The facial nerve is responsible for any facial expression channeling human emotions. Facial paralysis causes asymmetry, lagophthalmus, oral incontinence, and social limitations. Facial dynamics may be re-established with cross-face-nervegrafts (CFNG). Our aim was to reappraise the zygomaticobuccal branch system relevant for facial reanimation surgery with respect to anastomoses and crossings. Dissection was performed on 106 facial halves of 53 fresh frozen cadavers. Study endpoints were quantity and relative thickness of branches, correlation to "Zuker's point", interconnection patterns and crossings. Level I and level II branches were classified as relevant for CFNG. Anastomoses and fusion patterns were assessed in both levels. The zygomatic branch showed 2.98 AE 0.86 (range 2-5) twigs at level II and the buccal branch 3.45 AE 0.96 (range 2-5), respectively. In the zygomatic system a single dominant branch was present in 50%, two co-dominant branches in 9% and three in 1%. In 66% of cases a single dominant buccal twig, two co-dominant in 12.6%, and three in 1% of cases were detected. The most inferior zygomatic branch was the most dominant branch (P = 0.003). Using Zuker's point, a facial nerve branch was found within 5 mm in all facial halves. Fusions were detected in 80% of specimens. Two different types of fusion patterns could be identified. Undercrossing of branches was found in 24% at levels I and II. Our study describes facial nerve branch systems relevant for facial reanimation surgery in a three-dimensional relationship of branches to each other. Clin. Anat. 32:480-488, 2019.

The zygomaticus major (ZM) is important for the human smile. There are conflicting data about whether the zygomatic or buccal branches of the facial nerve are responsible for its motor innervation. The literature provides no precise distinction of the transition zone between these two branch systems. In this study, a definition to distinguish the facial nerve branches at the level of the body of the zygoma is proposed. In the light of this definition, we conducted an anatomical study to determine how the source of innervation of the ZM was distributed. A total of 96 fresh-frozen cadaveric facial halves were dissected under loupe magnification. A hemiparotidectomy was followed by antegrade microsurgical dissection. Any branch topographically lying superficial to the zygoma or touching it was classed as zygomatic, and any neighboring inferior branch was considered buccal. The arborization of the facial nerve was diffuse in all cases. In 64 out of 96 specimens (67%, 95% CI: 56% to 76%), zygomatic branches innervated the ZM. Buccal branches innervated ZM in the other 32 facial halves (33%, 95% CI: 24% to 44%). There were no differences in respect of sex or facial side. All facial halves displayed additional branches, which crossed the muscle on its inner surface without supplying it. In 31 specimens, a nerve branch ran superficial to ZM in its cranial third. According to our classification, the zygomaticus major is innervated by zygomatic branches in 67% of cases and by buccal branches in 33%. Clin. Anat. 31:560-565, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

We developed a time-efficient semi-automated axon quantification method using freeware in human cranial nerve sections stained with paraphenylenediamine (PPD). It was used to analyze a total of 1238 facial and masseteric nerve biopsies. The technique was validated by comparing manual and semiautomated quantification of 129 (10.4%) randomly selected biopsies. The software-based method demonstrated a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 87%. Semi-automatic axon counting was significantly faster (p < 0.001) than manual counting. It took 1 hour and 47 minutes for all 129 biopsies (averaging 50 sec per biopsy, 0.04 seconds per axon). The counting process is automatic and does not need to be supervised. Manual counting took 21 hours and 6 minutes in total (average 9 minutes and 49 seconds per biopsy, 0.52 seconds per axon). Our method showed a linear correlation to the manual counts (R = 0.944 Spearman rho). Attempts have been made by several research groups to automate axonal load quantification. These methods often require specific hard-and software and are therefore only accessible to a few specialized laboratories. Our semi-automated axon quantification is precise, reliable and time-sparing using publicly available software and should be useful for an effective axon quantification in various human peripheral nerves. Microscopic analysis of peripheral nerves is key for many clinical and research based projects. Peripheral nerves have been analyzed through multiple methods, which can generally be categorized into 'manual' , 'automated' and 'semi-automated' methods. Here, the terms for 'manual' and 'fully automated' morphometry will be used as previously described 1-4. 'Semi-automated' will be used synonymously with Urso-Baiardas 'interactive automated' approach; an automated method with the opportunity for manual preparation or alteration 3. In the past, no prime and uniform method could be found, that is simple, cost efficient and time sparing. Therefore, tendentially, small research collectives use manual methods for analysis 1,2,5. Attempts have been made by several research groups throughout medical and scientific research, to automate this process 3,6-8. Unfortunately, it is often found, that these methods are either highly specialized, thus accessible to only few expert laboratories, or, in the case of highly developed software and hardware, very costly 3,9. By example, Marina et al. have coined a method which, similar to this project, focuses on simpler semi-automated anaylsis 10. Other research groups such as Hunter et al. focus on highly specialized methods, which are able to produce a wide range of data and process numerous variables 11. The semi-automated quantification method proposed in this study was developed as part of a greater study on Human facial nerves, for which a time sparing, cost efficient and user-friendly method of axonal quantification was required. Patients with facial palsy, caused by dysfunction of the seventh cranial nerve, suffer emotional distress and are often socially isolated 1...

No donor nerve has been described to match axonal load or fascicle number of the extratemporal facial nerve main trunk. However, the masseteric nerve may be coapted for neurotization of facial muscles with a low complication rate and good clinical outcomes. Nerve transfer is indicated from 6 months after onset of facial paralysis if no recovery of facial nerve function is seen.

Background The marginal mandibular branch (MMB) of the facial nerve provides lower lip symmetry apparent during human smile or crying and is mandatory for vocal phonation. In treating facial palsy patients, so far, little attention is directed at the MMB in facial reanimation surgery. However, isolated paralysis may occur congenital, in Bell's palsy or iatrogenic during surgery, prone to its anatomical course. A variety of therapies address symmetry with either weakening of the functional side or reconstruction of the paralyzed side. To further clarify the histoanatomic basis of facial reanimation procedures using nerve transfers, we conducted a human cadaver study examining macroanatomical and microanatomical features of the MMB including its axonal capacity. Methods Nerve biopsies of the MMB were available from 96 facial halves. Histological processing, digitalization, nerve morphometry investigation, and semiautomated axonal quantification were performed. Statistical analysis was conducted with P < 0.05 as level of significance. Results The main branch of 96 specimens contained an average of 3.72 fascicles 1 to 12, and the axonal capacity was 1603 ± 849 (398–5110, n = 85). Differences were found for sex (P = 0.018), not for facial sides (P = 0.687). Diameters were measured with 1130 ± 327 μm (643–2139, n = 79). A significant difference was noted between sexes (P = 0.029), not for facial sides (P = 0.512.) One millimeter in diameter corresponded to 1480 ± 630 axons (n = 71). A number of 900 axons was correlated with 0.97 mm (specificity, 90%; sensitivity, 72%). Conclusions Our morphometric results for the MMB provide basic information for further investigations, among dealing with functional reconstructive procedures such as nerve transfers, nerve grafting for direct neurotization or babysitter procedures, and neurectomies to provide ideal power and authenticity.