptomic data of eleven hornworts for components of plastid developmental pathways. We find intriguing differences among hornworts and specifically highlight that pathway components involved in regulating plastid development and biogenesis were differentially lost in this group of bryophytes. In combination with ancestral state reconstruction, our data suggest that hornworts have reverted back to a monoplastidic phenotype due to the combined loss of two plastid division-associated genes: ARC3 and FtsZ2.

Biological membranes are a crucial part of cellular life and they provide important insights into fundamental evolutionary questions. Studying membranes and their composition sheds light on the origin of life itself and how it diversified, and touches upon the origin of eukaryotes and their cellular compartments. Here, we discuss the impact of membranes and their associated proteins on evolutionary research and what that might tell us about the emergence of the eukaryotic cell.

The difference between pro- and eukaryotic biology is evident in their genomes, cell biology, and evolution of complex and macroscopic body plans. The lack of intermediates between the two types of cells places the endosymbiotic acquisition of the mitochondrion through an archaeal host at the event horizon of eukaryote origin. The identification of eukaryote specific proteins in a new archaeal phylum, the asgardarchaea, has fueled speculations about their cellular complexity, suggesting they could be eukaryote-like. Here we analyzed the coding capacity of 150 eukaryotes, 1000 bacteria, and 226 archaea, including the only cultured member of the asgardarchaea, Candidatus Prometheoarchaeon syntrophicum MK-D1. Established clustering methods that recover endosymbiotic contributions to eukaryotic genomes, recover an asgardarchaeal-unique contribution of a mere 0.3% to protein families present in the last eukaryotic common ancestor, while simultaneously suggesting that asgardarchaeal diversity rivals that of all other archaea combined. Furthermore, we show that the number of homologs shared exclusively between asgardarchaea and eukaryotes is only 27 on average. Genomic and in particular cellular complexity remains a eukaryote-specific feature and, we conclude, is best understood as the archaeal host's solution to housing an endosymbiont and not as a preparation for obtaining one